Paolo Cardullo:
This was an interesting discussion.
I was just thinking of starting a thread on why people use the
appellative 'dark' as for 'dark net'. I found it quite disturbing and
offensive, also in a racialised way.
[...]
I strongly disagree and I suggest to drop 'dark' from TOR
If an expensive marketing company were trying to come up with a term to
describe more anonymous networks such as .onion, even though dark net
certainly fits, they would probably discourage it because of the reasons
previously mentioned.
I don't like deep web, and I think we can do better than
Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org wrote:
Virgil wrote:
Turn your website into an onionsite
Access the onionsite in the same way you access a website
It could be technically consistent to say both hidden services and
onion sites -- you could say that onion sites are web sites that are
served
Roger Dingledine wrote:
I'm pretty sure by now if you say onion service people will know what
you mean, so that might be another vote in its favor.
onion service looks nice. Not all onion services are location hidden
servers. Some use it as an alternative domain.
--
tor-talk mailing list -
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:08:49PM -0300, hellekin wrote:
I use onionspace regularly, and find onion service and onion site
equally attractive. Just wanted to remind you that not all onion
services are websites.
The term onion service could supersede hidden service and an onion
site could
On 11/15/2014 03:25 AM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
If an expensive marketing company were trying to come up with a term to
describe more anonymous networks such as .onion, even though dark net
certainly fits, they would probably discourage it because of the reasons
previously mentioned.
I don't
On 15/11/14 08:42, Katya Titov wrote:
I opened a lengthy discussion about this in January:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-January/thread.html#31863
No real outcome.
The name is what it is, and I think it's stuck.
Katia, thanks very much for pointing to the
I like that because it is a simple and undramatic description which doesn't
encourage suspicion and hyperbole.
Robert
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:08:49PM -0300, hellekin wrote:
I use onionspace regularly, and find onion service and onion site
equally attractive. Just wanted to remind you
Good.
? tornet or torweb ?
Robert
-V
How about ornet and/or orweb?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On 15 Nov 2014, at 19:05, Philipp Winter p...@nymity.ch wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:08:49PM -0300, hellekin wrote:
I use onionspace regularly, and find onion service and onion site
equally attractive. Just wanted to remind you that not all onion
services are websites.
The term onion
On 11/15/2014 03:48 PM, I wrote:
Good.
? tornet or torweb ?
Anything with tor is out, I think. Even though location hidden
services are in fact part of the tor package, while Tor Browser and
Tor Cloud are not. Still, using or as the prefix is more general
than tor, and could apply to anything
I think the problem is you can't use plain english.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Katya, and all,
So why don't we use sensible, plain language and stick to it to
distuingish ourselves from them?
Hacker wouldn't have the currency it has if a large part of the pudgy,
pizza-eating photophobes didn't perpetuate it for dramatic self-interest.
Robert
I think the use
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Virgil Griffith wrote:
If an expensive marketing company were trying to come up with a term to
describe more anonymous networks such as .onion, even though dark net
certainly fits, they would probably discourage it because of the reasons
previously mentioned.
I don't
I wrote:
Katya, and all,
So why don't we use sensible, plain language and stick to it
to distuingish ourselves from them?
This article (German) has just been published which is quite
dispassionate and factual, avoiding hype. This is the type of
explanation and coverage that (I think)
Robert wrote
Hacker wouldn't have the currency it has if a large part of the
pudgy, pizza-eating photophobes didn't perpetuate it for dramatic
self-interest.
Katya wrote
I really don't think comments like this help the situation.
Certainly.
I meant to highlight that the desire for loaded
16 matches
Mail list logo
