> I think you sent this to the wrong address..
The goldbug site mentions its use with Tor. And the thread
OP here made a request for people to 'please test over Tor'.
While this subthread diverged from that, it's still pertinent
in context.
Both EFF and CCC press have and are receiving inquiries,
> I would be pretty surprised if the EFF were behind the press release
> you mention. EFF press releases are always written in very good
> English, and that press release is not; nor is the website. It seems
> very unlikely to me that the EFF would let a project like this go live
> without making
I think you sent this to the wrong address..
> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 15:31:16 -0400
> From: grarp...@gmail.com
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] GoldBug.sf.net: Encrypted Messenger
>
> > I would be pretty surprised if the EFF were behind the press release
> > you ment
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 03:06:22PM +0300, Lag Inimaineb wrote:
> If so, what I meant was that since the TOR protocol is encapsulated within
> TLS, as is HTTPS traffic, then the differentiation will have to occur after
> the TLS handshake, which (assuming Iran/China/etc do not have a forged
> certif
Thanks for the feedback!
Regarding sslh - if I understand correctly, this can be used to
differentiate packets based on the actual payload that was received? If so,
what I meant was that since the TOR protocol is encapsulated within TLS, as
is HTTPS traffic, then the differentiation will have to o
Hi,
(Moving the discussion to tor-talk@, as this is not directly related to
the code of Tor software or infrastructure.)
Lag Inimaineb:
> […] why not setup bridges in places where other *legitimate* SSL
> connections are also made? What I mean is, maybe we should try and get
> big sites that cann
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 6:32 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Thomas Asta
> wrote:
>> Messenger with Multi-Encryptio:
>>
>> http://goldbug.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> please test over Tor and is there a way to create a Tor integrated chat
>> server for it?
>>
>> Anyone wanting
