On 11/23/2013 3:04 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 11/23/2013 2:16 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 07:42:23AM +0200, Sherief Alaa wrote:
I just see the options StrictExitNodes and StrictEntryNodes is deprecated?
The correct syntax is:
EntryNodes {node, node, ...}
StrictNodes 0
Hey
On 2013-11-23 22:04, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
What about when using TBB is desired, but sites (say web mail)
won't accept addresses from countries other than used to sign up?
the solution is simple. DONT USE THOSE FUCKED UP SERVICES. Use email
providers that allow an authentication from anywhere
On 2013-11-23 19:38, Philipp Winter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 02:22:48PM +, Mark McCarron wrote:
How about a certification program? A company can donate some
funds to have their product evaluated and if successful gain
TOR Certified status. It would stop all this nonsense and
provide
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 01:25:37PM +, Gibson, Aaron wrote:
On 2013-11-23 19:38, Philipp Winter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 02:22:48PM +, Mark McCarron wrote:
How about a certification program? A company can donate some
funds to have their product evaluated and if successful gain
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013, at 01:14 PM, Leo Unglaub wrote:
Hey
On 2013-11-23 22:04, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
What about when using TBB is desired, but sites (say web mail)
won't accept addresses from countries other than used to sign up?
the solution is simple. DONT USE THOSE FUCKED UP SERVICES.
On 11/25/2013 7:14 AM, Leo Unglaub wrote:
the solution is simple. DONT USE THOSE FUCKED UP SERVICES. Use email
providers that allow an authentication from anywhere like every
provider is supposed to do.
Greetings
Leo
It's not only F'g email that won't allow from some *-stan or African
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Tempest temp...@tushmail.com wrote:
hi, conrad. awhile ago, you'd mentioned you were working on a hidden
service e-mail system. i was wondering if you had made any progress on it.
-
Hello Tempest,
Basically
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Sebastian G. bastik.tor
bastik@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
beside having each authority call in for their vote about the random
string, how about including a string in the consensus not under control
by any authority?
For example a hash from the bitcoin
Conrad Rockenhaus:
If you have it laying around, I'm interested. Would you mind
uploading it to GitHub or emailing it to me so I can upload it to
GitHub (credits to you of course.)
I would mind uploading it to GitHub. Benjamin Mako Hill wrote a nice
rationale about it:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Nick Mathewson ni...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Sebastian G. bastik.tor
bastik@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
beside having each authority call in for their vote about the random
string, how about including a string in the
On Sun, 2013-11-24 at 21:54 -0500, Yo Mamma wrote:
Hi Joe,
I'll clarify the auto-login: After sign up it logged me in with the
credentials I had just created. Why would it use cookies from a previous,
different account login, to log in to this new account? Wouldn't that be a
security hole?
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Lunar lu...@torproject.org wrote:
Conrad Rockenhaus:
If you have it laying around, I'm interested. Would you mind
uploading it to GitHub or emailing it to me so I can upload it to
GitHub (credits to you of course.)
I would mind uploading it to GitHub.
On Sat, Nov 23 2013, to_delete wrote:
Hi,
This is a bit OT, but it might be of interest here, too.
I don't know whether you follow the GnuPG mailing lists, but in case you
missed it: there has been a dispute between Richard Stallman and Werner
Koch on a license change for the GNU Privacy
Mike Cardwell:
* on the Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 06:17:24PM +, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
You shouldn't just route people through Tor without their knowledge.
They need to understand the risks and adapt their use accordingly.
And what is the risk of barebacking with a network?
When your
On Mon Nov 25 18:10:44 UTC 2013, Nick Mathewson nickm at alum.mit.edu wrote:
So unless I'm missing my guess, the cost of setting N bits of the hash
with probability P here is equal to the cost of generating a target
bitcoin block with probability P, times 2^N ?
If this factor (2^N) is
Topposting cause I'm tired and lazy. Sorry.
So I designed exactly this type of thing
c. fifteen years ago. Cf.
Weakly Secret Bit Commitment: Applications to Lotteries and Fair Exchange
and a journal version of some of that in
Temporarily Hidden Bit Commitment and Lottery Applications
Also, Roger
16 matches
Mail list logo
