Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:23:39 +0200
From: Wim Van Loock wim.van.lo...@telenet.be
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-talk] Tor browser won't become the standard one...
Message-ID: B6C5A189EAC64A0E9A7A9E4542F7A65D@Desktop
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi,
I just entered
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:23:39 +0200
From: Wim Van Loock wim.van.lo...@telenet.be
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-talk] Tor browser won't become the standard one...
Message-ID: B6C5A189EAC64A0E9A7A9E4542F7A65D@Desktop
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi,
I just entered
Tor was built for anonymous use for the World Wide Web and Clearnet websites.
However, I am wondering if there is a way we can optimize (or build from
scratch) Tor for use with Hidden Service Websites to make browsing Hidden
Services to faster and more efficient.
The Hidden Service Websites are
Hy,
i don't think letsencrypt will work on a HS because letsencrypt checks [1] if
the domain you type in, is registered.
So for example on a clearnet IP which has a registered domain at mydomain.com
called myserver.tld, letsencrypt makes a DNS check for this clearnet IP and
gets the awnser,
Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists writes:
Hello,
does anyone had looked into the upcoming Letsencrypt if it would also
works fine with Tor Hidden Services and/or if there's some
complexity/issues to be managed?
As it would/could be interesting if Tor itself would support directly
Hey Wim,
This option should exist when there are several programs that can handle a
file. Could you try this by just opening the editor and save the empty file
with the extension .html.
This behaviour is fairly strange and new to me so I will check on this tomorrow
when I have a Windows 10
elrippo writes:
Hy,
i don't think letsencrypt will work on a HS because letsencrypt checks [1] if
the domain you type in, is registered.
So for example on a clearnet IP which has a registered domain at mydomain.com
called myserver.tld, letsencrypt makes a DNS check for this clearnet IP and
Im wondering , have anyone got letsencrypt to work with a .onion site? Or is it
jus clearnet
Alec Muffett al...@fb.com skrev: (19 augusti 2015 20:43:53 CEST)
Pardon me replying to two at once...
On Aug 19, 2015, at 18:34, Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org wrote:
[...]
Right now, the
Alec Muffett writes:
Pardon me replying to two at once...
Thanks for all the helpful clarifications, Alec.
--
Seth Schoen sch...@eff.org
Senior Staff Technologist https://www.eff.org/
Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/join
815 Eddy
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Alec Muffett al...@fb.com wrote:
Hi, I'm Alec, and I am co-author of the Onion RFC draft with Jacob Appelbaum.
Reports of the bogging-down have been greatly exaggerated, and I wish people
would stop repeating them.
The status of the Onion RFC draft is
Pardon me replying to two at once...
On Aug 19, 2015, at 18:34, Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org wrote:
[...]
Right now, the industry allows .onion certs temporarily, but only EV
certs, not DV certs (the kind that Let's Encrypt is going to issue),
and the approval to issue them under the
Flipchan writes:
Im wondering , have anyone got letsencrypt to work with a .onion site? Or is
it jus clearnet
For the reasons described elsewhere in this thread, it's definitely
just clearnet for the foreseeable future.
--
Seth Schoen sch...@eff.org
Senior Staff Technologist
Hello,
does anyone had looked into the upcoming Letsencrypt if it would also
works fine with Tor Hidden Services and/or if there's some
complexity/issues to be managed?
As it would/could be interesting if Tor itself would support directly
letsencrypt to load TLS certificate on TorHS.
--
Fabio
grarpamp:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010379.html
https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commit/73c9efe74c5cc8faea9c2b2c785a2f5b68aa4c23
Bitcoin XT contains an unmentioned addition which periodically
downloads
lists of Tor IP addresses for blacklisting,
14 matches
Mail list logo
