Just missing the news deadline, a report on Tails' contribution to
journalism:
https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/blog/2014/04/help-support-little-known-privacy-tool-has-been-critical-journalists-reporting-nsa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
tor-talk mailing list - to
nb.linux:
> Mike Perry:
> > anonymous coward:
> >> My special concern is about the baseband CPU. The baseband potentially
> >> allows full access to the whole system. And the baseband is closed source.
> >>
> >> Thus, the baseband is the perfect trojan for "them". I asked a phone
> >> maker that ma
David Rajchenbach-Teller:
> As a side-note, there is a will to make FirefoxOS very safe, but as far
> as I know, very few people work on this actively at the moment. If you
> are interested in contributing to this effort, I can try and find you a
> good interlocutor.
I looked into this and made co
I no longer have access to the machine where this issue was produced. I've
advised the owner to reimage their system. I'll file the ticket all the
same with these details in case someone else reproduces it or it recurs
after reinstall.
--lee
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:09 PM, lee colleton wrote:
> Additionally, a popup appears during the debug launch which says "Profile
> Missing: Your Firefox profile cannot be loaded. It may be missing or
> inaccessible." That message doesn't appear with the launch via GUI and also
> the message about
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 04:30:42 grarpamp wrote:
> Given current onion discovery mechanics as in the paper, public vs.
> private is defined largely by the access restrictions operators put
> up, not by whether they posted the address somewhere or not.
> (descriptor-cookie and stealth auth may ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/02/2014 06:52 PM, anonymous coward wrote:
> to me the Orweb simply is not usable at all. No tabbed browsing, no
> bookmarks.
It was by choice that we kept it simple as possible. You open a link,
browser some, close the browser, and it goes away.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/02/2014 07:01 PM, anonymous coward wrote:
> Many people use TOR or secure ways to chat on smartphones.
>
> The last months have reveiled how hard secret services attack our
> phones.
>
> This leads me to the question, how secure are our smartph
On 04/03/2014 06:21 AM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:52:45PM +, anonymous.cow...@posteo.de wrote
> 1.9K bytes in 0 lines about:
> : Thus, is there plans to create a Firefox for mobile that is safe to use
> : with Tor? Just like the browser bundle for desktop systems.
>
>
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:52:45PM +, anonymous.cow...@posteo.de wrote 1.9K
bytes in 0 lines about:
: Thus, is there plans to create a Firefox for mobile that is safe to use
: with Tor? Just like the browser bundle for desktop systems.
Guardian recommends using Firefox with Proxymob. They don
As a side-note, there is a will to make FirefoxOS very safe, but as far
as I know, very few people work on this actively at the moment. If you
are interested in contributing to this effort, I can try and find you a
good interlocutor.
Cheers,
David
On 4/3/14 10:53 AM, nb.linux wrote:
> In case yo
Mike Perry:
>> Many people use TOR or secure ways to chat on smartphones.
>>
>> The last months have reveiled how hard secret services attack our phones.
>>
>> This leads me to the question, how secure are our smartphones at all?
>
> Not very, or not at all, depending on your threat model.
That m
Mike Perry:
> anonymous coward:
>> My special concern is about the baseband CPU. The baseband potentially
>> allows full access to the whole system. And the baseband is closed source.
>>
>> Thus, the baseband is the perfect trojan for "them". I asked a phone
>> maker that makes "cryptophones" what
13 matches
Mail list logo
