Re: [tor-talk] Tor and AES-NI acceleration , and Tor profiling

2011-11-20 Thread Watson Ladd
So why doesn't aes.c use the same thing as is initialized in crypto.c? It would seem that this is always the right thing to do, and that because we don't do it acceleration only works for some uses of AES. The fix seems to be to change aes.c's use of defines to match that in crypto.c. Sincerely,

[tor-talk] torifying TB

2011-11-20 Thread eliaz
Following the instructions in the Configure Thunderbird to work through Tor help file. I've successfully set up tormail in Thunderbird. However, I don't know what the No Proxy for field on the TB Network Disk Space Settings tab is supposed to mean. Whether I leave Localhost, 127.0.0.1 (as

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and AES-NI acceleration , and Tor profiling

2011-11-20 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Nov 20, 2011 8:47 AM, Watson Ladd watsonbl...@gmail.com wrote: So why doesn't aes.c use the same thing as is initialized in crypto.c? Because, according to our benchmarks, on systems *without* aesni or other hardware acceleration, using the AES_* functions is actually faster than the EVP_*

Re: [tor-talk] torifying TB

2011-11-20 Thread Joe Btfsplk
On 11/20/2011 7:21 PM, eliaz wrote: Following the instructions in the Configure Thunderbird to work through Tor help file. I've successfully set up tormail in Thunderbird. However, I don't know what the No Proxy for field on the TB Network Disk Space Settings tab is supposed to mean.