Tor 0.2.3.3-alpha adds a new "stream isolation" feature to improve Tor's
security, and provides client-side support for the microdescriptor
and optimistic data features introduced earlier in the 0.2.3.x
series. It also includes numerous critical bugfixes in the (optional)
bufferevent-based networki
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 02:36:54PM -0400, ler...@gmail.com wrote 2.2K bytes in
43 lines about:
: Is there a solution for this specific case? Someone claiming to be
: Roger Dingledine included a PGP signature block in the msg that
: started this thread. Nobody's responded "Hey! That wasn't me!!"
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 04:51:49PM -0400, ler...@gmail.com wrote 4.3K bytes in
111 lines about:
: My understanding is that the issue is common to all 'secured' web
: sites. HTTP is trivially subverted; HTTPS needs a valid cert or the
: user clicking past a "No, I don't care about my security; go
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 02:27:47PM -0500, joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote 4.2K bytes
in 84 lines about:
: is about as technical as it gets. My 1st impression w/ the process
: (& instructions on Tor page - verifying signatures) is, it will be
: over the avg users' heads, or more trouble / effort than the
On 03/09/11 19:36, Lee wrote:
> Is there a solution for this specific case? Someone claiming to be
> Roger Dingledine included a PGP signature block in the msg that
> started this thread. Nobody's responded "Hey! That wasn't me!!" or
> "That's not my PGP sig!" so it seems safe enough to trust tha
On 9/3/11, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
[.. snip stuff addressed to others ..]
> Lee:
>> These are all rhetorical questions - right?
> No. I understand Tor Project's main concern is Tor / TBB. I fail to
> understand why the issue / problem being discussed is in any way limited
> to Tor or a few software
On 9/3/2011 11:00 AM, Netizio wrote:
I'm just asking here - other than entities (gov'ts?) targeting anonymity
software (for now) what prevents this issue from becoming widespread?
If I download an update from MS - how do I know it's the authentic pkg
from the real MS? There's no authentication (
On 9/3/11, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 9/2/2011 4:46 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:31:53PM -0400, col...@averysmallbird.com wrote
>> 4.5K bytes in 109 lines about:
>> : According to a number of bloggers(1), torproject.org was include among
>> those
>>
>> Here's another
On 03/09/11 15:59, Jim wrote:
> I don't have a solution to this problem but I am raising it in case
> somebody else does. It's great that you not only sign your packages but
> that the page above also lists the fingerprints of the signing keys.
> But in case of a man-in-the-middle attack (or a com
On 9/3/11, Julian Yon wrote:
> On 03/09/11 15:59, Jim wrote:
>> I don't have a solution to this problem but I am raising it in case
>> somebody else does. It's great that you not only sign your packages but
>> that the page above also lists the fingerprints of the signing keys.
>> But in case of
> I'm just asking here - other than entities (gov'ts?) targeting anonymity
> software (for now) what prevents this issue from becoming widespread?
> If I download an update from MS - how do I know it's the authentic pkg
> from the real MS? There's no authentication (or even check sums) for
> d/l
Roger Dingledine wrote:
Perhaps now is a great time for you to learn how to verify the signatures
on Tor packages you download:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/verifying-signatures
I don't have a solution to this problem but I am raising it in case
somebody else does. It's great that you not o
Joe Btfsplk wrote:
I'm just asking here - other than entities (gov'ts?) targeting anonymity
software (for now) what prevents this issue from becoming widespread?
If I download an update from MS - how do I know it's the authentic pkg
from the real MS? There's no authentication (or even check s
On 2011-09-03 15:39 , Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 9/2/2011 4:46 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:31:53PM -0400, col...@averysmallbird.com
>> wrote 4.5K bytes in 109 lines about:
>> : According to a number of bloggers(1), torproject.org was include
>> among those
>>
>> Here
On 9/2/2011 4:46 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:31:53PM -0400, col...@averysmallbird.com wrote 4.5K
bytes in 109 lines about:
: According to a number of bloggers(1), torproject.org was include among those
Here's another blogger for your list,
https://blog.torproject
Martin Fick wrote:
> --- On Wed, 8/31/11, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Martin Fick
> > wrote:
> >
> > > --- On Mon, 8/29/11, Matthew
> > wrote:
> > > > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/08/why-ip-addresses-alone-dont-identify-criminals
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If you run an exit relay, conside
> Over the past few months the number of bridge users has spiked, most
> prominently in Italy, but also plenty in Spain, Brazil, Israel, and
> others.
>
> It seems clear that somebody's unofficial Tor bundle automatically grabs
> some bridges for its users, and that this somebody didn't understand
Hi folks,
Over the past few months the number of bridge users has spiked, most
prominently in Italy, but also plenty in Spain, Brazil, Israel, and
others.
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html#bridge-users
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html?graph=bridge-users&start=2011-06-05&end=2011-
When I start ttdnsd with my Tor client in bridge mode, ttdnsd terminates
within a few minutes. The last output before terminating is:
###
selecting peer
peer selected: -1
connecting to 94.75.228.29 on port 53
watching 2 file descriptors
1 file descriptors became ready
received request of 34 bytes,
19 matches
Mail list logo
