> From: tor-talk-requ...@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: tor-talk Digest, Vol 55, Issue 19
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:50:31 +
>
> Send tor-talk mailing list submissions to
> tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
Thanks for the fix Alec! Though, I'd rather wait for the Onion fix, not
that in a rush :)
Thanks a lot and looking forward for the fix! Could you keep in touch?
Regards
On 08/14/2015 02:36 AM, Alec Muffett wrote:
>> On Aug 13, 2015, at 2:22 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
>> Alec, please also let me know
> On Aug 13, 2015, at 2:22 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> Alec, please also let me know if this ends up being due to either some
> feature we've patched/disabled in Tor Browser, or due to a recent
> regression in Tor Browser 5.
Hi Mike - I’m pretty sure this one’s my bad. Will let you know if otherwis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Do you have ControlPort enabled and does this log line appear when you
open an external app which uses ControlPort?
In my case, on 0.2.7.2-alpha, I see this every time I open arm. Please
confirm if this is the case, so I may open a ticket for it.
O
Alec Muffett:
>
> > On Aug 12, 2015, at 9:52 PM, Qaz wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to download my Facebook archive and hopefully I get to leave
> > Facebook forever - I did before but due to family communication as well
> > as relatives, I had to make one again. I can't download my archive since
>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Chris Dagdigian wrote:
> [warn] ConnLimit must be at least 32. Failing.
>
> .. despite setting ConnLimit to 1024 in torrc and testing the OS via "ulimit
> -H -n" I still see the "Failing" message as the last updated line in tor
What is output of 'ulimit -H -n' and
A failed UPS took down my little tor exit node running Raspbian linux on
a Rasberry Pi 2 Model B so I decided to move from -stable to the latest
-alpha
However I'm having issues getting it to operate. I keep seeing this as
the last log entry:
[warn] ConnLimit must be at least 32. Failing.
Hi Alec,
Thanks a lot! Could you send me your PGP public key?
Regards
On 08/13/2015 10:01 PM, Alec Muffett wrote:
>> On Aug 12, 2015, at 9:52 PM, Qaz wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to download my Facebook archive and hopefully I get to leave
>> Facebook forever - I did before but due to family commun
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 9:52 PM, Qaz wrote:
>
> I am trying to download my Facebook archive and hopefully I get to leave
> Facebook forever - I did before but due to family communication as well
> as relatives, I had to make one again. I can't download my archive since
> I was using Tor Browser -
Lara:
I have no idea how to do it. And I bet most of the readers of this list
don't know it either. Yet, they can be pretty useful in some cases or
downright dangerous in others. Take for example an adblocker. It can
fingerprint you, but it can save time, bandwidth, battery time. When
you
have a
I have no idea how to do it. And I bet most of the readers of this list
don't know it either. Yet, they can be pretty useful in some cases or
downright dangerous in others. Take for example an adblocker. It can
fingerprint you, but it can save time, bandwidth, battery time. When you
have a short at
Crappy design and wild adverts seem to be the norm on the Web. So
Firefox Reader comes as a pretty useful app/extension/whatever they
might call it.
But I see it is disabled in TBB5. Can anyone shed some light why?
Cheers!
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe o
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Thomas White wrote:
> Totally agree on the fact. Most of the load is also placed onto exits
I'd say that depends as some function on the ratio of number of exits
vs non-exit relays, and the destination ratio of all client traffic between
HS and clearnet. The first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Totally agree on the fact. Most of the load is also placed onto exits
and I can certainly testify no matter how much bandwidth or CPU power
I gave the tor process as an exit with quite liberal exit policies, it
really ate it up and rarely had below 90%
(Ugh -- please don't cross-post across lists. I'm going to pick the
list that had the previous thread on it.)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 03:03:10AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> Tor appears maybe operating at 50% of bandwidth capacity...
> https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth-flags.html
> https://metr
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Thomas White wrote:
> For relays, being able to make more use of available bandwidth would
> vastly increase the network speed, furthermore make home clients see
> an improvement in their daily Tor usage. It also benefits hidden
> service people as they can then ru
16 matches
Mail list logo
