On Dienstag, 20. August 2024 12:12:22 CEST Tzanca via tor-relays wrote:
> > I bet the reason that my server periodically goes offline is because it is
> > being blocked and not because it is actually offline!
>
> It can be the metrics server seeing server down but server actuall
On Sonntag, 14. Juli 2024 15:54:45 CEST Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
> On 7/12/24 00:14, boldsuck wrote:
> > The idea is not bad. But can you simply discard every ≤ 50byte packet?
>
> Probably not
>
> > I drop fragments and uncommon TCP MSS values.
> > ip
F to strict
adkim=s; aspf=s;
and DMARC subdomain policy to reject
sp=reject;
Since then, emails about Tor-exits have dropped to 0
;-)
--
╰_╯ Ciao Marco!
Debian GNU/Linux
It's free software and it gives you freedom!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
On Donnerstag, 8. August 2024 22:20:35 CEST eff_03675...@posteo.se wrote:
> Hi Rafo,
>
> My apologies for the late reply in your request for the code on banning
> tor exits into *GUARDS or middle-relays*
Before many people copy this, a note:
A relay with exit flag is MOSTLY used for
q
I've been using it for a few months.
Decentralized, no ID, protected metadata, multiple user profiles, some designs
taken from the Tor protocol. All SimpleX servers optionally accessible via Tor
and you can run your own private SimpleX server.
Jack Dorsey invested a large sum in further
On Montag, 26. August 2024 17:33:22 CEST Marco Predicatori wrote:
> All this is pretty scary. Pretty much any exit node manager can be arrested
> on the very same basis.
No.
A Tor router does not host any data, it is a router like any other ISP or
backbone router.
I am currently updati
ine too. Also be sure to learn
> about 'BandwidthBurst' in case its behavior is surprising to you.
>
If a bridge reaches 20-30 MBytes, that's already a lot. There are only very
few (guard|exit) relays on Tor-Metrics that reach 100 MBytes.
> Should an anti DDoS system be configu
On Mittwoch, 28. August 2024 07:53:21 CEST Alessandro Greco via tor-relays
wrote:
> > Once your bridge has been running stable for a few weeks, an advanced but
> > experimental feature is to hide OrPort.
>
> So is it possible to remove the ports from the torrc file while keepin
Hi Landon,
>but keeping it up to date is not easy.
>Plus, I don't really know how to keep it up to date like that.
You check for a tor update every month or three, download the latest
archive, compile and install that and as soon as you restart tor, it'll
be up to date.
It bein
On Freitag, 30. August 2024 14:35:26 CEST Alessandro Greco via tor-relays
wrote:
> I noticed that you have a lot of Bridges active and in this regard I wanted
I have different subnets on the servers and each bridge has a different IP+IPv6.
Until 3 years ago you could get 1 IP for less tha
On Montag, 2. September 2024 14:54:55 CEST gus wrote:
Hello Alex,
First of all, it's nice that you're on the list.
Maybe you would like to listen in on the meeting on Saturday.
(It's anonymous and without a webcam)
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2024-August/02
.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Montag, 2. September 2024 19:01:16 CEST code9n via tor-relays wrote:
> I know I should have sorted this some weeks ago but can anyone tell me a
> simple method of dealing with the:
As root, one line:
wget -qO-
https://deb.torproject.org/torproje
On Freitag, 6. September 2024 08:47:14 CEST eff_03675...@posteo.se wrote:
OK,
looks like TorProject (Gus) renamed the key and resolved
tor-archive-keyring.gpg vs. deb.torproject.org-keyring.gpg mismatch.
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/web/support/-/issues/368
Then I can update my sources
On Donnerstag, 5. September 2024 19:53:00 CEST gus wrote:
> Just a friendly reminder that we're meeting this Saturday,
> September 7th @ 1900 UTC.
>
> Meeting pad: https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-relayop-sept7th-meetup-keep
> Room link: https://tor.meet.coop/gus-og0-x74-dzn
&g
--
╰_╯ Ciao Marco!
Debian GNU/Linux
It's free software and it gives you freedom!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mai
Am Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:14:56 -0300
schrieb gus :
> > > https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-relayop-sept7th-meetup-keep Room
>
> Gus
Hi Gus
During reading through the pad I think I unfortunately deleted the link
under "4. New Relay Governance docs" when I clicked the link on
.
I am running Tor 4.8.12 installed from the official Tor repositories in Ubuntu
22.04 with OR port 9001. The entire network is an EdgeRouter plugged into WAN
and then a firewall rule letting traffic hit the host for Tor. The relay is
indeed working, but everyday it seems that less and less
On Montag, 16. September 2024 12:31:24 CEST isabela fernandes wrote:
> On September 9, 2024, The Tor Project received a press inquiry from
> Norddeutscher Rundfunk (NDR, part of ARD, a German public broadcaster) with
> The reporter claims to have "evidence that shows that in
On Montag, 16. September 2024 22:03:02 CEST Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
> On 9/16/24 21:13, boldsuck via tor-relays wrote:
> > Some court documents are linked here, in the google sheets:
> > https://safereddit.com/r/TOR/comments/19benkx/operation_liberty_lane_le_ru
>
Greetings Marco,
Something I always found confusing is what the difference is between the
Vanguards Github project, and the version of Vanguards that Tor has
implemented. I thought Vanguards was added into Tor no? Is the Vanguards
project still useful despite this?
I'm not sure if this
Hello.
I am very new tor operator. For now i have only two relays.
And one of them show wrong country in METRICS. I run in Estonia, but it shown
as Germany. The same AS has another two relays, both in Estonia.
IP-lookup shows Estonia.
How change contry in METRICS?
Thank you.
publickey - tor
ok. understand.
but can i change VPS to another and leave me old keys? to change country
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, August 7, 2020 9:38 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> - tor-operator-sahara...@protonmail.com:
>
> > How chan
/rs.html#details/AC5CECEF6AF649F2A7F047D102FE9B461DA9234E
They havnt exit-flag. Why it happen?
publickey - tor-operator-sahara-it@protonmail.com - 0x4B4FD460.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor
yes yes understand. thank you
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, August 10, 2020 2:12 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:55 AM tor-operator-sahara-it
> tor-operator-sahara...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > Hell
i was choose vps for tor node special in small country with small quantity tor
nodes. and METRICS put my node in Germany ))) where are already a lot of relays.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, August 10, 2020 1:56 PM, Sebastian Elisa Pfeifer
yes, you are right. ok. i ignore it .
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 1:57 PM, Ralph Seichter
wrote:
> - tor-operator-sahara...@protonmail.com:
>
> > i was choose vps for tor node special in small countr
(more expensive) plan...
Some time later I did so and reinstalled it with Ubuntu 18.04 and placed
the old keys into the new installation. It seems they are now expected
to be in /var/lib/tor/.tor/keys, as opposed to /var/lib/tor/keys as I
was used to in Ubuntu 16.04.
However, it does not seem to be
changed. It still isn't in the consensus.
If it is caused by something on my side, I'd like to fix it sooner
rather than later.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
he free
software movement for many many years.
My 2 modest guard/mid relays will keep running independent of this
embarrassing issue.
___________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Happens on all internet-facing ssh daemons.
Independently of tor.
On 3/31/21 6:35 PM, Cristiano Kubiaki Gomes wrote:
> Hi there,
> O noticed many ssh requests to my Debian VM running a Relay and I am
> wondering if this is normal or if this is happening only with me.
>
> Anyone el
Exit relays have nothing to do with .onion sites.
By design you cannot block them in your relay.
On 5/27/21 6:43 PM, Tor Operator wrote:
> Hello, exit node operator here. I share the values of the TOR
> foundation, that’s why I’m operating an exit node but I can’t unsee all
> the bad i
know if it matters what pool a bridge is in.
TIA,
--Torix
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email._______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
here.
TIA,
--Torix_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
pt is being run over and over again for 2 weeks instead of just
once. And yes, one of my relays fell over with a kernel limits problem two
nights ago.
--Torix
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, August 30th, 2021 at 7:15 AM, Georg Koppen
wrote:
> torix via tor-relays:
>
> &g
Hi all!
I've been running two tor relays [1] on the same machine for the past three
weeks or so on my home connection (1 gigabit fibre).
When I was looking for appropriate hardware (I needed something fanless) I was
surprised at the almost complete absense of information online about what
rease in advertised
bandwidth starting Thursday seems so strange.
--Torix
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, September 1st, 2021 at 6:06 AM, Georg Koppen
wrote:
> torix via tor-relays:
>
> > Thanks for setting my mind at ease, Geor
.github.io/OrNetStats/endtoend-correlation-groups
)
--Torix
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, September 2nd, 2021 at 7:51 AM, Georg Koppen
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> torix via tor-relays:
>
> > Dear Georg,
> >
> > I don't understand that a ddos attac
In torrc I have the control port commented out. I'm told the control port is
not supposed to
be listed on the relay itself. Below, is now what it says. How do I get rid of
it?
Control Socket: /run/tor/control GroupWritable RelaxDirModeCheck
Thank you for your help :-)
Sent with [Proto
iOS___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Dear All,
I can see in OrNetStats that I have several relays marked as having a
vulnerable Tor version. But when I checked and tried to update them, I was told
that everything was up to date. In 2 cases relays rented at the same time on
the same host have different versions.
AlexHost running
Thanks very much, Nusenu - I was sometimes copying a bad configuration file
from one to another FreeBSD relays; Tor versions are all good now. I won't
worry why one of my relays with the EPEL 8 repo got me 0.4.6.7 while the other
two are at 0.4.5.10 since 5.10 is good enough.
--
support article to find out how you can recover to a "normal" state:
>
> https://support.torproject.org/relay-operators/relay-bridge-overloaded/
>
> Let us known how you find this new feature.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -hiro
>
> [1]
>
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/to
The output format is Prometheus but you don't need a prometheus server to
> > > get
> > >
> > > it.
> > >
> > > Once opened, you can simply fetch it like this:
> > >
> > > wget http://:/metrics -O /tmp/output.txt
> > >
>
Tor has always been very lax at documentation--both creation and updating.
I've never seen a thorough site map or directory published. I think this
discourages folks who would like to start a tor relay.
potlatch
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tu
Has anyone else on this list had issues with compiled versions of
0.4.6.7 in which the --enable-libnss is enabled?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
/) Secure Email.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
configure tor (via the torrc file) to restart
automatically once a month? Thank you.
--Keifer
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 10/16/21 5:56 PM, Bass Down Low via tor-relays wrote:
Hi all,
I am somewhat new to the project and trying to run a couple exits to
help out. I noticed my relay amazinglizard
F80494CE5B2441B67431FFA9CCA571D26BC4F6D8 has bee up for 4 days and not
turned into an exit yet. I noticed the
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
;
Discourse was contacted, and as it looks right now, we are not getting
an onion service.
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/40183#note_2740700
I looked around a little, but I can't find where there is anything on
exactly why it isn't self hosted.
--
HackerNCo
I was notified by Uptime Robot that relay 1 of 3 had been shut down.
Unfortunately I found this out 12 hours after the fact.
guard flag is lost.
journalctl -u tor@default
Nov 01 01:03:18 ubuntu-s-1vcpu-2gb-nyc1-01 Tor[328387]: I learned some more
directory information, but not enough to build
Wondering if my tor.list has a typo since I can't upgrade Tor 0.4.5.9. I get
error:
Err:1 https://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org stretch/main amd64 tor-geoipdb
all 0.4.5.10-1~d9.stretch+1
server certificate verification failed. CAfile:
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt CRLfile: n
Hi everyone,
about two weeks ago, I signed up for a VPS with a cloud provider and set up a
Tor relay. I installed Debian 11 Bullseye, secured it, and then set up Tor
0.4.6.8 and started the relay.
The VPS had the following specs: 1vCore, 2GB RAM, 40TB traffic per month on a
1Gbit/s link. I
help!
Best Regards...
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I just read this research paper, maybe it's worth thinking about some kind of
implementation of this approach some time in the future.
It's an interesting read anyway.
uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/16108/Engler_Steven.pdf
Regards
_____
instructions would be much
appreciated.
Kindly,
Dan
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
crashed all the time, but all that happened was that my 20TB SSD was
maxed out within two hours and I had to reboot to get rid of the old logfiles.
My bad, please don't think I write a debug log, that's completely pointless.
Why would I. I rented a pretty expensive root server becau
Does the provider offer IPv6? If not, then there is no further progress
possible. If they do, this is pretty accurate to get started,
https://www.vultr.com/docs/configuring-ipv6-on-freebsd Jonas --
Original Message --On Wed, November 10, 2021 at 12:40 AM, xplato via
tor-relays
Where is this criteria documented?
It seems the tor project, or its designated volunteers, are increasing
controlling and managing the network. In the Swiss Federation and EU this turns
the tor project into an "online service provider" or "online platform" and
subjects
s
are watching the discussion there. However, as they are the ones who are
most affected by the proposal it's smart to find a better place for
discussing its ideas. Hence this thread on tor-relays@.
---response starts here---
As a bridge operator, I stopped the plan on running relays due to th
which
I'd stay away from, however, seeing the time, effort and care people from
the tor project and people like nusenu seem to invest, I don't think your
statement is appropriate.
Even if there are other attack vectors, it seems to have been shown that
malicious relays are in fact used fo
Hello,
Does the new Tor web configuration have an overall site map or index page? I
can't find the old page with the manual for torrc. I've had trouble finding
other information over the past few weeks as well.
Thanks,
potlatch
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
publickey
etered and it's a guaranteed 1GHz link. I
don't think I will ever be able to relay 125MB/s, but I will try my best. If I
can only reach ~50MB/s before the CPU starts to grumble I will set up a second
Tor process and a second relay.
I tuned my relay a bit today, using some of the ti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi potlatch,
is this what you are looking for?
https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/tree/src/config/torrc.sample.in
https://2019.www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en
Both links can be found at the bottom of this site:
https
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sorry, it was not my intention to interfere.
$man tor I forgot to mention, that works too of course. Or in this case $man
torrc.
I already run a relay myself, after several "failed" attempts on cheap VPS now
on a root server with
Yes, thank you for the Tor docs link. But the question remains; Is there a
site map or index for Tor web pages. I think, in recent months, this would
encompass multiple sites (Torproject, git and more). But I rant
potlatch
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message
Hello All,
My VPS host recently moved one of my Tor exits to cloud ops (I believe AWS).
Since that time the instance will not function as an exit. Torcc and keys are
as before. I was operating on Ubuntu 21.04 but reloaded to 20.04. Still the
same. I messed with the netplan config to no avail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
>Since this is virtualization, make sure that features such as AES
>acceleration are active.
Yes, I have tested that. Is active.
>The number of cores is not really relevant since Tor is not
>multi-threaded. The EPYC 7702 can boos
Hello Everybody,
my relay is now almost two weeks old and has the following flags:
Fast, Guard, Running, Stable, V2Dir, Valid.
I lost the HSDir flag because I had to restart the Tor process, my downtime was
just a few seconds, maybe that's why I kept the Guard flag.
I was expecting a dr
First of all, thank you very much for your response!
> This is normal, HSDir flag is always gone after reboot or restart. Other flags
> remain after reboot or restart.
I know, it wouldn't even bother me if I lost the Guard flag.
The Tor network can decide whatever it want's to
Hello Tor relay operators,
I joined this mail list recently and wanted to take the opportunity to shortly
introduce myself.
My name is Kristian, I am based in Europe, and I operate all nodes behind the
domain lokodlare.com. “Lökodlare” is Swedish for “onion farmers”, which is
pretty much what
My suggestion would be to install Nyx if I am understanding your question.
Sent from ProtonMail for iOS
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 12:47 PM, Natus wrote:
> hi
>
> just setup a tor bridge. how can I validate it is up and running ?
>
> logs look fine:
>
>> [notice] You can
Hello Tor universe,
One of the bridges I recently set up shows the Bridge distribution mechanism as
https:
Question: Is this an issue or does it impact the functionality of the bridge?
Or maybe I made a boo boo during setup. Most of my bridges report Moat as the
mechanism. Just trying to learn
Hi Gary,
thanks for the warm welcome.
I am currently not performing any load-balancing between my different Tor
relays or my physical/virtual servers. Having thought about it a bit, I can
only see this make sense if you intend to offer .onion services. I don't. Maybe
I missed somethin
you in the future.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards in addition to a nice day,
>
>
> Ellie
>
>
>
>
>
> P.S. I hope I am not needlessly spamming the mailing list, I just wanted to
> introduce myself even as a small beginning operator.
>
>___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
iOS___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
My middle relay 605EE4375EE4C38215C8949F5808863749FD4F4A crashed and I had to
set it up from scratch. It's up again for over 14 hours now, and all logs and
other checks I did look fine - the only thing which is strange is on the
Tor-Metrics page showing "Advertised Bandwidth" as
Hello,
in my opinion, I am not sure if this is a good business idea.
If I wanted to support the tor network "as a service", I'd donate to some of
the very large relay operators that accept donations and are non-profits. That
way, probably 80+% of what I donate goes directly i
e who would be
interested to play this game for an extended period of time. Even government
level of funding has to show some kind of effect or the campaign will get shut
down sooner or later.
Dec 27, 2021, 04:42 by d...@thedave.ca:
> On 2021-12-22 23:42, Gary C. New via tor-relays wro
per day now.
Maybe the relays were offline too long for it to work for you? I moved
everything within 48 hours.
Best Regards,
Kristian
Dec 26, 2021, 15:48 by t...@online-hangout.com:
> Yes
>
> On 12/25/2021 10:47 AM, Murad Jabir via tor-relays wrote:
>
>>> Hello I&
Hi Gary,
thanks!
> As an aside... Presently, are you using a single, public address with many
> ports or many, public addresses with a single port for your Tor deployments?
> Have you ever considered putting all those Tor instances behind a single,
> public address:port (fin
.
- I tried again today and everything worked fine. I even downloaded the tor
browser bundle for Windows over one of the servers just to see if it works. It
does and the signature also checks out (verified on a different server outside
Russia)
- running tor nodes at both locations continues to work
> comuter and forget about? Regards Carl
In principle yes, because a tor bridge typically does not use much resources,
but:
1. you'll need to have one or two open network ports which allow anyone from
the internet to connect to your tor bridge.
2. you'll need to keep that system an
.ru/rkn?channel=3
* no chunk, no close, no size. Assume close to signal end
The IP addresses of blocked Tor relays and bridges are not reachable
over Chelyabinsk profitserver as well.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___________
Hi Tor relay community,
I have recently made a new tor relay, and all is going well however I use NYX
to mointor it and over the last day it has been giving the warning message seen
below in the nyx mointor, the relay had been running fine for it's first 4 days
of life but now shows
Grüezi,
I run a large number of bridges, which hopefully only the tor project can see
them and confirm they are mine. I know they are used because I can see the
traffic utilization over time. Hopefully they were helpful, especially to
people in Russia over the past few weeks.
After being
though one user was able to find a
page showing at least the syntax for MetricsPort. I also reached out to
network-rep...@torproject.org and have not received a reply. I found discussion
about the implementation of MetricsPort on the Tor Project github but it would
be nice if the Tor Pro
> Fellow Tor Operators:
>
> After about 9 months of running Tor as a Middle Relay from my home network,
> I'm beginning to experience signs of my public semi-static IPv4 address being
> blacklisted with 403 Forbidden errors from Reuters and Venmo. I've confirmed
> by
Hej,
I just found out about the integrated prometheus exporter in tor - yay,
thanks for that!
I can scrape it with curl:
$ curl http://:9035/metrics
# HELP tor_hs_rdv_num_total Total number of rendezvous circuit created
# TYPE tor_hs_rdv_num_total counter
tor_hs_rdv_num_total{onion=} 4
Hej,
taking another look and comparing it to onion_services exporter there is
a slight difference in the metrics output.
prometheus-onion-service-exporter:
onion_service_up{address="foobar:587",name="mail_v3_587",type="tcp"} 1
vs output from tor:
tor_hs_app_
health metrics for prometheus would be awesome! :)
Best,
fran
[1] https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/issues/40194
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hey juckiuscaesar,
> because one person using Tor was sent to jail recently even though he
did nothing wrong.
From the point of view of law or sharia, all people are guilty. But
there is no law to criminalize those who use Tor. Unless there is
evidence of criminal content in their dev
;
> -A ICMPv6_OUT -p ipv6-icmp -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 134 -j ACCEPT
>
> -A ICMPv6_OUT -p ipv6-icmp -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 135 -j ACCEPT
>
> -A ICMPv6_OUT -p ipv6-icmp -m icmp6 --icmpv6-type 136 -j ACCEPT
>
> -A ICMPv6_OUT -j DROP
Thank you all for any replies!
Have a nice day.
Bye
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
here [1] that IPv6 is on the rise and support for it is growing.
> Are there any recommendations or best-practices how to configure a Tor
> relay with IPv6?
> Alternatively, could anybody who got it set up already, post their
> experiences and maybe even the relevant parts of their torrc?
rally, what's more needed atm: bridge, non-exit, exit or snowflake?
Thanks!
fran
[1]
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/snowflake/-/wikis/home
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject
newbie, so I'll leave the
answer to someone with some expertise :).
Eldalië
[1]
https://support.torproject.org/relay-operators/#what-type-of-relays-are-most-needed
[2]
https://community.torproject.org/relay/relays-requirements/index.html
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 18:14:49 +0100
Fran via tor-rel
Hej Eldalië,
thanks for your answer.
Tor project runs campaigns for running more bridges [1-3] because there
was/is (?) a shortage and/or countries changed their censorship policy
(e. g. Russia). So I'd say the statement in the FAQ is a little bit to
simple. At different times a shorta
ey provide access to the tor network (where is the difference?).
I assume that there is a difference, because if not, why bother with
another approach. So providing these two different access methods would
allow people to connect with any of the two methods. If the IP addresses
would be blocked bot
s a way to discover one
but not the other both of them will be blocked at once. So you are making it
easier for the censor to discover them and block them. That is why we don't want
people to run both in the same IP address.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
701 - 800 of 1216 matches
Mail list logo
