Hi guys, I have a quick question regarding the following blog entry:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/top-changes-tor-2004-design-paper-part-2
the last part states that Bit-torrent traffic can be trivially identified
to originate at the user's ip.
As an exit node operator, I get those annoying inf
thanks everyone!
Julian Yon: perhaps they can force me to log the ip of every bit torrent
user and hand it over?
not the relay it was coming from, the original ip that used bit torrent.
adrelanos: maybe that could get me in trouble for not doing enough to help
the rights holder?
andrew: thanks,
hi, how about an IRC server running as a hidden service?
you could even use ssl with it (but since the key has to be blindly trusted
by others,
that doesn't add much over the encryption and prevention of MITM attacks
that Tor will already provide you with.)
people on the server who seek a private c
e user. :-) torchat is very simple but I wish
> it support multiple people. I will also use cryptocat but I wanted a secure
> download app.
>
> --
> Jerzy Łogiewa -- jerz...@interia.eu
>
> On Nov 16, 2012, at 1:51 AM, george torwell wrote:
>
> > hi, how about an IRC se
really want to hear about it.
thanks
On 17 November 2012 12:41, Julian Yon wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:59:55 -0500
> george torwell wrote:
>
> > i have a few unrelated questions, if i may.
> > ive noticed that you have your own mail server, which is cool.
>
> I do
true, but looking at the massive amounts of government's requests from say,
google for inbox content.
i would say that storing your own mail will help a lot.
of course, i don't know the true magnitude of interceptions, and encryption
is a must to hide content.
but it seems to me that practically, t
ill really try not to go conspiracy crazy... but that is always a risk
when discussing the NSA on this list :)
if they intercepted everything, there wont be much of a need to decrypt it.
they could watch it going in plaintext to the exit nodes, and use timing attacks and get a pretty good
sense
> >> Is there a reason 1024 bit keys, instead of something higher is not
> used?
> >> Do higher bit keys affect host performance, or network latency?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bernard
> >>
> >>
> >>
> &
an you imagine it
currently to be. To decrypt keys, It does not take what you might
otherwise expect.
>
> I'm sure one or more of the developers are either in denial or part of
the "security" apparatus or both. I would not hold your breath.
>
> Be well.
>
> On Thu,
