> .If I told you it might give away my location.
> Look up "major internet outage in US" for today.
Right, which is why you tell us to search it and get the
same location info.
> Interesting, fios is a last mile solution from verizon.
Not sure if that was just a 'neato' but, for those not in tha
FiOS in Oregon was fine, but then again Verizon sold it to Frontier.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:51 PM, David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "BlueStar88"
>
> Am Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:53:58 -0500
>> schrieb Larry :
>>
>> Not to mention your google suggestion returned nothing recent.
>>>
>>
>> http://www
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:01:04 +0200
BlueStar88 wrote:
> > Not to mention your google suggestion returned nothing recent.
>
> http://www.bucksright.com/verizon-fios-internet-outage-effects-mid-atlantic-states-7233
Interesting, fios is a last mile solution from verizon. Only seems to
have affected
On 04/10/2012 07:01 PM, BlueStar88 wrote:
> Am Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:53:58 -0500
> schrieb Larry :
>
>
>> Not to mention your google suggestion returned nothing recent.
> http://www.bucksright.com/verizon-fios-internet-outage-effects-mid-atlantic-states-7233
>
Don't see any explination from them yet
Am Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:53:58 -0500
schrieb Larry :
> Not to mention your google suggestion returned nothing recent.
http://www.bucksright.com/verizon-fios-internet-outage-effects-mid-atlantic-states-7233
--
BlueStar88
0x36150C86 (PGP)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Network issues happen so I don't see the point of this thread :)
Not to mention your google suggestion returned nothing recent.
On 04/10/2012 06:39 PM, andr...@fastmail.fm wrote:
> .If I told you it might give away my location.
>
> Look up "major internet outage in US" for today.
>
>
> On Tue,
From: "BlueStar88"
Am Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:53:58 -0500
schrieb Larry :
Not to mention your google suggestion returned nothing recent.
http://www.bucksright.com/verizon-fios-internet-outage-effects-mid-atlantic-states-7233
This NJ FiOS user had no interruption in service.
--
Dave
Multi-
.If I told you it might give away my location.
Look up "major internet outage in US" for today.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012, at 07:30 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:16:56 +0200
> andr...@fastmail.fm wrote:
>
> > Skipping the details such as location, an HUGE ISP in the US had
> > i
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:16:56 +0200
andr...@fastmail.fm wrote:
> Skipping the details such as location, an HUGE ISP in the US had
> internet connection problems today. Many websites couldn't be
> accessed. Sites that were of a political nature couldn't be reached.
> Most search "engines" could be
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:17:39 -0400
Collin Anderson wrote:
> This latest 'Iran is going to disconnect the Internet' paroxysm
> originated from a year-old April Fools joke that was resubmitted to a
> popular social media aggregator last week. The meme exploded across
> Persian-language blogs within
>
>
> > GNU WGET is 100% safe.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Except for DNS requests...
That's why 'torify' / torsocks can be useful, I suppose :) it forces all
traffic through Tor, afaik.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproje
From: "miniBill"
Il 10 aprile 2012 20:44, David H. Lipman ha scritto:
From: "Joe Btfsplk"
On 4/10/2012 9:32 AM, Tor User wrote:
Hi,
I think the most annoying thing using TOR are failed downloads. :-(
You try to download a 5MB file and the download stops various times and
you
have t
Il 10 aprile 2012 20:44, David H. Lipman ha scritto:
> From: "Joe Btfsplk"
>
>> On 4/10/2012 9:32 AM, Tor User wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think the most annoying thing using TOR are failed downloads. :-(
>>>
>>> You try to download a 5MB file and the download stops various times and
>>> you
On Tue, April 10, 2012 6:42 pm, David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Tor User"
>
>> Thanks. And I still need the http proxy. I cant do 127.0.0.1:9050,
>> right?
>>
>
> That's the Tor control port not the Proxy port.
Advise is to install privoxy and edit the config file something like
listen-addr
Skipping the details such as location, an HUGE ISP in the US had
internet connection problems today. Many websites couldn't be accessed.
Sites that were of a political nature couldn't be reached. Most search
"engines" could be accessed.
Imap and POP mail couldn't be retrieved.
The very sites
From: "Joe Btfsplk"
On 4/10/2012 9:32 AM, Tor User wrote:
Hi,
I think the most annoying thing using TOR are failed downloads. :-(
You try to download a 5MB file and the download stops various times and
you
have to start over and over again, crossing all fingers to get the file
download
From: "Tor User"
Thanks. And I still need the http proxy. I cant do 127.0.0.1:9050, right?
That's the Tor control port not the Proxy port.
--
Dave
Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk
http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
__
On 4/10/2012 9:32 AM, Tor User wrote:
Hi,
I think the most annoying thing using TOR are failed downloads. :-(
You try to download a 5MB file and the download stops various times and you
have to start over and over again, crossing all fingers to get the file
downloaded.
As Firefox does not s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Besides, just think of the economic impact this would have. They're
already sacrificing their economy, disconnecting from the net would be
economic suicide. That would completely lock them out from
international trading of pretty much all the basics.
This latest 'Iran is going to disconnect the Internet' paroxysm originated
from a year-old April Fools joke that was resubmitted to a popular social
media aggregator last week. The meme exploded across Persian-language blogs
within the day.
Not only is it not posturing, it is factually incorrect.
Thanks. And I still need the http proxy. I cant do 127.0.0.1:9050, right?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Zebro kojos"
>
>
> If Tor is installed system-wide and the download site actually supports
>> resumes (if it's http, it may not; if it's ftp, it's bound to
From: "Zebro kojos"
If Tor is installed system-wide and the download site actually supports
resumes (if it's http, it may not; if it's ftp, it's bound to work afaik),
you can just do
torify wget -c http://site.com/file.ext
or...
wget --execute=http_proxy=http://127.0.0.1:8118/ http://si
> it would have a very negative impact on the economy
> of the country, isen't it ?
They will not be able to use American services like visa and Mastercard, Oh
wait!!!
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, HardKor wrote:
> If Iran realy do that, it would have a very negative impact on the economy
>
If Tor is installed system-wide and the download site actually supports
resumes (if it's http, it may not; if it's ftp, it's bound to work afaik),
you can just do
torify wget -c http://site.com/file.ext
If it breaks (or you need to stop - ctrl+c), you can resume later on by
executing that same c
Hi,
I think the most annoying thing using TOR are failed downloads. :-(
You try to download a 5MB file and the download stops various times and you
have to start over and over again, crossing all fingers to get the file
downloaded.
As Firefox does not support very good download management, its a
If Iran realy do that, it would have a very negative impact on the economy
of the country, isen't it ?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:40 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:46:00AM +0300, zebro.ko...@gmail.com wrote
> 0.8K bytes in 20 lines about:
> : Perhaps there are more sources with more deta
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:46:00AM +0300, zebro.ko...@gmail.com wrote 0.8K
bytes in 20 lines about:
: Perhaps there are more sources with more detailed/sourced info.
The source story a few places are quoting seems to be
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/325415/20120409/iran-internet-intranet-censor
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/04/iran-plans-to-unplug-the-internet-launch-its-own-clean-alternative.ars
Perhaps there are more sources with more detailed/sourced info.
Thought this was relevant.
I wonder whether they plan / the idea would be to completely detach from
any foreign c
28 matches
Mail list logo
