On 19.08.2013 05:31, ITechGeek wrote:
PGP mails, and I'm thinking about enforcing TLS.
If you enforce TLS, you won't be able to send/receive email for many
domains.
Yes.
I want to have a script that scans all incoming mail for the used cipher
and in the case of a weak, non-PFS cipher, or no
On 19.08.2013 09:58, Peter Tonoli wrote:
To what point will this be? I'd say the majority of SMTP w/ TLS servers
are using self-signed certificates. It's arguable whether TLS with a
self signed certificate is any better than just plaintext.
I don't see any point in arguing about that: It is,
Il 8/19/13 10:49 AM, Moritz Bartl ha scritto:
On 19.08.2013 09:58, Peter Tonoli wrote:
To what point will this be? I'd say the majority of SMTP w/ TLS servers
are using self-signed certificates. It's arguable whether TLS with a
self signed certificate is any better than just plaintext.
I
I'd say the majority of SMTP w/ TLS servers are
using self-signed certificates.
Which you can then can pin-on-first-sight, just like SSH, and verify
as desired, which is better than automatically trusting any CA.
Mo's stance may not be all that interoperable at first, but
it's interesting
Often sites I try to access w/ TBB time out almost instantly, where in
Fx (23) same page, at same time - loads OK.
The pages aren't Tor aphobics - as they will sometimes load in TBB.
Part could be THE IP address being used in TBB, to access a page, at
specific time. Some IPs could be on a /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Original Message
Subject: [guardian-dev] Orbot v12.0.3 is out
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:18:12 -0400
From: Nathan of Guardian nat...@guardianproject.info
To: Guardian Dev guardian-...@lists.mayfirst.org,
mirimir:
On 08/18/2013 09:05 PM, mick wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:32:13 -0700 Gordon Morehouse
gor...@morehouse.me allegedly wrote:
Your best bet if you *need* an American IP is to use a VPN.
I'm sorry Gordon but I think this needs to be said. On a list
devoted to tor, recommending a
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 04:45:19 +1000
shm...@riseup.net shm...@riseup.net allegedly wrote:
mirimir:
Well, one can use a VPN service through Tor. It's doable in Whonix
or with ra's gateway, and maybe in Tails (with persistent storage).
But I believe that reduces the anonymity that Tor can
Hallo Tor-Devs,
considering that D-Wave now claims to have a programmable quantum
computer, wouldn't it be nice for Tor to use post-quantum cyrptography?
http://www.dwavesys.com/en/dw_homepage.html
A full suite of software tools is included in the D-Wave TwoTM system,
ranging from all the
On 08/19/2013 06:45 PM, shm...@riseup.net wrote:
mirimir:
On 08/18/2013 09:05 PM, mick wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:32:13 -0700 Gordon Morehouse
gor...@morehouse.me allegedly wrote:
Your best bet if you *need* an American IP is to use a VPN.
I'm sorry Gordon but I think this needs
Same thing happened with Tor 0.2.4.16-rc , no errors in the log at all
this time, same solution.
I wasn't running alphas before 0.2.4.15-rc, just the previous stable.
- Original message -
From: Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor
11 matches
Mail list logo
