- Original Message -
From: and...@torproject.org
Sent: 11/04/11 08:46 AM
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New Browser Bundle
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 01:30:00AM -0400, zzretro...@email2me.net wrote 4.2K
bytes in 100 lines about: : Any reason for this? Even after I
> i believe there is a real need for secure communications but as a new user
> to tor it seems the common entry points to the network are rife with
> criminal activity.
>
> the torproject website lists users as friends and family, military,
> business owners etc - use cases that make sense to me, b
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 01:30:00AM -0400, zzretro...@email2me.net wrote 4.2K
bytes in 100 lines about:
: Any reason for this? Even after I unchecked "enable globally" I started to
surf
: and then noticed a different icon on the top of the window of Aurora where it
: now shows an icon for 'Tor
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 04:23:48AM -, toru...@tormail.net wrote 0.9K bytes
in 25 lines about:
: the torproject website lists users as friends and family, military,
: business owners etc - use cases that make sense to me, but i've yet to
: find any stories or ancedontal evidence to suggest this
tl;dr Did you by any chance compile tor with bufferevents enabled
(--enable-bufferevents)?
Let's see the path of the sent bytes string:
The heartbeat code (src/or/status.c) receives the bytes sent in
log_heartbeat() using 'uint64_t get_bytes_written(void)' and stores it
into a uint64_t.
Then it
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 03:49:28PM -0400, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> While is definitely a feature that has a cool factor to it and will get
> some attention, I want to make sure we have thought through the
> risks/downsides of utilizing this feature, so that we can communicate
> them in any blogs, we
>> Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 2 days 6:00 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've
>> sent 48.04 GB and received 992.41 MB.
>
> This looks like a mostly-harmless integer overflow bug.
How so? I'd expect much lower values, not higher.
I think it would help to post the bandwidth history:
Tor's uptime is
Orbot 1.0.6 has a new feature that allows someone with a rooted Android
device that offers wifi or USB tethering, to route the traffic of the
tethered device(s) over Tor.
This means 1-5 devices connected over wifi, or just 1 device (a laptop
most likely) over USB.
While is definitely a feature t
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:38 PM, thomas.hluch...@netcologne.de
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for your response. Couriously I find no corefile.
The SEGV in your trace suggests that it died in a way that could have
produced a core, if core dumps were enabled. Is there something in
your chroot configur
Hello,
thanks for your response. Couriously I find no corefile. But I did that nice
command:
root# strace -f -o tor.strace.02 /usr/bin/chroot /chroot/tor /bin/tor
The tracefiles have between 7 an 10 mb, with gzip 500-850k. Are you interested
in having a look at one?
They end up with these lin
yes u r right ..
Java Script an cookies should be disabled
but why there r not in this version this is the question should been
answered
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:30:00 -0400
From: zzretro...@email2me.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-talk] New Browser Bundle
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:37 PM, thomas.hluch...@netcologne.de
wrote:
> Hello tories,
>
> after reading this mail I started to upgrade my two tor nodes which ran
> stable for years. I never have seen my tor process disappearing from the
> process list. Unfortunamtely, after upgrading to 2.2.34 on
On 2011-11-03, Sebastian Lechte wrote:
> My local tor client runs 0.2.3.7-alpha. Just now I stumbled upon this:
>
> Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 2 days 6:00 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've
> sent 48.04 GB and received 992.41 MB.
>
>
> I don't run a bridge and don't run hidden services. Nothing in
Hello tories,
after reading this mail I started to upgrade my two tor nodes which ran stable
for years. I never have seen my tor process disappearing from the process list.
Unfortunamtely, after upgrading to 2.2.34 on both nodes tor is crashing within
a short time.
I started tor in debug mode
My local tor client runs 0.2.3.7-alpha. Just now I stumbled upon this:
Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 2 days 6:00 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've
sent 48.04 GB and received 992.41 MB.
I don't run a bridge and don't run hidden services. Nothing in my usage
makes me expect the large 'sent' value. Is
One moment I get name resolution and I can access a site.
Then I get...
Connect to THE_SITE_NAME:80 failed: SOCKS error
And I can't access it any longer.
WHY ?
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
__
On 03/11/11 04:23, toru...@tormail.net wrote:
> so far it has me wondering if tor is really used for the humanitarian
> purposes the technology has the potential of aiding. i would really
> appreciate hearing real stories and highlights of how has helped in the
> use cases torproject lists.
I'm w
Hi everyone
I want to announce to the list that a new release of tor-ramdisk is out.
Tor-ramdisk is an i686, x86_64 or MIPS uClibc-based micro Linux
distribution whose only purpose is to host a Tor server in an
environment that maximizes security and privacy. Security is enhanced by
hardening the
On 2 November 2011 20:17, Julian Yon wrote:
> On 02/11/11 23:32, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
>> I have no concrete knowledge if it would violate any Mozilla agreements.
>
> As the GPL is one of the license options, there is no way that any
> contract or agreement between Google and Mozilla could possibly b
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 04:23:48AM -, toru...@tormail.net wrote:
> i believe there is a real need for secure communications but as a new user
> to tor it seems the common entry points to the network are rife with
> criminal activity.
>
> the torproject website lists users as friends and family
20 matches
Mail list logo
