Probably because obfs4 is not installed or not running properly.
Check your logs for obfs4 errors, and for Apparmor error messages as well.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 09:07, Ross Camm wrote:
> I have been up and running with my Tor Bridge for a number of months now, yet
> Tor Metrics r
swifi4 in Spain. I don't have the time to maintain or upgrade. I'm willing to keep on paying for the hosting but wonder if someone wishes to take over the account and build a new server and upgrade. PaulSent from my Huawei phone_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-
operate out of Seattle Washington and have good communications with the Tor
office here. I am retired electrical engineer with time to help Tor and
Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Hope you find a good operator for your primo relay. I can be contacted directly
at potla...@proton.me Stay safe always
Good evening,
I'd like to ask: How would one go about encouraging an organization (such as a
college, university or library), that they are affiliated with to some extent,
to operate a Tor Exit Relay? I currently operate a Non-Exit relay at home, but
I would like to also see if me and some
When will the next meetup be? Is it online?
Sent with ProtonMail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Saturday, May 21st, 2022 at 6:29 PM, gus wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The Tor Relay Operator is happening today in ~30 minutes!
>
> Here is our agenda:
>
> * Announ
Been getting these syslog messages occasionally *after* the 0.4.7.7 upgrade on
my bridge:
--
May 26 21:00:58 torbridge Tor[ ]: Unexpected path length 4 for exit circuit 66
5, purpose 5 [3 similar message(s) suppressed in last 5400 seconds]
May 26 16:26:17 torbridge kernel: [ ] TCP: eth0: Driver
umCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum?
> Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I had
> insufficient CPU power to support the desired number of connections...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
> ___________
&
Hello the Tor relay operators. Nice to meet you.
I'm Roel Querimi, I operate 9 exit relays:
0B1120660999AD1022D08664BE1AD08A77F55E50,
05757E11F488C50E3425F5F7E9319411B4270365,
5D2871217ABD67C2569C49919B46F3DFC6281D63,
983548730C7F3F52170BF2195C85D1423C33253B
in nyx
recently, which are not familiar to me.
Under-utilization of my bridge is not a problem to me, but maybe someone can
tell me whether the two are related?
Maybe it's an issue at my end or my hoster or maybe a generic issue of the tor
network currently? Or maybe it's all normal?
Thanks
.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
BLOCK-
pgp3voX5MoX1P.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hello,
I have a bridge [1] that doesn't have any keys in /var/lib/tor/keys! How is
that possible and how do I fix the problem?
potlatch
[1] FB45183DD82D572CA2B2641C1AB0EB0D8CE7B858
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.___
tor
://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/A3C4F0F979CAA22CDBA8F512EE8CBC9E886DDD89.asc
| gpg --dearmor | tee /usr/share/keyrings/tor-archive-keyring.gpg
>/dev/null
I thought that the package deb.torproject.org-keyring should keep the
signing key up-to-date, however the package was installed and is the
new
wrote:
>
> > We have released tor 0.4.7.8 earlier today, a new stable version for
> > the 0.4.7.x series containing an important High severity security
> > fix. The affected tor are only those of the 0.4.7.x series as in from
> > tor-0.4.7.1-alpha to tor-0.4.7.7.
>
> Jun
:56:43 +0300, Raya Sharbain
wrote:
>Hello hello!
>
>So the workshop happened on Saturday at 2000 UTC, the BBB room wasn’t
>live yesterday. Sorry about that! Hopefully there’ll be another one
>soon :-)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Raya
>
>> On 4 Jun 2022, at 22:16, Eldalië vi
It's 2x Xeon
2628v3s with NUMA enabled in the VM (2 sockets, 2 cores per socket).
Enabling NUMA and de-virtualizing the CPU has helped increase my top
bandwidth by around .7 to .9 mbytes/s, but still not great.
Thank you in advance.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
not clear on whether
the bridges are recognized by the tor network in the same manner as Middle
relays and whether the two unit limit applies to the total of devices connected.
Thank you in advance for any guidance and always remember
They are watching
e abnormal and, often couple with other
things, creates these resource pressure on relays that we rarely experience
and so our team needs to investigate a needle in a haystack when it happens.
I cut the BW nearly in halv but tor is still complaining a lot:
"Your computer is too slow to h
Hi there,
I have seen a couple of emails from Tor Project with the signature.asc file
attached. I was wondering how I would go ahead and recreate this for myself.
Any help would be great,
Kind regards,
Leon
The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient
Hey, check your torrc, there is a RelayBandwidthRate setting (to limit
speed) and also an AccountingMax setting to limit max traffic per month.
-- MiranDaniel
"-- Původní zpráva --
Od: sysmanager7 via tor-relays
Datum: 06.05.2022 14:16:35
Předmět: [tor-relays] Relay Throt
.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
)RelayBandwidthBurst
6 MB # But allow bursts up to 6MB/s (48Mbps)
AccountingMax 1TBAccountingStart month 1 12:00
Hopefully this helps
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, May 6th, 2022 at 10:49, sysmanager7 via tor-relays
wrote
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 21:49:13 +, toritdown via tor-relays
wrote:
> I am suddenly finding numerous entries in my /var/log/tor/notices log
> that look like this:
>
> Aug 22 01:21:46.000 [warn] Unable to store router descriptor
> Aug 22 01:21:46.000 [warn] Error writing to
een up four days. As of
this writing just over 2 hours.
Or is this another way to muck up a relay?
Sysmanager
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.
ing a more restricted exit policy.
Any Ideas??
What is the syntax for MaxAdvertisedBandwidth?
Currently is: MaxAdvertisedBandwidth 3Mb
Sysmanager
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-rel
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 13:46:00 +0200
Ole Rydahl via tor-relays wrote:
> Since 2014 I have run a non-exit relay at my premises. However ultimo
> July the system load increased abruptly. Idle-cpu -typically 60-70% -
> dropped to 30%, _and_ with frequent drops to 0!
>
> I reduced th
erprint of Infinity2 is 9F459D4756AA61D7ED05D000EA4C757FA19AC401.
Thank you everyone for taking the time to think about this for a moment and
have a great day to you all!
Best
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
!
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
the protocol. In hindsight, it was >probably
>a mistake to expose the iat option to users and bridge operators.
>
>Cheers,
>Philipp
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2021-February/019370.html
On 8/24/22 09:50, John Csuti via tor-relays wrote:
I can dedicate
I am suddenly finding numerous entries in my /var/log/tor/notices log that look
like this:
Aug 22 01:21:46.000 [warn] Unable to store router descriptor
Aug 22 01:21:46.000 [warn] Error writing to
"/var/lib/tor/cached-descriptors.new": No space left on device
What does this mean? What
Hello:
My Tor Bridge has been down for awhile as I was moving to a new home. I have
been trying to bring it up again and have been receiving the messages you see
below. I have checked the the tor project status and see that there is a Ddos
attack affecting the network. Is that why I am getting
Hello David,
again, thanks for your work on adding more metrics to tor's MetricsPort!
Many relay operators will love this and documentation will be useful [1].
I reported
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/issues/40699
which got closed yesterday, but there was likely a misunderstanding
one for gauges.
thanks for working on this!
best regards,
nat
[1] https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/naming/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
=52636 DPT=50871 WINDOW=1024 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Oct 18 19:06:28 darkhoodie-HP-Compaq-Pro-6300-SFF Tor[73719]: Your server has
not managed to confirm reachability for its ORPort(s) at x.x.x.x:443. Relays do
not publish descriptors until their ORPort and DirPort are reachable. Please
check your
People,
I have a bridge [0] with a bridge distribution mechanism of "non". It's been
that way since May 2022. What gives? Should I remove it from the network as
unless>
potlatch
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email._________
[0]
FB45183DD82D572CA2B2641C1AB0EB0D8CE7B858
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Good day,
Not sure if this would be the proper avenue to pursue this. I operate a couple
of middle relays from my home server. All seemed well until this morning. Three
days ago one was promoted to guard status while the other lags behind. This
morning I check the Tor metrics page
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
+neZb2yQjlAneqTigtbejcXxw4UMUik1OZlfKzNFRqCUxbHo97OhgkhM
BLdpnJwb47rG79uqVuiJ45rl8djPdZ12WUzUZRlAzIHsdIT3nLLftfo/Qt5q1fKo
fZadHq5jSkoOLsJF1Nf9e9qp4ZjG+Y394K5pFGskJhT/IoITwZtfri8=
=x6LK
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
pgp5RT64Rcq4X.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
you sent. It looks
> like apparmor didn't want obfs4proxy to open some file.
> I'm not sure why obfs4proxy would care about this file, maybe it's
> something the go runtime likes to look at. It does not look fatal
> though.
>
> Logs also says
>
> > Dec 20 09:15:27
I'm not sure I understand. Are you showing me more lines of code to add?
Sent from Proton Mail mobile
Original Message
On Dec 21, 2022, 5:18 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 12/20/22 15:27, Anonforpeace via tor-relays wrote: > Dec 20 08:55:16
> mxh-HP-Compaq-Pro-6300-S
working on a relay install only to waste my time.
Thanks for any useful info and while I'm here, sup people?
I'm the new guy.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
as
safe/legit.
On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 18:19 +, Anonforpeace via tor-relays wrote:
> Thank you for this. Is there any way around this? This didn't used to
> be problem.
>
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.
Alright, good to know, thanks for your reply.
--
Best,
shruub
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I now wonder if I can simply
ignore that and enable IPv6, or if this isn't recommended (and probably
also what I could do in this case).
Thanks a lot.
--
Best,
shruub
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
told them we're hosting tor nodes, and that there
is little we can do to prevent morons from abusing the network and using
our relays for bad things™, but the netcraft spam keeps coming, annoying
everyone.
Is this something other operators have seen too or are we alone? If so,
is there anything
jvoisin via tor-relays wrote:
> Is this something other operators have seen too or are we alone?
You're not alone, they're desperately trying to advertise themselves
and you shouldn't give them any form of importance by replying to them.
In fact, they will probably discard your re
Cant see it without enabling javascript and I'd rather not
On January 11, 2023 4:50:18 PM UTC, gus wrote:
>Dear relay operators,
>
>Save the date: our next Tor relay operator meetup will happen on January 28 at
>19:00 UTC!
>
>We're drafting the agenda here:
> - pad: https:/
le.
6 ##
7 ## HiddenServicePort x y:z says to redirect requests on port x to the
8 ## address y:z.
9
10 #HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/hidden_service/
11 #HiddenServicePort 80 127.0.0.1:80
12
13 #HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/other_hidden_service/
14 #HiddenServicePort 80 127.0.0.1:8015 #HiddenServicePort 22 12
email address as my first contact then my GPG fingerprint as a second
contact but the fingerprint is displayed not the email. Now I have it all on
one line with the email address first.
Which brings me to my main question; when I run systemctl restart tor@default
shouldn’t the new settings
Hello:
I hope you can help me. I'm having trouble keeping my bridge up. Ports are
forwarded. Running latest version of Tor. I had it running for at least roughly
7 to 10 days and then it went down and keeping it up is trouble. I even setup
dynamic dns on my router using no-ip.com to see
Asked this before, but no one answered, so I'll try adding on this thread.
What are the Tor signing keys? What key is being used here:
https://dist.torproject.org/tor-0.4.7.13.tar.gz.sha256sum.asc
On Mon, January 23, 2023 3:59 pm, Georg Koppen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In case it af
I'm running a relay on Debian (flavor) - all software is up-to-date and the tor
version installed is 4.5.16. So I think it's up the Debian admins to update tor
on their repositories (?); that way at least the Debian relays would get a
proper update I assume.
--- Original Message
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:41:39AM +, Petrarca via tor-relays wrote:
> I'm running a relay on Debian (flavor) - all software is up-to-date and the
> tor version installed is 4.5.16. So I think it's up the Debian admins to
> update tor on their repositories (?); that way at least t
Hello:
I have recently built a Tor Bridge (nickname is h4ck3rspace) and when it first
went up, it was up to about two weeks and then it went down. So I brought it up
again and ever since, it routinely goes down every 1 to 3 nights, between 8p
and 10p EST. I've never seen this type of behavior
My CPU architecture is 'armhf' (hardware is Raspberry pi). So the post
referenced below starts with pointing out that this setup is not supported. So
any other way on how to upgrade easily on a new version of Tor ?
--- Original Message ---
trinity pointard schrieb am Dienstag, 24
t the moment I have no possibility to update obfs4proxy, unless I
switch to Debian 11. One of my two hosters is only offering Debian 10
"buster", so even this would not help.
I have read the discussion on [3] and would be very happy to see
obfs4proxy for Ubuntu and Fedora (if the folks a
mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
I was wondering if anyone had experience running a Tor relay on Gandi.
According to
[good-bad-isps](https://community.torproject.org/relay/community-resources/good-bad-isps/),
Gandi supports all relays.
However, I contacted support asking them
Hello Ron, thank you for setting up a relay.
What have you tried so far? You followed the instructions at [1]?
How do you know the relay is not functioning? Is there anything in tor logs?
[1] https://community.torproject.org/relay/setup/guard/
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:32:48PM +, Ronvau
Hello:
I have setup a new bridge. Relay Search confirms it is up, however I wanted to
verify with you as well. The nickname is:
h4ck3rspace
Thank you
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays
Hi,
I ran a tor exit on them and it got shut down on the 4th abuse claim, i have no
idea how those 2 exits relays are still going,
I would recommend against them personally, and raised in the spring good-bad
isps needs to be updated alot of ones on their are out of date
Best advice is do your
Hello:
Is this update not available by running apt-get update && apt
Sent from Proton Mail mobile
Original Message
On Nov 3, 2022, 10:34 AM, meskio wrote:
> A reminder: If you operate a obfs4 bridge, please upgrade obfs4proxy to
> 0.0.14 and restart
Hello Tor,
I am looking to set up a relay but have not been successful yet. ALthough I
believe I followed instructions, the relay "Walton" does not appear to be
functioning as I would expect. I was using SNAP as a vehicle to launch the
relay but no luck there as it fai
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/9BA84E8C90083676F86C7427C8D105925F13716C
is from Nos-Oignons, and they have a close partnership with Gandi.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin
Hi,
> No network experience but already running 2 TOR instances: 1 TOR service + 1
> bridge.
Very nice! You're asking some great questions and I'll try to answer as many as
I can :).
> My preferred choice at the moment is [3] where I would like to have 3 relays
> (one of each
I'm running a tor relay on some older hardware that I didn't want to discard
when I could still put it so good use.
Some details of the box are:
-- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8600 @ 2.40GHz
-- RAM: 4GB
-- ARCH: x86_64
-- HDD: 250GB
-- OS: Ubuntu 22.04.1
I originally configured a single
a while.
>
> Best,
> trinity-1686a
>
>
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 at 11:43, shruub via tor-relays
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> so my relay regulary gets overloaded, for what I can only assume is an
>> hardware issue, (which I can't upgrade rn) si
Hello,
thanks for supporting the tor network! If I recall correctly, the lower
the better. E.g. if you start at 32768, which is the recommended port
range due to it not being used else where "officially", until 33018.
However, 6 - 60250 should also work well. You might also want
, I
personally just wouldn't know how to implement it correctly.
Best,
shruub
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hello,
so my relay regulary gets overloaded, for what I can only assume is an
hardware issue, (which I can't upgrade rn) since I already applied the
tor anti ddos scripts. It seems to be able to recover, however with a
lower Consensus Weight. I also (stupidly) tried to have a cron restarting
my
ow long it's been running.
> Thanks for running a relay!
:)
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
We receive this mostly from France and Germany. We figured out that
they downloaded the Tor Browser then looked at the Tor Circuit widget
and just collected the addresses they could see there.
This is the same as when Police, Attention Seekers, Cyber White
Knights, Censors and other scoundrels c
Hi all,
I'm running a Tor middle/guard relay on OpenBSD. I'm wondering if there are any
steps I should take to guard my relay from DoS attacks.
My thanks
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin
Thanks for the reply. What would be a reasonable per-ip rate limit (connections
per second) for a Tor middle relay?
Thanks
On April 16, 2023 7:22:03 p.m. UTC, George wrote:
>On 4/14/23 23:54, null via tor-relays wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm running a Tor middle/guard
Greetings all!
Setting up a new Digital Ocean Tor Relay. DO is giving me 3000 Gig a month. Is
there a tutorial that I can use to calculate the bandwidth? I've searched
around the web and for some reason people seem to dance around the question.
They give examples not relevant to me and zero
ice.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
.
TAW___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hi Tor operators,
Some of us took/will take advantage of the increase in allowed Tor relays per
IPv4 address[1] to reduce costs for running Tor relays. This change will result
in more relays sharing the same source IP address than before, which means
other relays using rate limits
My bridge was showing the same thing. Then I learned that there is a bug in the
relay search page and you should only trust \var\log\syslog
Sent from Proton Mail mobile
Original Message
On Feb 2, 2023, 4:40 PM, theyarewatching--- via tor-relays wrote:
> Good day,
> My
Hello everyone.
At last Saturday's Tor Relay Operators Meetup, ongoing work on a "relays at
universities" campaign was announced. I am interested in it as I may be able
to help a little, so I'd like to receive any news, but I don't remember any
message about it on tor-relays@lists.torp
Okay, you planted some doubt. This is a quote what my peer wrote me about the
issue, I hope it is ok to quote, contains no personal or sensitive info,
emphasis added:
> Comcast/Xfinity! has a bumpy past with tor. They periodically block it, get
> yelled out by their subscribers and the
I have only experienced similar problems while running tor exit node, even with
very restricted exit policy. Allowing exit only to port X, and unable to
initiate connections to port Y (typically Y=HTTPS=443, of course X =/= Y).
Note that those problems are not Comcast's fault, although they do
gards,
nusenu
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hello,
It is a good sign that Comcast cares and wants to defend itself. Another
positive is that you did not try things like "tor is only for
criminals/terrorists".
As to the blog post you mention. (Note that to see the post one may need to
delete the trailing full stop fr
I'd like to raise awareness of the Comcast blocking.
As stated in subject, I believe Comcast blocks all traffic between its
customers and public tor relay nodes. That is, the blocking is not limited to
tor-related traffic, all other services / ports on the tor relay are blocked.
Background: I
via tor-relays
:
> Hello,
>
> It is honestly still puzzling to me considering that the relay wasn’t
> compromised or misconfigured.
>
> If you or anyone wants to check out the reports
> https://www.abuseipdb.com/check/23.132.184.31
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 2
Hello there!
I've been running for over 1.5 year a middle relay on an IP address I also use
to browse, withous issues. However it's now some weeks since many websites that
always refused tor traffic started to also refuse normal traffic from my IP. I
suppose this is related to the relay, because I
blacklist, they maintain a whitelist, that is,
everything is blocked but what's on the list.
The result is that people can't even update software, things start to
break and then they are forced to lift the filtering up a little bit
which sometimes result in making bootstrapping Tor possible.
A
Yes, I agree 100% with Danny's summary here, so I have to concede, I did not
found enough evidence that Comcast blocks connections *to* tor relays. I
apologize. Specifically, I did some tests with ronqtorrelays at risley.net ,
who is a Comcast Business customer, and he had no problem initiating
e doing so, nobody was able to
connect to his lightning node via IPv4 (clearnet, not tor). He claims to have
done this back in July or August. We tested just today, and both sides were
able to successfully initiate TCP connection, no blocking here. Importantly, at
the same time I was not able to conn
As stated in subject, I believe Comcast blocks all traffic between its
> customers and public tor relay nodes. That is, the blocking is not limited to
> tor-related traffic, all other services / ports on the tor relay are blocked.
>
> Background: I am running a lightning node, lightning is a
he could do some tests from inside
Comcast's network. He sounded a bit resigned though, so no guarantees obviously.
And thanks for encouragement, up to now my efforts have fallen mostly to deaf
ears.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torpr
the well known file on my webserver for the last few days. Am I
missing something?
relay fingerprint: CA1D49840F37E0C9D5F1770A5F033D80EB6AF369
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Hi chani,
When I try to access
https://vagabyte.com/.well-known/tor-relay/rsa-fingerprint.txt I get a 404 Not
Found. So my guess is that this is (at least one of the) problem(s). See
https://nusenu.github.io/tor-relay-well-known-uri-spec/#well-knowntor-relayrsa-fingerprinttxt
as well for more
Hey,
the paper is from August 2018 (if I looked at the correct one), not so
recent :)
And e. g. Philipp Winter questions the usefulness of iat_mode:
> substantial performance penalty for a dubious and poorly understood
privacy gain
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2
offline? Thanks.
> --Keifer
>
___________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
/ nodes per ONE IPv4,
> and found only outdated problems unwell built.
>
>
> Please when you have a bash sript / receipe,
> I would welcome that.
>
> Hardening options would be very welcome too.
>
>
> C.
> _______
> tor-rela
On 09/02/2024 00:48, admin--- via tor-relays wrote:
You can have 2 separate relays on the same IPv4 address. Are you running into
issues?
It has been increased to 4 and then to 8 tor instances per IP address:
https://forum.torproject.org/t/tor-relays-8-relays-pers-ip-address-are-allowed
going
to fail entirely, slow down, or something else?Thanks in advance.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
heartbeat messages indicate
the relay is working fine. The IP address is the same every time, and it's not
mine. Anything to worry about? _______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
601 - 700 of 1004 matches
Mail list logo
