I think its great that u can download it, and if u like it u will/can buy it :)
Conrad Rockenhaus skrev: (26 juli 2016 22:47:43
CEST)
>Just a short answer to your rant - you are correct about the embrace
>of
>mp3. Had they done it sooner, they would of banked in quite a bit of
>money.
>
>Reg
Just a short answer to your rant - you are correct about the embrace of
mp3. Had they done it sooner, they would of banked in quite a bit of
money.
Regards,
Conrad Rockenhaus
On 2016-07-25 09:44, Friet Pan wrote:
Sounds a bit like the war on drugs.
They refuse to look at the cause of the
Hi,
Nick Mathewson:
uniformly at random
What does this mean!
an adversary who had (k/N) of the network would deanonymize
F=(k/N)^2 of all circuits...
and after a given user had built C circuits, the attacker
would see them at least once with probability 1-(1-F)^C.
With large C, the attack
Hi,
Mirimir:
Why do trusting users get blamed?
Victim blaming XD
Wordlife,
Spencer
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/2016 07:31 PM, Tempest wrote:
> Jonathan Wilkes:
>> And here we have a respondent who does a complete 180 on the
>> constraints. Claiming that "mum" just needs to "invest the time"
>> is to do exactly the opposite of what Haroon was implying.
