On 11/27/2016 8:04 PM, tort...@arcor.de wrote:
You can check that from default "Use custom settings for history" to "Never remember
history". But it is not saved.
Probably because when you switch to Never remember history, that's the
same as Always use private browsing. It switches to that wor
Seth David Schoen writes:
> Notably, Google has even experimentally deployed a PQ ciphersuite
> in Chrome (that uses elliptic-curve cryptography in parallel with
> Alkim et al.'s "new hope" algorithm).
>
> https://security.googleblog.com/2016/07/experimenting-with-post-quantum.html
Coincidentall
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:44:15PM +0100, Flipchan wrote:
> I dont think so, quantum 4times at fast so we just need to generate 4times as
> strong keys the entropy will just be bigger, But as Long as we are not useing
> like 56 bit des keys its okey
No, it's way more complicated than this.
The
Flipchan writes:
> I dont think so, quantum 4times at fast so we just need to generate 4times as
> strong keys the entropy will just be bigger, But as Long as we are not useing
> like 56 bit des keys its okey
You're probably thinking of safety of symmetric encryption, where there
is a quadratic
I dont think so, quantum 4times at fast so we just need to generate 4times as
strong keys the entropy will just be bigger, But as Long as we are not useing
like 56 bit des keys its okey
hi...@safe-mail.net skrev: (27 november 2016 18:54:05 CET)
>Will Quantum computing be the end of Tor and all P
The Tor project will evolve if we put our heads together. This is not
as bad as you think.
On 11/27/2016 12:54 PM, hi...@safe-mail.net wrote:
Will Quantum computing be the end of Tor and all Privacy?
It's just a matter of time before quantum computers become a reality. And
who will have the
