[tor-talk] Tor 0.2.8.3-alpha is released.

2016-05-26 Thread Nick Mathewson
Tor 0.2.8.3-alpha resolves several bugs, most of them introduced over the course of the 0.2.8 development cycle. It improves the behavior of directory clients, fixes several crash bugs, fixes a gap in compiler hardening, and allows the full integration test suite to run on more platforms.

Re: [tor-talk] Adverse Affects of Using Tor > Gmail Specifically

2016-05-26 Thread Bradley Harvey
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Jan Reister wrote: > Il 26/05/2016 06:23, grarpamp ha scritto: > > Strong gmail advice... > > Make sure you write down your signup date, the addresses > > you correspond with frequently, and whatever else a > > reset asks you for... you wil need it if it locks you

[tor-talk] Audio fingerprinting

2016-05-26 Thread mrnob...@mail-on.us
http://techcrunch.com/2016/05/19/audio-fingerprinting-being-used-to-track-web-users-study-finds/ A wide-scale study of online trackers carried out by researchers at Princeton University has identified a new technique being used to try to strip web users of their privacy, as well as quantifying the

Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

2016-05-26 Thread mrnob...@mail-on.us
VFEMail login works, the problem is that their free tier mail sometimes observes massive delays in delivery. They even have a hidden service to check your mail in the browser. blo...@openmailbox.org: > Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally > anti-Tor. > > Cock.li and

[tor-talk] Audio fingerprinting

2016-05-26 Thread mrnob...@mail-on.us
http://techcrunch.com/2016/05/19/audio-fingerprinting-being-used-to-track-web-users-study-finds/ A wide-scale study of online trackers carried out by researchers at Princeton University has identified a new technique being used to try to strip web users of their privacy, as well as quantifying the

Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

2016-05-26 Thread Flipchan
I use riseup.net and can recommend that, i use to use hushmail but u know^^ blo...@openmailbox.org skrev: (25 maj 2016 21:55:15 CEST) >Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally >anti-Tor. > >Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the names >look >weir

Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

2016-05-26 Thread malte
mailbox.org is nice, accepts cash via mail, and actively supports Tor by running an exit node in their infrastructure and providing onion services. Sincerely, Malte -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.or

Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

2016-05-26 Thread Griffin Boyce
blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally anti-Tor. I've had a good experience with Autistici/Inventati -- which is a small Italian co-op similar to RiseUp. MayFirst/PeopleLink and Electric Embers are also great co-ops that are fine w

Re: [tor-talk] Adverse Affects of Using Tor > Gmail Specifically

2016-05-26 Thread Jan Reister
Il 26/05/2016 06:23, grarpamp ha scritto: > Strong gmail advice... > Make sure you write down your signup date, the addresses > you correspond with frequently, and whatever else a > reset asks you for... you wil need it if it locks you. If you enable 2 factor authentication, save your 2FA reset co