st people" with
"grow the network as large as possible, so we can be robust against
more subtle attackers".
___________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
whos then receiving home-addresses from longtime relay-owners earned
t-shirts?!
Am Dienstag, 17. November 2015 21:00 schrieb nusenu
:
tor weather hasn't been working for me for a long time and AFAIK it
is
not maintained...
_______
tor-r
Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2015 08:57 schrieb Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner
:
Have you restarted
Tor after you made changes?
Yes. After ive done changes i always restart the Server hard. Tor is
Running As Daemon so hours after restart i just do a check at
atlas.torproject.org
Hi!
> Hi All
> Is it possible to schedule the time when bandwith will looks as follow:
>
> 8:00 - 18:00 - Tor relay bandwith 250kb/s
>
> 18:00 - 8:00 - Tor relay bandwith 10 000kb/s
>
>
> How may I schedule this in tor relay ? Is it possible to limit traffic
> on
hi,
wondering what happened to consensus lately? weight-drops, list says
was missing authority signatures
? thanks
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Mozilla <3
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
follwing advice:
For each Tor process set in torrc:
BandwidthRate 1300 bytes
BandwidthBurst 13375000 bytes
So you end up with
Server1: 4x 1300 bytes = 4x13MB/s
Server2: 4x 1300 bytes = 4x13MB/s
(in each direction)
104+104=208 MB/s
You hopefully will end up with ~540TB per month.
(oh
hi,
just wondering whats the matter with these 66+ relays "cloudvps" ...
guess they get vote, should we discard some iprages?
thanks
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
since not declaring $family could cause risk to Tor-Network: action
should take place if relayoperator is not responding&changing config,
right?
Am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2016 20:28 schrieb nusenu
:
just wondering whats the matter with these 66+ relays "cloudvps" ...
and commit 2f8cf524b.
Tim
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B
teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject
On 10.11.2011 11:48, David wrote:
> I just wanted to let everyone know that my two Tor nodes have been
> raided (+all my computer equipment and everything that could store data).
>
> I'm not sure what triggered all this unwanted attention, but I suspect
> that it's th
6 months.
--
Exocet node
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=028d9bcc8204f10d93d8625903a723e50d0b3a89
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
o packet to the dedicated port). The service is running for more than
2 weeks now.
My question is : does obfsproxy advertise like the regular bridge service ?
Best regards.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproj
jvoisin via tor-relays wrote:
> Is this something other operators have seen too or are we alone?
You're not alone, they're desperately trying to advertise themselves
and you shouldn't give them any form of importance by replying to them.
In fact, they will probably discard
We receive this mostly from France and Germany. We figured out that
they downloaded the Tor Browser then looked at the Tor Circuit widget
and just collected the addresses they could see there.
This is the same as when Police, Attention Seekers, Cyber White
Knights, Censors and other scoundrels c
ice.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
lacklist, they maintain a whitelist, that is,
everything is blocked but what's on the list.
The result is that people can't even update software, things start to
break and then they are forced to lift the filtering up a little bit
which sometimes result in making bootstrapping Tor possible.
Vasilis,
It turned out to be a pretty "non-event". The jurisdiction was a relatively
small one on the east coast of the US. The staff of the prosecutor's office
were all very professional and pleasant to work with. Phoul coordinated the
production of a letter from the Tor Pr
t let these new relays turn into
Conrad and Nathaniel 'Cordially' Suchy's DeadGreyPonyIT show again.
No one else cares about you and your confused lackeys attempts to be big-boy
tor relay operators.
If you wish to join the network again, please do it in the style of someone
resp
.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:08 PM, Nathaniel 'Cordially' Suchy
wrote:
> Following up,
>
> I am not longer associated with Greypony IT nor Mr. Rockenhaus. If Mr.
> Rockenhaus decides to discuss his next Tor Exit Hosting Service do know
>
me directly.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Conrad_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
hello, I managed until now the relay tor-turing -
8456DFA94161CDD99E480C2A2992C366C6564410 - ip 62.210.254.132 for four years and
it was in the list of Fallback Directory. However he did not answer for 2
weeks, the support of my hosting provider told me that the motherboard is out
of order
Well, can be hard to say just looking at that number. Linux is not Windows.. it
doesn't have to reboot every time it's patched.
A tor op
Originalmeddelande
På 4 okt. 2019 14:35, Steve Snyder < swsny...@snydernet.net> skrev:
On 10/4/19 7:39 AM, li...@for-privacy
delegated our filtering to third parties and never felt
that we should do so. We get thousands of brute force attacks a day,
SSH, SMTP AUTH, whatever. And so what? It does absolutely nothing.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
ht
Hello
I was thinking of perhaps asking and checking if the list has some comments on
thoughts I have.
I'm attaching a picture, hope that's not a problem, guess it's better than
providing a URL to a file upload place (or maybe that's ok too?).
I've been running a TOR b
Thank you for sharing that.
It's obvious that they are either using third-parties or that they are
afraid of being bullied by the Spamhaus gang.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/ma
an some website or brute
force an SMTP relay.
Then they triggered the filtering in fear of being put in blacklists.
___________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
--
Version: ProtonMail
wnUEARYKAAYFAmFJOgQAIQkQ07hp34FMyg4WIQSgEMifmnN5ohFWvfnTuGnf
gUzKDs8DAP4hSvlEPrlDkIY5vlLULhJHuNVbq/UT3r5mfBg/cg+p0wEAltfV
bPlU/3wfg7j0b31h6R4g+Ik+96fkoq9VTqiydQg=
=6AAW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
publickey - tor@bleedangel.com - 0xA010C89F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
one day previous.FYI all, if you show overloaded, it may not be tor, it may be that distcc compiling you did yesterday!On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 09:39, Silvia/Hiro <h...@torproject.org> wrote: Hello all,One of our goals with our current performance work is to reduce theoverload of relays
looking for!
Thank you
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, September 27th, 2021 at 10:23 AM, Gary C. New via tor-relays
wrote:
> George,
>
> The referenced support article provides recommendations as to what might be
> causing the overloaded state, but it doesn't pro
, September 28th, 2021 at 11:31 AM, Gary C. New via tor-relays
wrote:
> David,
>
> This is exactly the type of information I was hoping for. You should make
> this an article and link it to the overloaded support page.
>
> I guess I assumed that Tor preformed external timeout mon
and report overloaded states, but I only know so much about Tor.Hope this helps.Respectfully,Gary
On Tuesday, September 28, 2021, 10:28:42 AM PDT, Bleedangel Tor Admin wrote:
Agreed . My relay is wellBelow all of the thresholds for “overloaded”, for gods sake 64gb ram and 12 cpus should be adequate for a tor relay? 10gb connection?I’ve asked multiple times for help trying to figure this out and have gotten zero response. It seems to be very difficult to get any help
ny
other color) "recovery" indicator for 72 hours. At least the relay operator
would know that the overloaded state has been repaired.
2) metricsport
- This is such an enigma to someone who is not familiar with prometheus, or
torrc beyond the basics. As a matter of fact, when installing the
Can you link to where I can edit the torproject.org documentation? I cannot find this feature.Thanks Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 06:48, <li...@for-privacy.net> wrote: On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 8:55:01 PM CEST potlatch via tor-relays wrote:> Tor has always
You are running 0.4.5.8, maybe updating to a newer version of tor will help?Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:02, Georg Koppen <g...@torproject.org> wrote: Eddie:> Looking at tor metrics, one of my bridges is showing as off-line:> B080140DC1BAB5B86D1CE5A4CA2E
wholeheartedly believe in more status indicators on the search page:Green - goodRed - offlineYellow - overloaded**Blue - was overloaded within 72 hours ago but currently is not**Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 09:25, Arlen Yaroslav via tor-relays <tor-relays@lists.torproject.
The problem is that it’s *not* currently overloaded, there’s nothing to see. Maybe you can check your syslogs for anything out of the ordinary system-wide? Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:09, Arlen Yaroslav via tor-relays <tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> wrote:
If you upgraded tor as a package on your Linux OS recently, it may have overwritten your torrc with defaults? It’s a long shot!Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 12:52, sysmanager7 via tor-relays <tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> wrote: I was notified by Uptime Robo
Hi all,
I have been operating the relays
- Bazinga B198C0B4B8C551F174FBB841A172616E3DB3124D
- JPsi2 F6EC46933CE8D4FAD5CCDAA8B1C5A377685FC521
for about 10 years.
The hosting provider stops providing their current service and their
successor services are not Tor-friendly anymore.
Hence, these
it recover
if you wait a while?
I think it might have not recognized the address has changed, because it
doesn't recover after a while (I waited around 3~ days)
There are no firewall rules that would intervene with this process, on
the MikroTik side it's just an DST-NAT rule to my to
Greetings fellow relay operators!
I'm currently running a tor relay on a dynamic IP Address connection,
usually my ISP gives me a new address every day or so-
Lately [for the past like week or so- /can't remember when it started
happening/], I have to manually restart it when
favor of a scheme where the process of joining a family is
authenticated.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
signature
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Isaac, <mailto:t...@sechsnulldrei.org> t...@sechsnulldrei.org
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Good morning Dakota,
Thank you for the suggestion. I have added MyFamily records to the torrc file
on each of the three nodes. It likely doesn’t matter on the middle relay, but
it can’t hurt.
Thank you for your email,
Isaac, t...@sechsnulldrei.org
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor
s in their homes to utilize the wastefully
underutilized bandwidth they're paying for.
Make your day great,
Isaac, t...@sechsnulldrei.org
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
Nagaev Boris
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 1
Hi there,
If your exit node has been online for more than two months with little hassle
from the ISP, be sure to update the wiki at
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs with your exit
node's ISP information. And thank you for your contribution to the Tor ne
Hi AJ,
First, thank you for supporting Tor!
Second, you're smart to contact the library, as IT would immediately shut
down the idea as they don't want to receive more abuse emails than they
already do (I know we did when I worked in academia). An additional
resource you may wish to r
Good morning,
Relay operators often receive gratitude on this list for running relays, but
let's not forget the directory operators - those individuals/organizations
who are more central to The Tor Network and run their directory servers at a
higher personal risk level than the relay oper
sed bandwidth for these
> relays. Arm shows between 600 and 1200 concurrent circuits (total
> of inbound, outbound and exit) and average traffic consumption is
> 5-6 TB per month (total both download and upload). I think this can
> be improved, but how?
What does the CPU usage of the t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> root@tor:/ # cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep aes cat: /proc/cpuinfo: No
> such file or directory
According to a stackoverflow page [2], you can look for hints
indicating the existence of AES-NI support in "sysctl hw" and
/var/run/dm
Hi,
I've set up a bridge node in the previous few weeks, but have had to put
a bandwidth limit on, as I only have 10TB of traffic per month before my
ISP will start throttling me to 100k/sec.
I wondered whether it was more helpful to the Tor network as a whole to
have have a very fast
Thanks, that's what I thought, but wasn't sure.
I'll play around for the next few days to see how fast I can get it
without triggering hibernation.
L
On 2014-10-12 02:04, teor wrote:
On 12 Oct 2014, at 09:32 , tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org
wrote:
Date: Sat, 11 Oc
e lately.
On December 1st, the tor process' memory consumption went up and up
until the Linux kernel decided to kill it. Monit has subsequently
restarted it, and it settles at roughly 1.7 GB since then.
The logs of the corresponding days have already been rotated out, so I
cannot post the exact
z67fTwXmg14crSj63xYyZHGUY1h1gGphH/SG7HdSF
+MLwJ+HKc2R9Qj0zVn3yCweybwMTgEh+d4MfkD42+dFvsebG5Kpy/vKse/IC/laM
BpgPcWM3TBYkls4cq+/GzgX/qe9oeNCt8RB7H0Rq3nLdNvS7SBXZWCB+TWsq8XFr
B9brTZWqzfUsqkxJARyDlUmkiygAQUliRq2ZR4I9ayWSaZw1LBKAfvX2XCg1+m9v
uHVr3hEUDx5ocfUJPQ5g
=QB5r
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
____
access the services behind it.
That's the way I look at the issue, in any case.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I have setup a Tor Bridge for everyone and I am unsure how it gets
published so I will post the info here so it can get put into the
consensus. The bridge is 173.246.106.35:443 I hope this bridge will help
more users access the network.
--
yetanothertoru...@riseup.net
Bridges I run
Link requested subdomains to the relay's fingerprint, and require all
change/update requests to be signed by the node's keys, and have some
validation that the node can be found on the network (and is an exit
node). This will ensure only Tor exit nodes can apply, and that nodes
can o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 28.11.2015 17:43, David Schulz wrote:
> can i get problems as an german citizen with an non exit tor relay
> in germany with an italien ip? not realy or? i think of TMG § 8.
As a non-exit relay operator, you are most certainly not go
hmm weight-drops again? i am loosing my whole traffic / consensus
weight... since 7 pm CET.
Random Tor Node Operator
Am 09.12.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
On 9 Dec 2015, at 06:07, tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com
<mailto:tor-server-c
Hi,
you didn't get the V2Dir flag with AccountingMax set on... I had to have
the same experience with that.
Random Tor Node Operator
hi
Am 13.12.2015 um 23:32 schrieb Lucas Werkmeister:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all!
For some reaso
MywZE44bJr+SYfgcUn3SWNFY4VrO9qf2Uoh8VtKbHsGOj+SLdG1nLnQOfELU
eaCkGMX0sBif5lhe/Tr+
=v/3o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 26.02.2016 05:15, torser...@datakanja.de wrote:
> * Next, i noticed a frequent (daily) behavior of the Tor server
> dropping traffic to around zero. Inspecting this, let me to
> understand, my provider was disconnecting me and reassigning a new
> IP on a daily basis
On 26.02.2016 11:54, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>
>> On 26 Feb 2016, at 11:52, Random Tor Node Operator
>> mailto:t...@unterderbruecke.de>> wrote:
>>
>> On 26.02.2016 05:15, torser...@datakanja.de
>> <mailto:torser...@datakanja.de> wrote:
>>
On 26.02.2016 13:50, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:27:07 +0100
> Random Tor Node Operator wrote:
>
>> So in terms of censorship resistance, bridges with occasionally changing
>> IP are better for the Tor network than those with static IP.
>
>
least 1
GB RAM.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 08.03.2016 19:30, Volker Mink wrote:
> You can take it down for some days without losing any flags or consensus
> weight.
> Had it with my exit i have at home.
> I had to reinstall it and i have the same stats as before.
The HSDir flag will be cleared after each restart of th
On 25.04.2016 11:45, Petrusko wrote:
> 4. I'm confused, the "bridge" is acting like a relay ? (like a router on
> a network, 50% upload / 50% download...?). Or like a hidden door to
> contact the Tor network, and the client will only use relays after
> without the br
20:00 UK time.
Please quote support ID 13240401227566764688
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
d.
A Reduced Exit Policy[1] may be what you are looking for.
[1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
On 05/22/2016 03:34 PM, Markus Koch wrote:
> If things go wrong (and with my luck they will) how many and which
> ports do I have to forward to be useful as
tion: OpenPGP digital signature
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
7
> and so on,...
>
> is there a reason, why there is such a high number of relays, which
> fail to specify a family, since this seams rather striking?
>
> aurel
> _______
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.
Wouldn't it be possible to code the Tor clients to not build circuits
using relays in the same /24 or with "similar" names? While that wouldn't
fix ALL possible attack scenarios, that could certainly help, and help
against accidental (or malicious) misconfigured nodes.
On Tu
I just got this sent to me, not sure if it is legit or not. I'm going to
assume the worst for now, thought I'd send it out here for discussion and
as a heads up for anyone who hasn't yet gotten one of these. I'm hesitant
to run anything from someone wanting to do a "stud
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everybody,
since this botnet started flooding Tor, my Tor relay Bazinga
($196832C61F30E9D6D179393C9AED4E47FD29796B) has been experiencing some
issues.
Previously, it was relaying 100 Mbit/s for a few months without problem.
When the botnet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 12:37 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> In my case I use 'monit' to monitor my server and the running
>> services - including tor. Once in a while the automated TCP check
>> on either the OR-Port or the DIR-P
tor my server and the running
> services - including tor. Once in a while the automated TCP check
> on either the OR-Port or the DIR-Port failed which resulted in
> monit stopping and starting tor.
>
> I reconfigured monit not to restart tor until at least three
> consecutive TCP checks fa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 02:18 PM, Stephan wrote:
> On 11.09.2013 13:33, Random Tor Node Operator wrote:
>> Could you post the corresponding line(s) in your monitrc?
>
> Of course. I use the default of "set daemon 120", so tor is
.
I agree with that point, because currently, relay operators have the
incentive to not update to the latest Tor version whenever a new
version is released, in order to keep the consecutive uptime high.
That is probably not in the best interest of Tor.
Maybe Tor Weather could look at the flags
after I shift-m to get to the
> menu and switch around a few times. Has anyone else experienced
> this and how did you solve it? -Jason
> ___________ tor-relays mailing
> list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/m
If I remember correctly, Firefox has a bug where it won't do DNS lookups
over a SOCKS proxy. It will, however do DNS lookups through an HTTP proxy
that supports it, such as Polipo. If you configure Polipo to act as an HTTP
proxy that forwards to the Tor SOCKS proxy, and add Polipo to your Fi
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 01:20:51 -0300, Enrique Fynn
wrote:
> On 10 April 2014 01:01, Tor Relays at brwyatt.net
wrote:
>>
>> If I remember correctly, Firefox has a bug where it won't do DNS
lookups
>> over a SOCKS proxy. It will, however do DNS lookups through an HTTP
proxy
email address as my first contact then my GPG fingerprint as a second
contact but the fingerprint is displayed not the email. Now I have it all on
one line with the email address first.
Which brings me to my main question; when I run systemctl restart tor@default
shouldn’t the new settings in
tell people.
6 ##
7 ## HiddenServicePort x y:z says to redirect requests on port x to the
8 ## address y:z.
9
10 #HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/hidden_service/
11 #HiddenServicePort 80 127.0.0.1:80
12
13 #HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/other_hidden_service/
14 #HiddenServicePort 80 127.0.0.1:8015 #HiddenService
Hello:
I hope you can help me. I'm having trouble keeping my bridge up. Ports are
forwarded. Running latest version of Tor. I had it running for at least roughly
7 to 10 days and then it went down and keeping it up is trouble. I even setup
dynamic dns on my router using no-ip.com to s
I'm not sure I understand. Are you showing me more lines of code to add?
Sent from Proton Mail mobile
Original Message
On Dec 21, 2022, 5:18 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 12/20/22 15:27, Anonforpeace via tor-relays wrote: > Dec 20 08:55:16
> mxh-HP-Compaq-Pro-6
logs you sent. It looks
> like apparmor didn't want obfs4proxy to open some file.
> I'm not sure why obfs4proxy would care about this file, maybe it's
> something the go runtime likes to look at. It does not look fatal
> though.
>
> Logs also says
>
> &
pparmor to flag the file/program as
safe/legit.
On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 18:19 +, Anonforpeace via tor-relays wrote:
> Thank you for this. Is there any way around this? This didn't used to
> be problem.
>
_______
tor-relays m
before I start
working on a relay install only to waste my time.
Thanks for any useful info and while I'm here, sup people?
I'm the new guy._______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I now wonder if I can simply
ignore that and enable IPv6, or if this isn't recommended (and probably
also what I could do in this case).
Thanks a lot.
--
Best,
shruub
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Alright, good to know, thanks for your reply.
--
Best,
shruub
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
s time. We told them we're hosting tor nodes, and that there
is little we can do to prevent morons from abusing the network and using
our relays for bad things™, but the netcraft spam keeps coming, annoying
everyone.
Is this something other operators have seen too or are we alone? If so,
is ther
Cant see it without enabling javascript and I'd rather not
On January 11, 2023 4:50:18 PM UTC, gus wrote:
>Dear relay operators,
>
>Save the date: our next Tor relay operator meetup will happen on January 28 at
>19:00 UTC!
>
>We're drafting the agenda here:
> - pa
Hello:
I have recently built a Tor Bridge (nickname is h4ck3rspace) and when it first
went up, it was up to about two weeks and then it went down. So I brought it up
again and ever since, it routinely goes down every 1 to 3 nights, between 8p
and 10p EST. I've never seen this type of beh
Asked this before, but no one answered, so I'll try adding on this thread.
What are the Tor signing keys? What key is being used here:
https://dist.torproject.org/tor-0.4.7.13.tar.gz.sha256sum.asc
On Mon, January 23, 2023 3:59 pm, Georg Koppen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In case it
I'm running a relay on Debian (flavor) - all software is up-to-date and the tor
version installed is 4.5.16. So I think it's up the Debian admins to update tor
on their repositories (?); that way at least the Debian relays would get a
proper update I assume.
--- Origin
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:41:39AM +, Petrarca via tor-relays wrote:
> I'm running a relay on Debian (flavor) - all software is up-to-date and the
> tor version installed is 4.5.16. So I think it's up the Debian admins to
> update tor on their repositories (?); that way
My CPU architecture is 'armhf' (hardware is Raspberry pi). So the post
referenced below starts with pointing out that this setup is not supported. So
any other way on how to upgrade easily on a new version of Tor ?
--- Original Message ---
trinity pointard schrieb am Di
Hello everyone.
At last Saturday's Tor Relay Operators Meetup, ongoing work on a "relays at
universities" campaign was announced. I am interested in it as I may be able
to help a little, so I'd like to receive any news, but I don't remember any
message about it on tor-re
501 - 600 of 1216 matches
Mail list logo
