> On Oct 23, 2018, at 2:14 PM, Nathan Freitas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, at 1:55 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Iain Learmonth wrote:
>>> It might also be that half-duplex communication (even if implemented
>>> with humans saying "over") could bri
Just saw your email and i am interested in see this!
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 2:45 PM grarpamp wrote:
> A more generalized subject for whoever,
> perhaps coming from the recent VoIP PBX threads,
> or out from onionland.
>
> There's a *lot* going on entirely within onionland that
> most don't see
A more generalized subject for whoever,
perhaps coming from the recent VoIP PBX threads,
or out from onionland.
There's a *lot* going on entirely within onionland that
most don't see because they never spend any time in it.
Same for the other popular overlay networks.
Onionland has been growing f
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, at 1:55 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Iain Learmonth wrote:
> > It might also be that half-duplex communication (even if implemented
> > with humans saying "over") could bring benefits as this would allow you
> > to increase the buffer
Connect to sip.greyponyit.com
Here’s some extensions to try out (please let me know if more are needed or if
you want your own):
15576
Secret: 75cdaec43cbd0406083fc96f0af5e633
15577
Secret: b80099db8ad73f2ae92c2b8d45e4e1c0
15578
Secret: 6217c9b653467a6130fdfff6ff569002
15579
Secret: af5715596
> On Oct 23, 2018, at 7:49 AM, Iain Learmonth wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Hi,
>
> On 23/10/18 01:27, grarpamp wrote:
>
>> Yes, one cannot rationally overload all 128 bits for that without colliding
>> upon allocated IPv6 space that may appear in one's host stack.
>> However the 1:1 key netw
Hi,
On 23/10/18 01:27, grarpamp wrote:
> Bittorrent users don't need lifetime / PQC level authentication
> between peers, they just need enough to prevent nuisance
> collisions from degrading operations. Today even the less
> than 32 bits of IPv4 (reality: users don't typically brute the ISPs)
> a
Hi,
On 23/10/18 06:55, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Reminds me of the early days in Guardian Project's voice support in Orbot,
> where they essentially built a "push to talk" feature that encoded your
> thing as an mp3 and sent it across the Tor network and played it on the
> other end. I hear that,
Hi,
On 23/10/18 13:18, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
> If it were to be offered as a non-hidden service, what about the UDP portion
> of the VoIP services, or do we just force everything to be TCP?
You still have 3-hops to the rendezvous point that are going through Tor
so it all still has to be TCP.
Iain,
If it were to be offered as a non-hidden service, what about the UDP portion of
the VoIP services, or do we just force everything to be TCP?
Thanks,
Conrad
> On Oct 22, 2018, at 11:13 AM, Iain Learmonth wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Hi Conrad,
>
> On 20/10/18 06:07, Conrad Rockenhaus w
10 matches
Mail list logo
