Re: [tor-talk] TorBirdy seems to connect to the same exit node again and again

2015-04-24 Thread Sophie Hassfurther
Hi Leeroy, Yes, Atlas was a poor choice. Before you suggested searching the log through Terminal, I wasn't even thinking of that possibility. As for improvements: I think a) would be quite important. Using a better port worked, as far as I can tell, and I was not aware that I put myself in a very

Re: [tor-talk] TorBirdy seems to connect to the same exit node again and again

2015-04-24 Thread teor
> > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:06:09 -0400 > From: "l.m" > > Hi Sophie, > > … > When using Tor Browser, the tor process is kind enough to take notice > when using certain ports (WarnPlaintextPorts). So maybe TorBirdy > should do the same. That is to say, make TorBirdy more verbose about > choic

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread aka
The common user does not apply to all threat models. If you are a high volume recreational drug salesman, you must expect 0days and snitches. If you however are merely a recreational drug consumer, Tor can cover all of your security risks, because only low cost automated investigation will be used

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread Speak Freely
Désolé, mais je pense que vous êtes un chapeau de cul. aka: <... long string of bullshit...> -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread aka
Sorry, I forgot to add a trigger warning for you sensitive social justice warriors. Please keep discussion in English and desist from using personal insults or other ad-hominem arguments on tor-talk. Speak Freely wrote: > Désolé, mais je pense que vous êtes un chapeau de cul. > > > aka: > <... l

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread tor
On 04/24/2015 06:46 PM, aka wrote: > buying recreational drugs and watching censored adult > porn (which honestly is 90% of Tor's current userbase anyway) Speak for yourself. (Because, right. Clearly it has proven technically feasible for you to survey Tor's users (and/or traffic) to determi

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread aka
[TRIGGER WARNING] Outgoing traffic stats from Tor exit nodes. Almost all traffic of Chinese speaking Tor users is average adult porn, which is banned in China. You can tell it's from China because the sites are aimed to Hong Kong residents. The "Chinese people use Tor because they are supressed in

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread Speak Freely
In a word, "No." I think it's cute you get to post unsubstantiated claims against an entire group of people, while expecting to be treated individually special, while talking explicitly and directly to the people you are making the claims against. The next time you try to dictate to me how to tal

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread Allen
More wanking = fewer wars, so that is a need, IMO, along with food, water, shelter and medical care. Beyond that, define "need". Privacy and freedom from government and corporate surveillance are fundamental rights, IMO. Keeping your internet activity private from your ISP and the world-at-large

[tor-talk] current policy on: giving entire families the badexit flag

2015-04-24 Thread nusenu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, what is the current policy if a single or multiple exit relays in a declared MyFamily do things that get them the badexit flag. Will other relays in that family also get that flag? One such example is the following family where 2 out of 3 got t

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread benjamin barber
I think the correlation between wanking and war is only a confounding variable to the amount of easily obtainable sexual gratification and reproductive success. That being said, I have been working on solar powered tor servers that run project maelstrom, with public tor2web instances in azure. B

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread Yasha Levine
Thanks for this explanation, Roger. I have a couple of follow-up questions: 1) How much is this DARPA contract/grant worth? 2) Did Tor developers sign NDAs or any other kind of contract that bars you from discussing certain parts of the project publicly? Thanks! YL Yasha Levine Pando.com

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread Juan
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:57:42 -0700 Yasha Levine wrote: > Thanks for this explanation, Roger. I have a couple of follow-up > questions: > > 1) How much is this DARPA contract/grant worth? > 2) Did Tor developers sign NDAs or any other kind of contract that > bars you from discussing certain part

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread goofyzrnssm
Quoting aka : if we won't be able to politicaly supress mass surveilance and atm it very much appears we won't. A little optimism, please. gz - ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the NSA's hands! $24.95 ON

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread goofyzrnssm
Roger Dingledine: And to be clear, I think this is a great trend: we need to make onion services easier to understand and more accessible (and faster and more robust) for ordinary people, or we'll remain stuck with all the metaphors that include the word 'dark'. Realizing that there are many di

Re: [tor-talk] Clarification of Tor's involvement with DARPA's Memex

2015-04-24 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On 4/25/15, goofyzrn...@vfemail.net wrote: > Roger Dingledine: >> And to be clear, I think this is a great trend: we need to make onion >> services easier to understand and more accessible (and faster and more >> robust) for ordinary people, or we'll remain stuck with all the metaphors >> that inc