Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

Autistici got lots of domain names to Choice thats cool ng0 skrev: (27 maj 2016 14:21:35 CEST) >On 2016-05-26(04:42:20-0400), Griffin Boyce wrote: >> blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: >> > Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally >> > anti-Tor. >> >>I've

Re: [tor-talk] Audio fingerprinting

Isnt it block java? As simple as that "mrnob...@mail-on.us" skrev: (26 maj 2016 08:23:34 CEST) >http://techcrunch.com/2016/05/19/audio-fingerprinting-being-used-to-track-web-users-study-finds/ > >A wide-scale study of online trackers carried out by researchers at >Princeton

Re: [tor-talk] Audio fingerprinting

> So it’s not collecting sound played or recorded on a machine but rather > harvesting the audio signature of the individual machine and using that as an > identifier to track a web user. "Audio signature" seems a bit broad.  From what I can tell it could be doing about three things:1)

Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

grarpamp: > Yandex was very aggressive with their outbound spam > filtering, so ability to reliably send messages became > very annoying, with no way to disable / train it. > > Has yandex corrected this problem? I've never had any issues. -- kat -- tor-talk mailing list -

Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 6/3/2016 9:39 AM, Katya Titov wrote: > blo...@openmailbox.org: >> Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not >> totally anti-Tor. >> >> Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the >> names look weird to

Re: [tor-talk] Audio fingerprinting

Actually meant if some of you anon folks knew if it was possible to perform this deanonymisation without javascript. The "fuck javascript" part that i know :) juan: > On Thu, 26 May 2016 06:23:34 + > "mrnob...@mail-on.us" wrote: > > >> uses fingerprintjs2 library. >> >>

Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

blo...@openmailbox.org: > Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally > anti-Tor. > > Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the names > look weird to "normal" people. > > Ruggedinbox is unreliable as the site is often down. VFEmail used to > work but

Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

On 6/3/16, Katya Titov wrote: Yandex was very aggressive with their outbound spam filtering, so ability to reliably send messages became very annoying, with no way to disable / train it. Has yandex corrected this problem? -- tor-talk mailing list -

Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now

Or the peers could randomely drop some packets, did not think strongly about it for now, but why not Le 03/06/2016 à 11:57, Aymeric Vitte a écrit : > > > > Le 03/06/2016 à 07:43, grarpamp a écrit : >> On 6/2/16, Aymeric Vitte top posted without >> trimming: >>> Yes:

Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now

Le 03/06/2016 à 07:43, grarpamp a écrit : > On 6/2/16, Aymeric Vitte top posted without trimming: >> Yes: https://github.com/Ayms/node-Tor#convergence >> >> Let's imagine that one Tor circuit reaches a P2P network (here browsers) >> and is splitted between different

Re: [tor-talk] Tor (and other nets) probably screwed by Traffic Analysis by now

> On global backbones... > Inject / drop / delays require a complete fiber cut and > insertion of active hardware capable of selecting traffic Reminds me of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Jimmy_Carter_(SSN-23) -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change