[tor-talk] Hidden Services using same onion address?

2011-05-05 Thread Anon Mus
Hi, What happens if 2 Tor systems supported different Hidden Services using same abc.onion address? Is this possible? 1. If not possible, will they clash or will just one be refused? 2. If is possible, could that also be used to support the same hidden service (essentially location fragmenta

Re: [tor-talk] Hidden Services using same onion address?

2011-05-05 Thread Anon Mus
Moritz Bartl wrote: Hi, On 05.05.2011 13:08, Anon Mus wrote: What happens if 2 Tor systems supported different Hidden Services using same abc.onion address? This is the hidden redundancy feature built in to Tor. The last of the systems to publish its key is the one that receives the

[tor-talk] SMTP & POP3 Email over Tor.. Anonymity breaking?

2011-06-02 Thread Anon Mus
Hi, Is it true that email SMTP & POP3 hosts (e.g. gmail's servers) can obtain from SMTP & POP3 clients (e.g. Thunderbird) data such as, 1. client time zone 2. client machine clock time 3. client machine time since last boot even though its over Tor? If so, can't these be used to trace a clie

Re: [tor-talk] SMTP & POP3 Email over Tor.. Anonymity breaking?

2011-06-02 Thread Anon Mus
t...@lists.grepular.com wrote: On 02/06/2011 11:59, Anon Mus wrote: Is it true that email SMTP & POP3 hosts (e.g. gmail's servers) can obtain from SMTP & POP3 clients (e.g. Thunderbird) data such as, 1. client time zone 2. client machine clock time 3. client machine time si

Re: [tor-talk] SMTP & POP3 Email over Tor.. Anonymity breaking?

2011-06-03 Thread Anon Mus
Great thats just what I wanted. tagnaq wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/02/2011 06:55 PM, Anon Mus wrote: Does anyone know if there is a mail client source code out there that I could modify to create a client that would send settable/random values? You

Re: [tor-talk] SMTP & POP3 Email over Tor.. Anonymity breaking?

2011-06-03 Thread Anon Mus
tagnaq wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/03/2011 03:03 PM, Anon Mus wrote: Great thats just what I wanted. Also if these few settings seam to be what you wanted, please keep in mind that they cover only the most obvious information leaks and there might be

Re: [tor-talk] US Senators Seek to Crackdown on Bitcoin

2011-06-16 Thread Anon Mus
Pad 0c wrote: - I bet on the fact that others will came after me. - I bet that bitcoin will be still used at some later point. Only the first describe a ponzi scheme and I think only the second apply for bitcoins. This is very true and is something which differentiates BitCoin from a

Re: [tor-talk] US Senators Seek to Crackdown on Bitcoin

2011-06-16 Thread Anon Mus
Eugen Leitl wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 08:47:09AM -0400, and...@torproject.org wrote: For the record, Tor has not heard from the DEA nor US Senators about Silk Road. Hopefully they'll call first instead of sending SWAT teams. Shouldn't people in Ft Meade already know where the ph

[tor-talk] Tor no longer works with win2K ??

2011-11-10 Thread Anon Mus
I got a message to upgrade my Tor version.. Nov 10 10:20:45.953 [Warning] Please upgrade! This version of Tor (0.2.1.30) is obsolete, according to the directory authorities. Recommended versions are: 0.2.1.31,0.2.2.34,0.2.3.6-alpha,0.2.3.7-alpha But (as before) the latest versions of the expe

Re: [tor-talk] Tor no longer works with win2K ??

2011-11-10 Thread Anon Mus
Jeroen Massar wrote: On 2011-11-10 11:39 , Anon Mus wrote: [..] Nov 10 10:17:10.093 [Warning] Warning from libevent: evsig_init: socketpair: Cannot assign requested address [WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL ] This is the important part, it states that the address is not available. Did your properly

Re: [tor-talk] Tor no longer works with win2K ??

2011-11-10 Thread Anon Mus
Jeroen Massar wrote: On 2011-11-10 11:39 , Anon Mus wrote: [..] Nov 10 10:17:10.093 [Warning] Warning from libevent: evsig_init: socketpair: Cannot assign requested address [WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL ] This is the important part, it states that the address is not available. Did your properly

Re: [tor-talk] Tor no longer works with win2K ??

2011-11-10 Thread Anon Mus
and...@torproject.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:39:38AM +, my.green.lant...@googlemail.com wrote 2.0K bytes in 50 lines about: : Nov 10 10:17:10.093 [Warning] Warning from libevent: evsig_init: : socketpair: Cannot assign requested address [WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL ] Do you have antivirus o

Re: [tor-talk] Tor no longer works with win2K ??

2011-11-12 Thread Anon Mus
Jacob Appelbaum wrote: On 11/10/2011 02:39 AM, Anon Mus wrote: I got a message to upgrade my Tor version.. Nov 10 10:20:45.953 [Warning] Please upgrade! This version of Tor (0.2.1.30) is obsolete, according to the directory authorities. Recommended versions are: 0.2.1.31,0.2.2.34,0.2.3.6

Re: [tor-talk] Tor no longer works with win2K ??

2011-11-13 Thread Anon Mus
On Nov 12, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Anon Mus wrote: Jacob Appelbaum wrote: On 11/10/2011 02:39 AM, Anon Mus wrote: I got a message to upgrade my Tor version.. Nov 10 10:20:45.953 [Warning] Please upgrade! This version of Tor (0.2.1.30) is obsolete, according to the directory authoriti

Re: [tor-talk] Is this a practical vulnerability?

2012-10-19 Thread Anon Mus
On 19/10/2012 04:12, Lee Whitney wrote: I was reading a paper on discovering hidden service locations, and couldn't find any reason it shouldn't work in principle. However being that I'm a Tor novice, I wanted ask here. In a nutshell they propose throwing some modified Tor nodes out there that

Re: [tor-talk] Is this a practical vulnerability?

2012-10-20 Thread Anon Mus
On 19/10/2012 13:40, Andreas Krey wrote: On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:25:34 +, Anon Mus wrote: ... Within 24hrs of making that Tor hidden service live I could see, in my firewall logs, hundreds of repeated attempts trying to hack my server, directly from the internet, not via my hidden Tot

Re: [tor-talk] Is this a practical vulnerability?

2012-10-20 Thread Anon Mus
On 19/10/2012 15:40, Lee Whitney wrote: There are actually two possible explanations for what you saw: 1) Tor was compromised If it was compromised then why would they have hacked the web server in that manner and with such inaccuracy? 2) Your IP was discovered Well, a

Re: [tor-talk] Is this a practical vulnerability?

2012-10-20 Thread Anon Mus
ould be clear I have no idea what I'm talking about. e.g. I don't know what your middleman server not getting attacked indicates. Anon Mus wrote: Within 24hrs of making that Tor hidden service live I could see, in my firewall logs, hundreds of repeated attempts trying to hack my

Re: [tor-talk] Is this a practical vulnerability?

2012-10-20 Thread Anon Mus
On 19/10/2012 16:38, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:25:34AM +0100, Anon Mus wrote: e.g. lets say a node is in a server in an IBM/US telecoms company based in France, then that server will almost certainly be routing ALL its traffic through the USA and back to itself (or another

Re: [tor-talk] Is this a practical vulnerability?

2012-10-20 Thread Anon Mus
On 20/10/2012 14:46, Andreas Krey wrote: On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:29:57 +, Anon Mus wrote: ... I had been creating/running corporate web sites since the mid 1990's, I hardly think that qualified me as a newbie. Not sure what was the purpose of this remark was. The purpose of the remar