> Perhaps the new implementation of the hidden services will be better
?
> How is it going ?
I don't see anything in the improvements suggested for hidden services
that would help this situation. Though I would be grateful for being
corrected.
First, I just want to say I only meant sheep(s) to e
On 2014-12-02 02:51, Mirimir wrote:
On 12/01/2014 03:44 PM, fuckyouhost...@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
On 2014-12-01 07:55, Mirimir wrote:
On 12/01/2014 12:13 AM, fuckyouhost...@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
On 2014-12-01 02:24, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
On 01/12/14 14:46, fuckyouhost...@ruggedinbox.com
Yes the site is working fine if i access with with normal browser (without
Tor) in my localhost, but only markup (html) loads up when tried with Tor
browser. And on normal browser i open it with name like 'http://localhost'
and i believe this has default 80 port.
And here are my HiddenServicePort
Fine I'll remove the replies.
If a normal browser--without Tor works. Then don't worry about the
rules I mentioned.
If the only problem is you get a broken site using the onion address.
Then what is your HiddenServicePort in torrc.
Finally. In a normal browser--without Tor. Do you connect using
Hi, those are not good results. I recommend trying a couple more tests
on panopticlick.
1. After maximizing, then closing, then reopening Tor-Browser, it
resizes automatically--after a couple seconds. Test at this window
size.
2. Use Tor-Button to change identities. The window should resize
automa
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Hi Leroy,
[1]https://panopticlick.eff.org
I did a little testing:
using it after Tor Browser has stated, I get:
... only one in 949,593 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.
and
Screen Size and Color Depth: 1000x865x24
With full screen I get:
... only one in 1,186,992 browsers have the
