On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:46:32PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
So many sites that we all use are now blacklisting Tor. It's unclear
whether it is via their use of tools that blindly utilize blacklists,
or if they are making a conscious choice to deny Tor users. As far
as I'm concerned, we are all
This message was reported by the Doctor:
NOTICE: The following directory authorities recommend other client versions
than the consensus: gabelmoo +0.2.2.39 +0.2.4.15-rc +0.2.4.5-alpha +0.2.4.6-
alpha +0.2.4.7-alpha +0.2.4.10-alpha +0.2.4.12-alpha +0.2.4.13-alpha
+0.2.4.14-alpha +0.2.4.9-alpha
grarpamp:
So many sites that we all use are now blacklisting Tor. It's unclear
whether it is via their use of tools that blindly utilize blacklists,
or if they are making a conscious choice to deny Tor users. As far
as I'm concerned, we are all legitimate users of their services and
quite
Hi,
On 07 Feb 2014, at 08:05, tor-admin tor-ad...@torland.me wrote:
This message was reported by the Doctor:
NOTICE: The following directory authorities recommend other client versions
than the consensus: gabelmoo +0.2.2.39 +0.2.4.15-rc +0.2.4.5-alpha +0.2.4.6-
alpha +0.2.4.7-alpha
Hi,
On 06.02.2014 21:20, David Balažic wrote:
I now tried a clean installation of TBB 3.5.1 win32
I change the option from Never remember history to Remember History.
It requested a restart.
Then I checked and it was Use custom settings for history.
I looked at the TorButton extension
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:33:08AM -0800, Al Jigong Billings wrote:
Or maybe people got tired of the minority of trolls and nazis that seem to
come through Tor to infest some sites. I know people who block Tor. It is
usually because a disproportionate amount of the abuse on their site comes
What can we do, as a collective social entity, to put an end to
this madness? It is not as if we, as Tor users, present any more
of a load upon their help/fraud/abuse desks than the wider open
internet as a whole, even when if perhaps adjusted for market share
of source IP's. So what can we
On Friday 07 February 2014 09:50:52 Sebastian Hahn wrote:
The idea is to recommend all versions which aren't known to be bad, so
that an operator who reads their Tor logs will realize their Tor really
needs to be upgraded in order to remain secure/operational when theysee
it. So, if an -rc
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:14:28PM +0100, tor-admin wrote:
Sebastian, thanks for clarification. I remember there were some late changes
#9063, #9072, #9093, and #10169 which made it into 2.4.X because of the DOS
issues Rob Jansen described in https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hmmm... I've been thinking about all this stuff, and reading up on the
PDFs.
I think the parrot is dead is a little over strict in his analysis,
I highly doubt they have technology as good as this yet and probably
wont have any time soon, so yes in
grarpamp:
So many sites that we all use are now blacklisting Tor. It's unclear
whether it is via their use of tools that blindly utilize blacklists,
or if they are making a conscious choice to deny Tor users. As far
as I'm concerned, we are all legitimate users of their services and
quite
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 02:00:02 -0500
Soul Plane soulplan...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it ok to use the Tor Browser without Tor? I don't need Tor but I like
the privacy features that the browser offers.
Yes you can. I use that way for transparent torifycation in Linux,
manually restarting Browser and
Hulu requires JavaScript to work properly.
If you enable JavaScript when visiting the site
does that not defeat the purpose of using TOR?
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:54:41 -0700
Joshua Datko jbda...@gmail.com wrote:
As I tried to watch Family Guy, I received this message from Hulu:
Based
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:46:32PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
So many sites that we all use are now blacklisting Tor. It's unclear
whether it is via their use of tools that blindly utilize blacklists,
or if they are making a conscious choice to deny Tor users. As far
as I'm concerned, we are all
On 2/7/2014 12:42 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
This is in re: Hulu (whis is presumably authenticated)... but really,
it applies to any service which we, the legitimate users of Tor,
are denied access to.
It has simply gone too far and we should be putting effort into
reversing this trend by
Doesn’t streaming HD video through Tor degrade the entire network?
From: Missouri Anglers Missouri Anglers
Reply: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Date: February 7, 2014 at 12:11:23 PM
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re:
The Doctor wrote:
tor-admin wrote:
This message was reported by the Doctor:
...I said what?
Nymspace collision is a real problem, folks!
~Saint ^H^H^H Griffin
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2014 12:50 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
Nymspace collision is a real problem, folks!
Another agument for PGP signing everything...
And now, back on topic for this mailing list.
- --
The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS]
Developer, Project
On 02/07/2014 01:55 PM, James Marshall wrote:
As others have pointed out, the fact (?) that Tor users are no more likely
to abuse may not matter as much as the *perception* that they are. However
unfairly, the perception of something often carries the day more than the
facts, and should be
Make that why blocking Tor exits is largely pointless.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
20 matches
Mail list logo
