You may be interested in our paper "HSTS Supports Targeted Surveillance"
that we will present at FOCI next week
https://www.usenix.org/conference/foci18/presentation/syverson
Amongst other things, it discusses some of the issues raised in this thread.
They will post the paper on Tuesday, but if
> The project called Free Haven never got finished, because of the hard
> research questions described on the front page:
> https://www.freehaven.net/
Where does (or should) the line or guidepath go on such projects
in the space between say bulletproof (for all, most, or some use cases),
and good
Have you thought about running your own email server.
-Original Message-
From: tor-talk [mailto:tor-talk-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Need
Secure Mail
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 12:28 PM
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] HSTS forbids "Add an
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 04:27:33PM +, Need Secure Mail wrote:
> On August 8, 2018 1:57 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
>
> > Right. This is the recommendation in the RFC [0]. It would be
> > counter-productive if the webserver informed the browser that the
> > website should only be loaded over a
On 8/8/2018 6:22 PM, Need Secure Mail wrote:
Grizzled long-time Tor user here. I seek basic, reliable POP/IMAP/SMTP
service with an option to use my own domain (to avoid lock-in with a
provider), from a well-established provider who will not likely disappear
*and* will never block my account for
gandi.net
https://www.reddit.com/r/emailprivacy/
https://www.reddit.com/r/onions/
deepdotweb
search: email tor onion
Etc.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
vfemail.net
Probably many others still on bitcoin.it and other wikis.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On August 8, 2018 1:57 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> Right. This is the recommendation in the RFC [0]. It would be
> counter-productive if the webserver informed the browser that the
> website should only be loaded over a secure connection, and then the
> user was given the option of ignore that.
Grizzled long-time Tor user here. I seek basic, reliable POP/IMAP/SMTP
service with an option to use my own domain (to avoid lock-in with a
provider), from a well-established provider who will not likely disappear
*and* will never block my account for Tor logins, demand selfies with
gov-id, etc. I
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 10:59:23AM +, Need Secure Mail wrote:
> On August 7, 2018 11:14 PM, nusenu wrote:
> >> did you notice the non-HSTS/HSTS distinction when trying to add an
> >> exception?
>
> On August 8, 2018 1:51 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> > If there is, would have to look closer, thx.
On August 7, 2018 11:14 PM, nusenu wrote:
>> did you notice the non-HSTS/HSTS distinction when trying to add an exception?
On August 8, 2018 1:51 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> If there is, would have to look closer, thx.
The following is to help searchers who rammed their heads into this
problem, as I
11 matches
Mail list logo
