On 08/22/17 16:00, Coyo Stormcaller wrote:
MTor sounds like a fascinating concept.
Yes, but something happened to it and it disappeared. Virtual
dematerialization.
Yuri
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.to
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 15:55:37 -0700
Ryan Carboni wrote:
> If mtor is implemented, I don't see any loss of security over Tor.
> Although many web applications are currently designed for unicast.
MTor sounds like a fascinating concept.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To un
Weren't people speculating that tens of thousands of tor connections were
used to deanonymize web services like Doxbin?
If mtor is implemented, I don't see any loss of security over Tor.
Although many web applications are currently designed for unicast.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.t
On 08/22/17 00:15, Jacki M wrote:
Tor version 0.2.3.25 is no longer supported and that last comment on the mtor project
was more than a year ago, Latest commit f50af12 on Aug 17, 2016, so it looks like the
project is no longer in development and the version of tor it is based on is
extremely o
Tor version 0.2.3.25 is no longer supported and that last comment on the mtor
project was more than a year ago, Latest commit f50af12 on Aug 17, 2016, so it
looks like the project is no longer in development and the version of tor it is
based on is extremely outdated, and not secure. Currently s
