On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 4/9/2014 1:29 PM, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
>>
>> It seems no one wants to talk or hear about this issue. It is not being
>> reported on media sites or anywhere else, other than the Heartbleed site,
>> and the OpenSSL lists
>
> It's all o
On 4/9/2014 11:21 AM, s...@sky-ip.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have upgraded to latest Tor Browser Bundle version: 3.5.4 - Windows
32 bit.
My operating system is Windows 8.1 Pro Enterprise, 64 bit.
The odd things i have noticed (which didn't happen in previ
On 4/9/2014 1:29 PM, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
It seems no one wants to talk or hear about this issue. It is not
being reported on media sites or anywhere else, other than the
Heartbleed site, and the OpenSSL lists
It's all over the internet, when I look in Ixquick / Startpage.
Possible t
On 4/9/2014 12:36 PM, Andrew F wrote:
Would be interesting if someone created an app to test for the problem and
then published which big websites are slow to upgrade.
that would certainly be good for consumers.
Well, one website sorta has. They seem to have more extensive testing
for overall s
Mike Perry:
> At this point, you will see a FIN ACK or RST ACK packet appear in your
> tcpdump window. That packet has leaked past the iptables firewall rules,
> and past the transproxy rules. It went straight to Google.
Can you post an example log please how it's the tcpdump output is
looking whe
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:07:11PM -0400, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
> On 4/9/2014 3:04 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:
> >On 4/9/2014 2:29 PM, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
> >
> >>This bug has been a known issue for about 2 years, and we are only now
> >>learning about it.
> >
> >The bug has existed f
Has this bug been reported upstream against the Linux kernel on kernel.org?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On 4/9/2014 2:49 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:29:19PM -0400, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
It seems no one wants to talk or hear about this issue. It is not
being reported on media sites or anywhere else, other than the
Heartbleed site, and the OpenSSL lists.
And FD... and
On 4/9/2014 2:29 PM, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
> This bug has been a known issue for about 2 years, and we are only now
> learning about it.
The bug has existed for about 2 years, but was not a "known issue"
before the last week or so. (Excluding, of course, criminals and such
who may have f
On 4/9/2014 3:04 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:
On 4/9/2014 2:29 PM, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
This bug has been a known issue for about 2 years, and we are only now
learning about it.
The bug has existed for about 2 years, but was not a "known issue"
before the last week or so. (Excluding, of
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:29:19PM -0400, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
> It seems no one wants to talk or hear about this issue. It is not
> being reported on media sites or anywhere else, other than the
> Heartbleed site, and the OpenSSL lists.
And FD... and arstechnica... and Heise...
> This
On 4/9/2014 12:57 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 4/8/2014 5:24 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 4/8/2014 4:25 PM, grarpamp wrote:
https://blog.torproject.org/ covers what to do for Tor things.
.snip.
http://s3.jspenguin.org/ssltest.py
https://gist.github.com/takeshixx/10107280
https://github.com/FiloSot
Abel Luck:
> On Saturday 29 March 2014 03:10:47 grarpamp wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:20 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> > > grarpamp wrote (28 Mar 2014 21:02:35 GMT) :
> > >> [...] what happens with entire vm IP transproxy (perhaps like
> > >> Tails)?
> > >
> > > Tails only uses a transproxy for
Would be interesting if someone created an app to test for the problem and
then published which big websites are slow to upgrade.
that would certainly be good for consumers.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 4/8/2014 5:24 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
>
>> On 4/8/2014 4:25 PM, gr
On 4/8/2014 5:24 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 4/8/2014 4:25 PM, grarpamp wrote:
https://blog.torproject.org/ covers what to do for Tor things.
For everything else on the net, fix the clients and servers you're
responsible for. Then...
You're right, there's a big gotcha in all this, users won't r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have upgraded to latest Tor Browser Bundle version: 3.5.4 - Windows
32 bit.
My operating system is Windows 8.1 Pro Enterprise, 64 bit.
The odd things i have noticed (which didn't happen in previous
versions) are:
1. Some kind of cookie / se
On 4/9/2014 4:52 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:32:08AM +, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
I downloaded the right archive and overwrote the existing folder
(3.5.3). Restarted and the yellow triangle is still there. On the upper
right corner it's written 3.5.4, yet the welco
Tor Weekly News April 9th, 2014
Welcome to the fourteenth issue of Tor Weekly News in 2014, the weekly
newslett
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:32:08AM +, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
> I downloaded the right archive and overwrote the existing folder
> (3.5.3). Restarted and the yellow triangle is still there. On the upper
> right corner it's written 3.5.4, yet the welcome page says:
>
> > HOWEVER, this browser
I downloaded the right archive and overwrote the existing folder
(3.5.3). Restarted and the yellow triangle is still there. On the upper
right corner it's written 3.5.4, yet the welcome page says:
> HOWEVER, this browser is out of date.
Am I doing something wrong?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-
20 matches
Mail list logo
