On 08/26/2013 11:08 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:58:22PM -0500, Missouri Anglers wrote:
I downloaded and installed PirateBrowser which is a Firefox
browser configured to use vidalia/tor.
Not quite -- it is a bundle that includes a variety of software
including
Hi folks,
Check out
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html
(for posterity, the longer-term link will be
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html?graph=direct-usersstart=2013-05-29end=2013-08-27country=allevents=off#direct-users
)
The number of Tor clients running appears to have doubled
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 03:08:44 -0400
Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
Anybody know details? It's easy to speculate (Pirate Browser publicity
gone overboard? People finally reading about the NSA thing? Botnet?),
but some good solid facts would sure be useful.
Hello,
Just in these recent
It just means people need less bandwidth but Tor has more to give. It means
for example more people can use VOIP and Video Chat over Tor as less people
are using Tor and there are more exit relays :-)
On Aug 20, 2013 12:22 PM, Jon torance...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering with the increase of
Basically it is a complicated way to configure Tor to be a point of entry
for a VPN Server. Why not just configure PPTPD then connect to it via Tor?
On Aug 23, 2013 9:35 AM, Sebastian G. lt;bastik.torgt;
bastik@googlemail.com wrote:
23.08.2013 03:22, Andrew Lewman:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013
It goes through a guard, middle, and exit node which does not anything
about each other than the next and last hop. It is by far more secure. Its
probably secure enough for anything. Even illegal speech. It should keep
you safe.
On Aug 27, 2013 2:46 AM, mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote:
On
I would recommend patching Debian maybe include AppArmor/SELinux/one other
tool can't remember the name but starts with a Ba...
On Aug 26, 2013 12:54 PM, kendrick eastes keas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
I've managed to lay my hands
If I'm not mistaken you need to edit all Tor node torrecs and have the
servers Hash's in the lists.
On Aug 26, 2013 1:14 PM, Nathan Freitas nat...@freitas.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2013 03:37 PM, lee colleton wrote:
If I run multiple relays,
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:30:02 +0600
Roman Mamedov r...@romanrm.net allegedly wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 03:08:44 -0400
Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
Anybody know details? It's easy to speculate (Pirate Browser
publicity gone overboard? People finally reading about the NSA
thing?
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:39:58 +
mirimir miri...@riseup.net allegedly wrote:
On 08/27/2013 07:08 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
Check out
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html
(for posterity, the longer-term link will be
On 08/27/2013 11:43 AM, Nathan Suchy wrote:
It goes through a guard, middle, and exit node which does not anything
about each other than the next and last hop. It is by far more secure. Its
probably secure enough for anything. Even illegal speech. It should keep
you safe.
Is that a joke?
Quoth Nathan Suchy theusernameiwantista...@gmail.com, on 2013-08-27 08:07:28
-0400:
I would recommend patching Debian maybe include AppArmor/SELinux/one other
tool can't remember the name but starts with a Ba...
You might mean Bastille.
--- Drake Wilson
--
tor-talk mailing list -
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27.08.2013 17:13, lee colleton wrote:
http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=Tor%2C%20TOR%20browser%2C%20piratebrowser%2C%20date=today%203-mcmpt=q
That link seems partially broken. Google is not showing me it in
On 27.08.2013 17:13, lee colleton wrote:
http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=Tor%2C%20TOR%20browser%2C%20piratebrowser%2C%20date=today%203-mcmpt=q
That link seems partially broken. Google is not showing me it in
English even though the browser preferences are for English. Is that
not
There has not been a sustained increase in search traffic for the Pirate
Browser on Google. Tor and Tor browser haven't shown a spike in search,
either. Could it be from users in Syria? Also note that the Google Play
Store has been unblocked in Iran, allowing distribution of Orbot/Orweb in
that
To answer my own question, Syria had a spike from 1000 to 4000 but that's a
tiny fraction of the recent increase. Iran doubled from 4000 to 8000 which
is also only a part of the increase. Is there a page listing each graph by
country or overlapping them all?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jon
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
Check out
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html
The number of Tor clients running appears to have doubled since August 19:
And it's not just a fluke in the metrics data -- it appears that
there really are twice as many
On 08/27/2013 10:13 AM, lee colleton wrote:
Also note that the Google Play
Store has been unblocked in Iran, allowing distribution of Orbot/Orweb in
that country to phones with the Play Store app installed (partial
bootstrapping problem).
We also pushed out Orbot v12 to Google Play in the
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:24:18AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
Check out
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html
The number of Tor clients running appears to have doubled since August 19:
And it's not just a fluke in the
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Moritz Bartl mor...@torservers.net wrote:
On 26.08.2013 14:16, Lars Noodén wrote:
This etag trick seems to work ok even against TBB:
http://lucb1e.com/rp/cookielesscookies/
Are you sure? It is by design that you can track TBB users within
one session. Did
PirateBay is pushing the Pirate browser on their website.
People are not searching for it. They are discovering it while downloading
torrents.
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:13:02 -0700
lee colleton l...@colleton.net wrote:
There has not been a sustained increase in search traffic for the Pirate
Anybody know details? It's easy to speculate (Pirate Browser publicity
gone overboard? People finally reading about the NSA thing? Botnet?),
but some good solid facts would sure be useful.
Too big a double in under a week for me to believe it's natural growth
based on news or some promo
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Missouri Anglers
missouri.angl...@gmail.com wrote:
PirateBay is pushing the Pirate browser on their website.
People are not searching for it. They are discovering it while downloading
torrents.
Oh, seems there's a bolded link on the bottom of piratebay.sx ...
adrelanos:
Jerzy Łogiewa:
Hello!
It looks that The Pirate Bay will enter secure browser market,
http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-releases-pirate-browser-to-thwart-censorship-130810/
http://piratebrowser.com/
I do not understand why they do the same as TBB. Anyone know?
With the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/26/2013 07:29 AM, Nathan Suchy wrote:
First off Edward Snowden did not need anonymity. He went public on
this.
Is it known if he chose to go public, or if it was a condition of the
leak being published by the Guardian?
- --
The Doctor
On 27 Aug 2013, at 18:44, The Doctor dr...@virtadpt.net wrote:
Signed PGP part
On 08/26/2013 07:29 AM, Nathan Suchy wrote:
First off Edward Snowden did not need anonymity. He went public on
this.
Is it known if he chose to go public, or if it was a condition of the
leak being published
I think the more Tor Usage the better as it protects Tor and gives more
people a reason to run nodes...
On Aug 27, 2013 8:18 AM, mick m...@rlogin.net wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:39:58 +
mirimir miri...@riseup.net allegedly wrote:
On 08/27/2013 07:08 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On 13-08-27 02:06 PM, Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb wrote:
On 27 Aug 2013, at 18:44, The Doctor dr...@virtadpt.net wrote:
Signed PGP part
On 08/26/2013 07:29 AM, Nathan Suchy wrote:
First off Edward Snowden did not need anonymity. He went public on
this.
Is it known if he chose to go public,
Andrew Lewman:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:13:10 +
adrelanos adrela...@riseup.net wrote:
It would be more effective if The Tor Project contacted sourceforge
and complained.
For the record, we have at least twice. We've now engaged lawyers.
Yes. I also attempted to contact them at least
On 08/27/2013 08:00 PM, Nathan Suchy wrote:
I think the more Tor Usage the better as it protects Tor and gives more
people a reason to run nodes...
That's true.
But this is putting people, possibly many people, at risk. They think
that they're browsing via Tor, but they're really not, except
On 08/27/2013 04:26 PM, grarpamp wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Missouri Anglers
missouri.angl...@gmail.com wrote:
PirateBay is pushing the Pirate browser on their website.
People are not searching for it. They are discovering it while downloading
torrents.
Oh, seems there's a
On 08/27/2013 10:40 PM, mirimir wrote:
On 08/27/2013 04:26 PM, grarpamp wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Missouri Anglers
missouri.angl...@gmail.com wrote:
PirateBay is pushing the Pirate browser on their website.
People are not searching for it. They are discovering it while
There're few problems with ISP when running non-exit relay. Users in
moderately censored areas can act as non-exit relay without causing problem
to the circuit. So why doesn't Tor default to non-exit relay? Users with
problems(e.g crappy hardware, ISP fireware) can manually change it to
client
On 08/27/2013 07:29 PM, Percy Alpha wrote:
There're few problems with ISP when running non-exit relay. Users in
moderately censored areas can act as non-exit relay without causing problem
to the circuit. So why doesn't Tor default to non-exit relay? Users with
problems(e.g crappy hardware,
The Pirate Browser does not use Tor. Anyone who did any reading would
realize this. I feel that the more usage of Tor the better. The Pirate
Browser needs to have some warning on extraction...
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:53 PM, mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote:
On 08/27/2013 10:40 PM, mirimir
Even if you used traffic correlation you could not prove that it was their
traffic...
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Griffin Boyce griffinbo...@gmail.comwrote:
On 08/27/2013 04:02 PM, Nathan Suchy wrote:
Not a joke. I thought we were talking about TBB. Tor secures all traffic
you send
Yes. Edward Snowden did a good job and probably had smart tactics for
securing his Internet traffic before meeting with them. It being a
condition may have been the case but even then he is already public so what
we need to focus on is that. If he really needed security he should of used
TorMail
On 08/27/2013 08:37 PM, Nathan Suchy wrote:
Even if you used traffic correlation you could not prove that it was their
traffic...
Unfortunately, that's not *really* true. Assuming that there's one
tiny data point tying you to a given VPN, it would be hard to prove that
you were the one
On 08/28/2013 12:35 AM, Nathan Suchy wrote:
The Pirate Browser does not use Tor. Anyone who did any reading would
realize this. I feel that the more usage of Tor the better. The Pirate
Browser needs to have some warning on extraction...
It doesn't use Tor at all? For anything?
Their FAQ now
I've started the Pirate Browser and it does start Tor through Vidalia. The
browser component doesn't make an effort to anonymize the user, as I
understand it.
On Aug 27, 2013 6:56 PM, mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote:
On 08/28/2013 12:35 AM, Nathan Suchy wrote:
The Pirate Browser does not use
again id say check my laptop any files?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Griffin Boyce griffinbo...@gmail.comwrote:
On 08/27/2013 08:37 PM, Nathan Suchy wrote:
Even if you used traffic correlation you could not prove that it was
their
traffic...
Unfortunately, that's not *really*
Theoretically, the directory
authority could serve up a set of a thousand random nodes, and then the
client software could select a random set to use initially.
This will make blocking tor nearly impossible and eliminate the need for
Bridge node since authority will have a hard time keeping
This is the response I'm trying to address.
Requiring every Tor user...
Enforcing the relay will indeed cause trouble but default it will have much
less negative effect much almost all benefit.
However, many Tor users cannot be good relays — for example, some Tor
clients operate from behind
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:29:48 -0700
Percy Alpha percyal...@gmail.com wrote:
There're few problems with ISP when running non-exit relay. Users in
moderately censored areas can act as non-exit relay without causing problem
to the circuit. So why doesn't Tor default to non-exit relay? Users with
44 matches
Mail list logo
