Could you direct me please to discussion on Proxy Servers?
I keep getting this message:
The proxy server is refusing connections
Firefox is configured to use a proxy server that is refusing
connections.
Check the proxy settings to make sure that they are correct.
Contact your network
So the PKI method that bitcoin uses is a sha256 encoding + sha1 decoding.
The OR provides a PKI key (sha256) with hidden services, so the solution
may be switches that run openCL or CUDA to authenticate the key to the node
(parallel computing is still the fastest way to compute) . If the node key
Gregory Maxwell:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 8:44 PM, adrelanos adrela...@riseup.net wrote:
I assume you're the Gregory Disney who is also one builder of those
Bitcoin deterministic builds? Since you're involved in Tor as well, I
seems to me you could be a great help by providing some information
Hi,
Tor Browser Bundle should work without any configuration. This error
usually appears when you update from an old bundle by overwriting:
Extract new bundles to a new directory.
Moritz
On 14.04.2013 11:31, t...@jtmail.ownmail.net wrote:
Could you direct me please to discussion on Proxy
Many thanks, Moritz.
You are spot-on.
I deleted all my existing Tor stuff, downloaded a new Bundle and - hey,
presto - Tor Browser is connecting again!
Most grateful.
JT
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013, at 04:38 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
Hi,
Tor Browser Bundle should work without any configuration. This
On 04/13/2013 12:14 PM, grarpamp wrote:
I mean, most overlays out there are NOT for anonymity
Not for strong anonymity at least. Many are closes source windows blobs
and generally weighted towards filesharing and vague vpn privacy claims.
Those are definitely the ones to avoid. If you can't see
On 04/13/2013 10:44 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Hi Gregory!
Gregory Disney:
Let's not dread on things out of our control; IMO we should use these
concerns to develop solutions then turn them into soultions that we can
implement. Obviously we can't develop around assassinations nor state
funded
Since I cannot reply to anonymous remailers, I will simply post my
replies here.
Also note how I am not a coward. My IP address is right there in the
headers.
Unlike you cowards, I really don't care if you block me.
I'm forking your code and making all of you irrelevant anyway.
Leave shit talking to somewhere else not this mailing list, help the
project progress or stop filling peoples emails with your rants.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Alex M (Coyo) c...@darkdna.net wrote:
Since I cannot reply to anonymous remailers, I will simply post my replies
here.
Also
Hey Alex,
You are correct, your IP is in the header and you got all kinds of open
ports on your VM. If you mattered at all, you would have been owned by
now. Learn how to use iptables, it will do you some good.
I really tried to ignore you but you managed to get my attention :/
--SiNA
Alex M
SiNA Rabbani s...@redteam.io wrote:
If you mattered at all, you would have been owned by now
Snaaap.
You may fork our code, but you'll never fork our ~freedom!~
or my cuddliness,
Griffin Boyce
--
Please note that I do not have PGP access at this time.
OTR: sa...@jabber.ccc.de /
On various mailing lists, I've noticed that people tag subjects with
[drama] if the post is likely to lead to heated debate. The idea is that
people can ignore the thread, or filter [drama]-laden posts out of their
inbox entirely.
While it might not be necessary for tor-talk, it's a pretty
G
riffin... its comments like that which make me wish we had a like button on
e-mail.
Well said!
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Griffin Boyce griffinbo...@gmail.comwrote:
SiNA Rabbani s...@redteam.io wrote:
If you mattered at all, you would have been owned by now
Snaaap.
You
Andrew F andrewfriedman...@gmail.com wrote:
Griffin... its comments like that which make me wish we had a like button
on
e-mail.
Well said!
Thanks! I like to start weird and then just keep going.
~Griffin
___
tor-talk mailing list
14 matches
Mail list logo
