Gerardus Hendricks wrote:
PGP: 0xf4b6586f
What is the binary logarithm of sixteen to the power of eight?
How long does it take to generate a fresh RSA keypair?
Are the last eight bytes of keyids evenly distributed?
Now you are just getting snooty!
Jim
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@li
> don't exclude it at all. For example it can be a very hidden malware
> that not detected by antivirus and it will be enable to invisibly
> communicate with it's "second part" when you visit some web-sites
> because it doesn't need in allowing rules in system firewall.
Yes, but see what the desig
Lol (this is a very sincere and kind type of laugh, which much much empathy)
Julie Chartier
On Jan 22, 2014 4:30 AM, "Julie Chartier" wrote:
> Portsnt
> is my daughter still with you? such a great job I am really proud of you
> you scared the deal scared the living daylights out of me
> can't wa
Portsnt
is my daughter still with you? such a great job I am really proud of you
you scared the deal scared the living daylights out of me
can't wait to hear about it.
Oh, and Melissa.
Julie Chartier
On Jan 22, 2014 1:13 AM, "Jim" wrote:
> Gerardus Hendricks wrote:
>
>> PGP: 0xf4b6586f
>>>
>>
>
On 1/22/14 7:31 AM, Jim wrote:
Now you are just getting snooty!
That might indeed be "snobbish", although I was trying to illustrative.
Was is wrong though?
Regards,
Gerard
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.to
Hi all,
a recurring discussion happening is related to the integrity of the
operating system and application.
Those kind of problem could in theory be fixed with proper use of
Trusted Computing support today present in nearly all computer's hardware.
I noticed some very interesting area such as
Tor Weekly News January 22nd, 2014
Welcome to the third issue in 2014 of Tor Weekly News, the weekly
newsletter t
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 04:30:21AM -0600, jewelscharti...@gmail.com wrote 0.9K
bytes in 0 lines about:
:
[snip]
: Oh, and Melissa.
Let's keep on topic. Take personal issues offline. Thanks.
--
Andrew
http://tpo.is/contact
pgp 0x6B4D6475
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.or
On 01/22/14 03:53, krishna e bera wrote:
> On 14-01-21 07:32 PM, r...@goodvikings.com wrote:
>> http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/01/scientists-detect-spoiled-onions-trying-to-sabotage-tor-privacy-network/
>
> thanks, added it to
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/badRelays
>
Il 22/01/2014 12:40, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) ha scritto:
> I'm wondering if, within anonymity community, the trusted computing
> technologies hasn't been evaluated properly for the values that it could
> be provide in terms of operating system and application integrity.
In terms of security, the
The more I read about various exit node exploits, the more convinced I
am that Tor's future is in beefing up hidden service functions and
keeping as much traffic as possible within the Tor network.
I hope that the Tor developers see this the same way. Expanding the
usefulness of hidden services is
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 03:36:10PM +, Elysius wrote:
> The more I read about various exit node exploits, the more convinced I
> am that Tor's future is in beefing up hidden service functions and
> keeping as much traffic as possible within the Tor network.
These weren't really exploits, just s
I have a basic question about the Spoiled Onions report. The bad onions
mean that someone could block traffic, could re-direct traffic, or
otherwise censor content, but they couldn't de-anonymize users nor could
they prevent user from re-connecting to Tor network with different nodes.
Do I underst
http://dev.maxmind.com/faq/what-are-the-a1-anonymous-proxy-entries/
You'll also want to browse the links up top such
as minfraud, chargeback, proxy reporting, vpn, etc.
The v2 may help a bit since anyone converting to it
may not have actually been blocking on A1/A2 but
on !ISOlist or !alpha or !US
On 01/22/2014 12:40 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> I'm wondering if, within anonymity community, the trusted computing
> technologies hasn't been evaluated properly for the values that it could
> be provide in terms of operating system and application integrity.
+1
Pond uses the TPM.
It i
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:30:09AM -0500, William Conlow wrote:
> I have a basic question about the Spoiled Onions report. The bad onions
> mean that someone could block traffic, could re-direct traffic, or
> otherwise censor content, but they couldn't de-anonymize users nor could
> they prevent us
>> I'm wondering if, within anonymity community, the trusted computing
>> technologies hasn't been evaluated properly for the values that it could
>> be provide in terms of operating system and application integrity.
>
> +1
>
> Pond uses the TPM.
StrongSwan and FreeRadius use TCG's TNC.
Both TPM
How can I comnect with tori ?
Hi. Will you give my daughter
A message as she hasnt see seemed to be able to hear me.I really hope this
upco coming year will be different you're young lady we missed last year
together.I will be here for you forever. I really hope to see are you'm c I
really need to
18 matches
Mail list logo
