On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:39:01 -0500 (EST)
benjaminlinc...@lavabit.com wrote:
> I noticed Tor Browser does not use the official stable release of tor.
> Does using Tor Browser's firefox with tor 0.2.3.25 hurt anonymity?
Tor 0.2.3.25 is the official stable release of Tor. What version do you
think i
I kind of like how TBB is distributed as a bunch of files in a directory
and it gave me an idea for a very simple way to package this as a deb.
The package would include the latest TBB tarball and a launcher script.
When you run the launcher, it checks to see if ~/.torbrowser/$VERSION
exist. If it
>>> The implementation of proposal 171 and subsequent release of tor
>>> 0.2.3.25
>>> fills my heart with joy. Yet, as far as I can tell, there is one use
>>> case
>>> that is not adequately covered. I would like to open and close Streams
>>> (TransPort's, DNSPort's and SOCKSPort's) at run-time wit
>> The implementation of proposal 171 and subsequent release of tor
>> 0.2.3.25
>> fills my heart with joy. Yet, as far as I can tell, there is one use
>> case
>> that is not adequately covered. I would like to open and close Streams
>> (TransPort's, DNSPort's and SOCKSPort's) at run-time without i
> The implementation of proposal 171 and subsequent release of tor 0.2.3.25
> fills my heart with joy. Yet, as far as I can tell, there is one use case
> that is not adequately covered. I would like to open and close Streams
> (TransPort's, DNSPort's and SOCKSPort's) at run-time without interfering
On 01/18/2013 01:46 PM, Okhin wrote:
> However, given the relatively limited capability of those devices, 4il
> wondering if they can have enough entropy to run Tor safely, and if it won't
> endanger the network.
> So,before going further on the step of propagating those Tor small boxes, I
> nee
adrelanos:
> Jamie Nguyen:
>> Hi, I'm the maintainer for Tor package on Fedora EPEL.
>>
>> I've set-up a (GPG signed) repository for Fedora 17 and 18 with Tor
>> Browser RPM packages. It optionally includes SELinux protection for the
>> Tor Browser. (Tor client/server already has SELinux protection
At 03:32 AM 1/19/2013 -0800, you wrote:
>Hello. When I login no mediafire.com, I cannot see my files. I see next
>progressbar , which never ends :
You probably need to enable javascript for it to work.
>http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/3622/screenshotfak.png
>_
Jamie Nguyen:
> Hi, I'm the maintainer for Tor package on Fedora EPEL.
>
> I've set-up a (GPG signed) repository for Fedora 17 and 18 with Tor
> Browser RPM packages. It optionally includes SELinux protection for the
> Tor Browser. (Tor client/server already has SELinux protection on Fedora.)
>
>
The implementation of proposal 171 and subsequent release of tor 0.2.3.25
fills my heart with joy. Yet, as far as I can tell, there is one use case
that is not adequately covered. I would like to open and close Streams
(TransPort's, DNSPort's and SOCKSPort's) at run-time without interfering
with ot
I noticed Tor Browser does not use the official stable release of tor.
Does using Tor Browser's firefox with tor 0.2.3.25 hurt anonymity?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-t
Hello. When I login no mediafire.com, I cannot see my files. I see next
progressbar , which never ends :
http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/3622/screenshotfak.png
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-b
12 matches
Mail list logo
