Mike Perry:
> Cross-posting to tor-relays to give everyone the heads up - I just added
> 33033 to the ReducedExitPolicy page for Skype:
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
>
> Non-relay related discussion should remove tor-relays from the Cc.
>
Very thanks.
As
Hello.
I have a simple enough question that I hope someone can help me with.
In Mac there is a setting called 'stealth mode.'
As I understand this setting, a request to a port or ping or somesuch,
will get no response from the computer at all. No indication that there is
anything there at all - l
> In Mac there is a setting called 'stealth mode.'
> As I understand this setting, a request to a port or ping or somesuch,
> will get no response from the computer at all. No indication that there is
> anything there at all - like a computer.
> Whomever or whatever made the request will not know.
On Thu, 30 May 2013, Achter Lieber wrote:
> Is stealth mode a setting that will hinder or enhance the use of the Tor
> Bundle?
The "stealth" mode menu is weak on information but it appears that it
simply drops packets instead of rejecting them properly. When that
happens to you or a service you
Hi all,
just setup my tor node and got the following log entries after a few minutes:
May 30 22:37:26 home Tor[3107]: Your DNS provider gave an answer for
"skwpnmuq.com", which is not supposed to exist. Apparently they are hijacking
DNS failures. Trying to correct for this. We've noticed 1 possi
- Original Message -
> Is that important for Strongbox? I don't think Strongbox's threat model
> needs the document upload server to *be* anonymous.
I can see why it would be important for preventing end to end correlation.
Given the recent example of the massive grab of phone dat
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:42:48PM +0200, Robin Kipp wrote:
> We use OpenDNS on our network, and I know they provide an info page if
> someone attempts
> to browse to a non-existant address. This isn't a big issue normally, but I
> can see how
> it's a problem with Tor. Thus, I'd like to use a
On 5/30/2013 6:07 PM, Sean Alexandre wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:42:48PM +0200, Robin Kipp wrote:
We use OpenDNS on our network, and I know they provide an info page if someone
attempts
to browse to a non-existant address. This isn't a big issue normally, but I can
see how
it's a problem
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 07:15:36PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 5/30/2013 6:07 PM, Sean Alexandre wrote:
> >On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:42:48PM +0200, Robin Kipp wrote:
> >>We use OpenDNS on our network, and I know they provide an info page if
> >>someone attempts
> >>to browse to a non-existant
On 5/30/2013 8:11 PM, Sean Alexandre wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 07:15:36PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Google? Oh, my.
Not ideal, I agree. What would you use, if your ISP's resolvers weren't an
option? Also,
let's say you don't want to run your own DNS resolver. (Running your own
resolver
10 matches
Mail list logo