Hi!
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Naslund, Steve snasl...@medline.com wrote:
Remember, they did not raid the Tor exit node. They raided the home of
the guy running the Tor exit node. Way different.
I can probably explain that. We were running a Tor exit node in
Slovenia (neighboring
Hi!
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Mitar mmi...@gmail.com wrote:
It might be that in this case of a guy from Austria he didn't know
that it raid is for Tor node but he thought that it might be for
something else and just later on discovered that. Or that they simply
didn't listen to or
There is a resource for which I need to be in Aus, so I put Exitnodes {au} in
my torrc using the advanced settings editor (and can't get that line OUT of my
torrc now).
The ONLY exit node Tor could find was BGC. Hitting Use a New Identity kept
giving me only the BGC exit node 202.189.69.158,
OK, I get it. I think my BS detector is set to high today. I am just
really suspicious that this guy that runs an large ISP can't at least
wait until there are charges before all the uproar. I think if the cops
came and seized my home PCs right now I would probably give them the
time to look at
I might be reading this the wrong way but it looked to me like the cops
raided his home and the Tor server is hosted off site with an ISP. That
is what is bugging me so much. The cops raided his house, not the
location of the server. If they had tracked the server by its IP it
would have led to
I would like to find a helping hand in giving me step by step instructions on
how to build a Tor based Simple Machines Forum w/ 3D-Cart and other flattering
domain building software for my vendors product description pages with pictures
if the service provides a picture.
my site specializes in
- Original Message -
From: Barry Shein
Sent: 12/01/12 12:48 AM
To: Joakim Aronius
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please
help if you can.
On November 30, 2012 at 08:18 joa...@aronius.se (Joakim Aronius) wrote: I
am all for being anonymous on
OK, I get it. I think my BS detector is set to high today. I am just
really suspicious that this guy that runs an large ISP can't at least
wait until there are charges before all the uproar. I think if the cops
came and seized my home PCs right now I would probably give them the
time to
I understand that they could look at them for many months. In the
meantime, my life will go on. I don't believe there is a whole lot you
can do about it. If they take too long, I will consider asking a lawyer
to look into getting my stuff back but it would have to be expensive
stuff to make the
If he is claiming that the traffic to the forum came through the Tor
node, that IP would lead them to the hosting company of the Tor node.
Not his residence. If they had an IP that led to his home, that would
have to mean that the traffic did not come from his Tor node at the ISP.
I suppose you
PROCEDURE FOR SEIZURE OF COMPUTERS AND RELATED DEVICES
This search warrant covers and controls the procedure for searching: (1)
electronic or computer devices, related equipment or media which has been
authorized to be seized pursuant to this warrant on the basis that it is
contraband or a
Is it possible to configure the tor-talk mailing list to discard
messages not explicitly addressed to it? Like this nanog discussion.
--
Maxim Kammerer
Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Not only that, but the list of people who proclaimed their innocence only
to be proven guilty is very long. I can't vouch for countries outside of
the USA, but here at least we don't get subpoenas on a whim. They are
usually part of a very long drawn-out investigation, and they usually are
On 11/30/12 5:15 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
Well, in that case I am really worried that the cops might charge
me with a crime. They took my computers and are looking at them. I did
not do anything wrong but just in case they decide to charge me with a
crime, please send me some money.
As
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 02:37:30PM +0200, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
Is it possible to configure the tor-talk mailing list to discard
messages not explicitly addressed to it? Like this nanog discussion.
I was chewed out for losing the threading info when I forwarded,
now Maxim dislikes bounces. You
On 1/12/2012 10:49 AM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
If he is claiming that the traffic to the forum came through the Tor
node, that IP would lead them to the hosting company of the Tor node.
Not his residence. If they had an IP that led to his home, that would
have to mean that the traffic did not
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 04:20:38PM +0200, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
I was chewed out for losing the threading info when I forwarded,
now Maxim dislikes bounces. You just can't make it right for
some people.
Well, to be sure,
As much as I'm not sure I want to add to this, and while I recognize that this
is not the USA, do recall that in my own country of the USA, where the right to
justice is explicit in the constitution, it is routinely ignored by judges who
say that they run courts of law, not of justice. I'll
On 12/1/2012 5:08 AM, electricsinkh...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to find a helping hand in giving me step by step instructions on
how to build a Tor based Simple Machines Forum w/ 3D-Cart and other
flattering domain building software for my vendors product description pages
with
The BBC has an article about a similar issue on a Tor exit node in Austria:
Austrian police raid privacy network over child porn
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20554788
##
Austrian police have seized servers that were part of a global anonymous
browsing system, after images showing child
Hi,
charlie.mail wrote (01 Dec 2012 06:07:49 GMT) :
I have seen tails sync the clock with UTC just after a network
connection and start browser. How does it do so. It is the ntpupdate ?
Please direct questions about Tails to the Tails
communication channels.
Anyhow:
On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:31:15 +0100
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Please direct questions about Tails to the Tails
communication channels.
which are listed at
https://tails.boum.org/support/
___
tor-talk mailing list
On 12/1/12, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Nov 30, 2012, at 20:25 , Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
As for the legal crap, most of what is posted is not on-topic here. There
are laws legal implications which are operational, though. And even
though I am not a lawyer, I need
Example of an actual warrant:
https://www.eff.org/sites/default/files/filenode/inresearchBC/EXHIBIT-A.pdf
Please also keep in mind, if it's relevant, that *no warrant* is required for
data that is stored by a third-party. Data on a server, TOR or otherwise,
would by definition be data
The BBC has an article about a similar issue on a Tor exit node in Austria:
Austrian police raid privacy network over child porn
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20554788
actually it is not a similar case but the case of William W. that
BBC reported. Though with some mistakes: the servers
Sorry people...most cops want to put the right people in jail and are
not trying to violate your rights.
Ha ha ha. You are clueless, or worse.
There are bad eggs but that is why
we have judges. When I hear someone I don't know say they are innocent
and the cops say they are guilty,
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 19:50:50 -0600
John Thompson j...@stolat.os2.dhs.org wrote:
I haven't run TBB on BSD, but FreeBSD (and presumably other
variants) have a very capable linux compatibility mode. Perhaps TBB
runs in this compatibility mode?
That's not actually a reasonable presumption, as
On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 10:12:35 -0600
David Carlson carlson...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
You will certainly catch the attention of law enforcement agencies
world wide with emails like that one.
Maybe he is law enforcement, looking for someone to ensnare.
--
3072D/F3A66B3A Julian Yon (2012 General
On Sat, 01 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0100
Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) li...@infosecurity.ch wrote:
This would probably be something *very valuable* for any Tor Exit Node
maintainer if Tor software would provide such kind of facility to
facilitate:
- understanding of a third party
- drive the
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:42:45 -0600
Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote:
[Load of US-centred rubbish]
Seriously, you need to realise that most of the world is not the
States, and things work differently over here. Some parts of Europe are
safer than others, and some (including UK) are
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, grarpamp wrote:
I don't agree. torsocks is still useful to prevent identity correlation
through circuit sharing. Pushing all traffic through Trans- and DnsPort
is not the answer.
Also, I don't want all of my applications using Tor -- just some of
them. Using Tails or
I wanted this too. According to the documentation (ssh_config) you can
use the ProxyCommand option and nc (netcat) to accomplish this. I
haven't really used it yet though or audited it to make sure it doesn't
leak.
On 12/1/2012 15:14, John Case wrote:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, grarpamp wrote:
I
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 23:14 +, John Case wrote:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, grarpamp wrote:
I don't agree. torsocks is still useful to prevent identity correlation
through circuit sharing. Pushing all traffic through Trans- and DnsPort
is not the answer.
Also, I don't want all of my
On 12/1/2012 10:10 AM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
If Tor servers are just glorified routers then they could be considered
more as transit providers and not responsible for content transiting
through them.
However, if a transit service goes out of its way to hide the identity
of the sender of a
On 12/1/2012 1:28 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
Please also keep in mind, if it's relevant, that *no warrant* is required for
data that is stored by a third-party. Data on a server, TOR or otherwise,
would by definition be data that is stored by a third party. Which means that
if there
On 12/1/2012 4:22 PM, Julian Yon wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:42:45 -0600
Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote:
How much is 10,000 EU anyway - $100 USD?
I knew I shouldn't have written that - too many people don't get satire
/ comedic sarcasm.
___
On 12/01/2012 06:14 PM, John Case wrote:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, grarpamp wrote:
I don't agree. torsocks is still useful to prevent identity correlation
through circuit sharing. Pushing all traffic through Trans- and DnsPort
is not the answer.
Also, I don't want all of my applications using
37 matches
Mail list logo
