You can build as soon as the tree is frozen in hg. You’ll have to watch in case
an emergency build 2 or 3 happens, which does occur, but you could build six to
seven days before Firefox is released, which is what we do in order to give our
QA time. All that happens on release day is we push to m
??
Mozilla runs a completely open, documented, and transparent release process.
The dates are published basically six months in advance (and more like a year
if you count in six week increments). We’ve moved one date (the next one) in
the last 18 months, I think. See https://wiki.mozilla.org/Ra
* Al Billings [2013:12:11 17:38 -0800]:
> Anyone paying attention knows there is a delta between TBB and Mozilla
> releases. I can’t comment on why that’s the case as I don’t know the TBB
> build, QA, or releases processes.
To help clarify this situation a bit for everyone (since I have been mak
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:41:32PM +, adrela...@riseup.net wrote 2.0K bytes
in 0 lines about:
: Let's forget about the technical questions whether it's possible to
: route all bittorrent traffic over Tor without leaks or not on focus on
: the ethical question.
My opinion is if you're going to
bm-2d9whbg2vekslcsgbtplgwdlqypizsq...@bitmessage.ch:
> Perhaps my experience was unique or users are to blame for their own
> laziness in staying up-to-date, but I hope we can agree that making it
> easier for TBB users to run the latest available Firefox code 95 or 99% of
> the time could still be
> Again, I wonder what youâre doing to fix this issue or is this really
> just an informational awareness campaign?
I don't have any easy solutions to offer, but was hoping to start a
conversation about figuring some out. I was hoping there would be some
value in raising the issue. Understanding
I’ll also add that a two or three day delta on releases (which is most of those
listed) is pretty damned good.
The bugs in those releases aren’t public. Diffing changes and trying to
contract zero days is actually quite hard as well. If you were talking about a
month long difference in dates, I
Again, I wonder what you’re doing to fix this issue or is this really just an
informational awareness campaign?
Anyone paying attention knows there is a delta between TBB and Mozilla
releases. I can’t comment on why that’s the case as I don’t know the TBB build,
QA, or releases processes.
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I would agree with the bandwidth issue, as many people find the Tor
network slow as it is already. I would recommend adding an i2p router
if people want to torrent. I2P doesn't seem to have a problem with it,
and has a torrent client packaged in by d
My point was that users may not be aware of the possibilities of "looking
at checkins, code changes, and binary diffs" even though it can affect
their anonymity quite significantly. It doesn't seem crazy for users to
assume that the latest version of a piece of software based on Firefox
would gener
Yes but good luck with that. Mozilla and Tor are both aware of the
possibilities involving looking at checkins, code changes, and binary diffs.
From: bm-2d9whbg2vekslcsgbtplgwdlqypizsq...@bitmessage.ch
bm-2d9whbg2vekslcsgbtplgwdlqypizsq...@bitmessage.ch
An adversary could potentially dig throug
> Hello,
>
> Firefox ESR 17.0.11 indeed turns out (somewhat confusingly) to beÂ
> equivalent to Firefox ESR 24.1.1, and the TBB based on ESR 17.0.11 wasÂ
> released only four days after Mozilla's updates, which frankly deservesÂ
> praise. TBB's latest code is only one release behind Mozilla's o
Hi!
Let's forget about the technical questions whether it's possible to
route all bittorrent traffic over Tor without leaks or not on focus on
the ethical question.
There are quite a few contradicting statements from the Tor core
people [1] about that.
With my Whonix hat on, would you prefer if
Hello,
Firefox ESR 17.0.11 indeed turns out (somewhat confusingly) to be
equivalent to Firefox ESR 24.1.1, and the TBB based on ESR 17.0.11 was
released only four days after Mozilla's updates, which frankly deserves
praise. TBB's latest code is only one release behind Mozilla's on security
pat
Thanks for catching my mistake. Firefox ESR 17.0.11 still leaves TBB users
vulnerable to (from
https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefoxESR.html):
Fixed in Firefox ESR 24.2
MFSA 2013-117 Mis-issued ANSSI/DCSSI certificate
MFSA 2013-116 JPEG information leak
MFSA 2013-115 GetE
bm-2d9whbg2vekslcsgbtplgwdlqypizsq...@bitmessage.ch:
> The version of Firefox incorporated into the Tor Browser Bundle (TBB)
> available via torproject.org is currently multiple releases behind both
> Firefox ESR and Firefox. The latest-available Tor Browser Bundles
> generally include versions of
The version of Firefox incorporated into the Tor Browser Bundle (TBB)
available via torproject.org is currently multiple releases behind both
Firefox ESR and Firefox. The latest-available Tor Browser Bundles
generally include versions of Firefox ESR that do not include patches for
publicly known se
HI ; i am a student in networking and security system, i working in a
project to make a global private navigation to web by create a
distribution based in Ubuntu . the project will include more interesting
tools to make a secure connection with servers like a private cloud
computing ,also a secur
Hi,
the webpage www.torproject.org and git.torproject.org,
lists.torproject.org support Forward secrecy using 1024-bit DH group.
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=www.torproject.org&s=38.229.72.16
According to ECRYPT II Recommendations (2012) and NIST Recommendations
(2012) Diffie-
Tor Weekly News December 11th, 2013
Welcome to the twenty-fourth issue of Tor Weekly News, the weekly
newsletter th
* on the Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 02:01:34AM +0100, t...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
>> Exim or postfix are not so hard to learn and roundcube is pretty
>> easy to install :)
>
> Postfix does not work with tor.
>
> There are a few problems:
>
> - Postfix does not have a SOCKS4a proxy option (in fact,
21 matches
Mail list logo
