Re: [tor-talk] nomnomnom

2012-12-24 Thread b.g. white
It means C is for cookie and that's good enough for me. On Dec 25, 2012 12:16 AM, "Nam Su" wrote: > What does it mean? > > > > 2012. 12. 25. PM 2:11 bobnomnom...@tormail.org 작성: > > > > nomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnom

Re: [tor-talk] nomnomnom

2012-12-24 Thread grapevine1111
Its a new form of encryption of course -Original Message- From: Nam Su Sender: tor-talk-boun...@lists.torproject.org Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:16:37 To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-talk] nomnomnom What does it mean? 2012. 12.

Re: [tor-talk] nomnomnom

2012-12-24 Thread Nam Su
What does it mean? 2012. 12. 25. PM 2:11 bobnomnom...@tormail.org 작성: > nomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomn

Re: [tor-talk] nomnomnom

2012-12-24 Thread Philip Holbrook
bored on Xmas night? Sent from my iPhone 5 On Dec 25, 2012, at 12:11 AM, bobnomnom...@tormail.org wrote: > nomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnom

[tor-talk] nomnomnom

2012-12-24 Thread bobnomnomnom
nomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomnomno

Re: [tor-talk] Gmail and Tor

2012-12-24 Thread grarpamp
> I don't know what the reset process or weeks timeout refers to. If > they abandoned the login process after being asked to provide some > more information then the system assumes the hijack was real and > forces a password change. This sounds like it was what they hit. 'Asked to provide' phone o

Re: [tor-talk] Gmail and Tor

2012-12-24 Thread Softail
Yes, indeed interesting and thanks for taking the time to respond here. On 12/24/2012 06:49, Moritz Bartl wrote: > On 24.12.2012 15:38, Mike Hearn wrote: >> With regards to why we do this, you can review the following >> presentation I gave at the RIPE 64 conference: >> >> https://ripe64.ripe.ne

Re: [tor-talk] Gmail and Tor

2012-12-24 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 22:10:04 + sophia.martin.2...@gmail.com wrote: > Can somebody pleease direct me to where I can opt out of this > constant emails that I am not even involved in. Please help I get > around 4 emails per day. I just removed you manually. Cheers. -- Andrew http://tpo.i

Re: [tor-talk] Gmail and Tor

2012-12-24 Thread Moritz Bartl
On 24.12.2012 15:38, Mike Hearn wrote: > With regards to why we do this, you can review the following > presentation I gave at the RIPE 64 conference: > > https://ripe64.ripe.net/presentations/48-AbuseAtScale.pdf > https://ripe64.ripe.net/archives/video/25/ Thanks for this link. Very interest

Re: [tor-talk] Gmail and Tor

2012-12-24 Thread Mike Hearn
To re-iterate previous threads on this topic, if you have at least one successful login from a Tor exit node or other anonymizing proxy service then the security system won't hassle you when you log in from these networks. That's how you disable it - pass verification from a Tor login. I don't kno