On 07/15/2014 06:29 AM, Red Sonja wrote:
>>> But when most people ask the answers are like this. How's
>>> «properly configured»? How do I know it is properly
>>> configured?
>>
>> Ultimately, you know that when it works, and it doesn't leak, no
>> matter how you try to break it. Sorry :(
>
>
Michael Carbone wrote (15 Jul 2014 19:11:15 GMT) :
> https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/code/parcimonie/
Currently down => better install from Debian (if using this
distribution, or a derivative) or get the source from
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/parcimonie
Cheers,
--
intriger
grarpamp:
>> keyserver-options http-proxy=socks5://127.0.0.1:9150
>
> A socks5 service is not an http proxy service, privoxy is.
Yet this is what the gpg.conf of the TorBirdy github notes.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproj
Rejo Zenger:
> ++ 15/07/14 14:09 -0400 - grarpamp:
>>> secured server. Or anybody can see your whole addressbook. So it is a
>>> secured server. But still, it is quite obvious who am I just by looking
>>> at that list. So I figured out, maybe if I push the refresh through Tor,
>>> talking with a se
Michael Carbone:
> It sounds like you'd be interested in Parcimonie:
>
> https://github.com/EtiennePerot/parcimonie.sh
> https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/code/parcimonie/
Which one to use?
> It is a script to refresh your keyring over Tor without disclosing your
> entire keyring to th
On 7/16/14, Red Sonja
wrote:
> Rejo Zenger:
>> ++ 15/07/14 14:09 -0400 - grarpamp:
secured server. Or anybody can see your whole addressbook. So it is a
secured server. But still, it is quite obvious who am I just by looking
at that list. So I figured out, maybe if I push the refres
Mirimir:
>>> Ultimately, you know that when it works, and it doesn't leak, no
>>> matter how you try to break it. Sorry :(
>>
>> No matter? Like using a credit card or just your real address?
>
> When you're testing, you don't reveal anything that matters.
Right. When I am testing. But for me the
Hi,
I'am working on a HowTo for an end-to-end-encrypted email service
(https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorCitadel). It will
receive mails via SMTP as a TOR hidden service. Unfortunately
SMTP-clients do not support SOCKS for outgoing connections. I'd be glad
for any input fro
Red Sonja:
> Rejo Zenger:
> > ++ 15/07/14 14:09 -0400 - grarpamp:
> >>> secured server. Or anybody can see your whole addressbook. So it is a
> >>> secured server. But still, it is quite obvious who am I just by looking
> >>> at that list. So I figured out, maybe if I push the refresh through Tor,
I am a big fan of pinkmeth hidden service ( hxxp://pinkmethuylnenlz.onion/ )
But it constantly times out.
As an unix administrator, I was thinking in ways to escalate such good
public services through normal clusters, and would like opinions if my
approach is valid, to suggest it to the unknown a
intrigeri:
> Michael Carbone wrote (15 Jul 2014 19:11:15 GMT) :
>> https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/code/parcimonie/
>
> Currently down => better install from Debian (if using this
> distribution, or a derivative) or get the source from
> https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/parcimoni
Red Sonja wrote (16 Jul 2014 11:58:41 GMT) :
> Do you have anything less demanding?
*I* haven't. See the shell version, linked by Michael earlier on this
thread. I haven't looked at it in details, no idea if it satisfies the
same design goals etc.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
tor-talk mailing list -
Tor Weekly News July 16th, 2014
Welcome to the sixteenth issue of Tor Weekly News in 2014, the weekly
newslette
> Hi,
>
> I'am working on a HowTo for an end-to-end-encrypted email service
> (https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorCitadel). It will
> receive mails via SMTP as a TOR hidden service. Unfortunately
> SMTP-clients do not support SOCKS for outgoing connections. I'd be glad
> for any i
Fosforo wrote:
> I am a big fan of pinkmeth hidden service
Then I question your ethics. Nonconsensual porn is an extreme
violation of someone's trust -- not to mention gross and illegal. It's
also a slap in the face to people who run hidden services because their
free speech rights are being vio
>* Find a better network for the servers and instead of doing 'nginx -> tor
-> apache' just go 'nginx -> apache'. You can of course still use SSL to
encrypt the data
>inbetween. This reduces a lot of latency.
>* Rather than putting everything on a single domain, just put only the
HTML on the prima
Fosforo schreef op 16/07/14 14:15:
I am a big fan of pinkmeth hidden service ( hxxp://pinkmethuylnenlz.onion/ )
But it constantly times out.
As an unix administrator, I was thinking in ways to escalate such good
public services through normal clusters, and would like opinions if my
approach is
Joe Btfsplk:
> Has anyone experienced crashes when closing TBB, as described here?
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/10761#comment:5
>
> It happens almost every session, if I load pages in TBB.
> For me, it happens even if not restoring tabs / windows, as the bug OP
> mentioned (I
alaa mub:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm doing some research on Tor identification, and it seems that Tor recently
> implemented different type of defenses by enabling HTTP pipelining, padding,
> and packet relaying and randomizing the pipeline size as well as the order of
> requests. which one of these are
On 07/16/2014 05:58 AM, Red Sonja wrote:
> intrigeri:
>> Michael Carbone wrote (15 Jul 2014 19:11:15 GMT) :
>>> https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/code/parcimonie/
>>
>> Currently down => better install from Debian (if using this
>> distribution, or a derivative) or get the source from
On 07/16/2014 04:18 AM, Red Sonja wrote:
> Mirimir:
Ultimately, you know that when it works, and it doesn't leak, no
matter how you try to break it. Sorry :(
>>>
>>> No matter? Like using a credit card or just your real address?
>>
>> When you're testing, you don't reveal anything that ma
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:10 -0400, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Fosforo wrote:
> > I am a big fan of pinkmeth hidden service
>
> Then I question your ethics. Nonconsensual porn is an extreme
> violation of someone's trust -- not to mention gross and illegal. It's
> also a slap in the face to people wh
On 7/16/2014 6:28 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:10 -0400, Griffin Boyce wrote:
Fosforo wrote:
I am a big fan of pinkmeth hidden service
Then I question your ethics. Nonconsensual porn is an extreme
violation of someone's trust -- not to mention gross and illegal. It's
also a
23 matches
Mail list logo
