On Fri, 3 May 2019, at 12:27, Stirling Newberry wrote:
> ATTENTION GREYPONY USERS
So much for "I want a server that does not keep logs"
Cheers,
Lara
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torprojec
a conspiracy baby. But given that you have a "non-profit", I could bet you
will still stick around, instead of taking your toys before the tantrum is over.
Cheers,
Lara
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, at 14:01, Nathaniel Suchy wrote:
> Do we know if anyone has ever connected to the Tor Network from the
> International Space Station?
It would be quite ironic, given the latency they face in orbit.
Cheers!
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubs
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, at 16:34, Alec Muffett wrote:
> There appears to be some kind of bot which sends repeated porn/sex-related
> emails to people who post to various Tor maillists.
>
> It's a nuisance but I just mark them as spam, albeit they arrive from
> disparate email addresses.
Observations
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:59 AM Conrad Rockenhaus
wrote:
> > usage of a container (Snap or otherwise) to improve security?
>
> It takes at least double the amount of time to build a snap than it does
> to build a deb, and in the end you can get the same result.
Yes. We can all imagine the stupidi
s or preachers for the Big Government like Schneier get
nice speech fees and no pies.
Cheers,
Lara
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, at 01:50, Dave Warren wrote:
> Several Cloudflare staff members have commented [...]
So you are a few steps closer to the truth than what Tor related activity I see
online. Yes, Cloudflare is not a person. And *it* is not out to get precisely
you as *it* sees the people as c
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, at 16:01, Nathaniel Suchy wrote:
> I hate Cloudflare and what they’re doing to Tor users.
Luckily Cloudflare, Google, Facebook do not hate you or the other Tor Users.
Talking about being unfair.
> Very few of us have
> done something malicious on Tor,
Can you quote some rel
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, at 12:12, David Niklas wrote:
> grarpamp wrote:
> > One email, and ticket opened, and tweet complaint, per each
> > captcha click, from each affected tor user... that should do the
> > trick ;-)
>
> I think I'll try that.
Hence proving to the world that the Tor community is
On May 28, 2018 10:06:05 PM UTC, Kevin Burress wrote:
>Now whether or not all of this power consumption is a coverup for the
>quantum capibilities of the NSA is a matter of speculation, but the
>fact of the matter is they are breaking encryption and they did spend
>$2 billion on a datacenter for t
On Wed, 16 May 2018, at 13:19, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> Agreed. It is good to celebrate milestones to ensure we keep our
> energy and optimism up. Most of the time, however, we keep our heads
> down, and focus on quality. I have been actively maintaining Orbot for
> 9 years, so keep hope alive!
And
On Wed, 16 May 2018, at 11:53, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> Since we release Orbot roughly 8 years ago, it has been installed
> more than 20 million times, by people from hundreds of different
> countries and walks of life. Even better, we have cross the 2 million
> active user mark, with growing adopti
On Wed, 16 May 2018, at 11:31, Sydney wrote:
> >> So now everyone would be able to read all of may emails.
> > I doubt even EFF would have written such a thing.
> The EFF website still has the following, which you actively chose
> to ignore:
>
> “...and temporarily stop sending and especially readi
On Wed, 16 May 2018, at 00:37, panoramix.druida wrote:
> > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/05/attention-pgp-users-new-vulnerabilities-require-you-take-action-now
The problem with quoting links is that the source can ALWAYS change the
text to fit the latest developments. So you should link as a
ecting both sides from violence.
And government officials killing people in the hundreds for having the
wrong skin color is both "upholding the law" and "protecting the
innocent".
Cheers,
Lara
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change ot
On Sun, 14 Jan 2018, at 13:27, Beach and Yoga Lover wrote:
> SOCKS v5 host: 127.0.0.1 port: 9150
> Is this safe and reliable?
Yes, these are the default values for Tor Browser.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.tor
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, at 01:14, Duncan wrote:
> This does not seem like very constructive criticism about Tor Browser.
Actually the brat is right in his tantrum. Tor Browser should not
even exist.
But thanks to venerable gurus, like Vint Cerf, Richard Stallman, Tim
Berners Lee and other old white
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, at 23:18, debug wrote:
> These 3-4 anonymouses are attacking each other. Can't you close this
> ticket and lock already? This help nothing.
>
> I'm started to thinking Tor developers didn't care user's
> privacy at all.
Email at riseup. Tor Browser. You are just a middle class
n integrate it in our browsers and servers.
And Cloudflare is a hypocritical corporation just like any other:
"Cloudflare believes that the web is for everyone." Hence the need to
activate JavaScript for a whole site.
Cheers,
Lara
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
On Sat, 11 Nov 2017, at 16:05, se...@literati.org wrote:
> Storing your data in a third party service without end-to-end
> encryption is far worse from a privacy standpoint than not using Tor.
> I see no dichotomy here.
You are missing the point. They do not care about privacy. They care
about for
I see you are unable to notice the name of the OS - Minix, not Mimix. So
are you sure you are the right person to raise the alarm about something
as obvious as being mentioned days ago on Slashdot?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go
x9p wrote:
> Paypal (or xyz bank) and Tor (anonymizing network) in the same
> sentence.. should not be..
it's called "option", stallman jr
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
Well, the spam banner was not showing, so that is a security and
stability update.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, at 14:10, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
> The design of Tor is that you don't need to trust all the nodes. You
> just need to be sure the first one and the last in any connection
> chain aren't run by the *same* malicious actor.
You don't even have to know how to use the email, th
hould identify so the
government will know who the criminals are. And finally everyone should
be monitored by qualified agents to make sure nobody violates this
sacred right to privacy.
Once one single country starts doing that, more will follow. I am sure.
Lara
--
tor-talk mailing l
s, the word is reform. Do not be mislead by form, it is the
same concept.
The excellent part, and I am grateful to that, is that the Tor
foundation and EFF are making progress with identifying the problems and
finding solutions. It is an uphill battle which forces them to make some
compromises.
C
Oshame Bryan:
> I'm new to this stuff and I want you to enlighten me about getting
> connecting to the highest people on this internet
That is the easiest thing. Find something you are really good about it.
Become even better at it. Be recognised as one of the best in the field.
Become the best in
James Bunnell:
> grarpamp:
>
>> Fuck Google.
>>
>
> yes, agreed.
>
Smart. Open source smart. Beats giving a comparable service.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
krishna e bera:
> On 18/06/17 05:50 AM, Alec Muffett wrote:
>> In other news, the FB Onion, for some time after it launched,
>> geolocated to London. I can't imagine why.
>
> How can a .onion geolocate anywhere? Arent they supposed to be
> entirely in cyberspace and hidden?
How can a TWO digit
xxx:
> Well, my account "blocked" means that they asked me an official
> DOCUMENT! As Photoshop is a good friend, no problem, but...
That made me laugh so well. Thank you. It makes me think of the drunkard
comming come late at night and falling into a manhole on the way home.
Than his quest in the
parazyd:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Mateo Carmona wrote:
>> In regard to the great news about the release of heads OS I have two things
>> to say, first congratulations! second why the heads repository is hosted in
>> a non-free software repository (github). Is it not about Libre-privacy?
>
> I've t
irykoon:
> they conducted a 124-participant experiment
124 is pretty insignificant even by Tor userbase standards.
> and a 100
> percentages of reducing on the time to success when comparing their
> redesign of Tor Launcher with the original one.
when you reduce something with 100% that means ze
Linux is such a backwards system, yet, like firefox, it is the only
working alternative to closed systems.
I can't seem to find any decent firewall. Like http, the linux firewall
is the same concept from the age of arpanet. Do you know any working and
stable project that can be the equivalent of s
tort...@nym.hush.com:
> Thanks for the reply, Flipchan. Ok, I am no expert with this but had a
> look at lsof (mac equivalent of netstat) and it doesn't look like this
> is the problem. I'm attaching a screencap; the first test is before
> running Tor, the second is right after getting the error me
ban...@openmailbox.org:
> Besides password re-use from non-anonymous accounts (which password
> managers deal with), writing style (Anonymouth is supposed to deal with
> that - openjdk support in progress), Re-using a non-anonymous username
> by mistake is a remaining problem.
Great!
Now everybod
Ken Cline:
> Descriptions of what the links are about would be appreciated.
> Otherwise this kind of post looks awfully spammy to my eye.
You are missing the point. The guy wants to show the world he is a big
boy now. Not only he can read in English, he can identify the subject of
the given artic
Tempest:
> that rule only applies in a court of law. if you steal from me and are
> never taken to court, it's not a violation of "due process" if i call
> you a thief, nor is it defamation.
This is a good reason to hire a lawyer. Just being handy enough with
setting up a pgp key doesn't mean you
Octarina:
>
> Our Response
So this is tor-talk no more, but Appelbaum-Gossip Mailing List.
It's ugly when your supporters are mindless and spammers.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mai
Jaromil:
> To my eyes and those of many others,
So you are studdenly a whole forum.
> Tor would be much more credible if it would acknowledge and respect
> boundaries.
Are you aware that 'Tor' is not a person?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change oth
carlos...@sigaint.org:
> Reddit user babalui1 claims that Roger Dingledine is next to get fired by
> the Tor Project
Talking about click bait. A nobody quotes some other nobody that
somebody is going to do something. Couting the morons who will start
expressing sincere, yet moronic oppinions. 1...
Green Dream:
> Yeah, I've had enough as well. Please stop doing this, if we want to
> read more about this topic, it's not hard to find.
Weird. All I could find were some bitter ego trip stories who were
written by some nobodies. Nobodies about whom somebodies are not sure
they are who they claim
Cecilia Tanaka:
> You are a good person and it is the reason why - sorry! -
> sometimes, I ask for you don't be so aggressive in your messages.
> You are not an agressive person and - sorry again! - it always
> seems strange for me. :P
Probably not all, but most email clients and providers do
Cecilia Tanaka:
> Cari, I was raped twice. Different guys, different countries, several
> years between an event and other.
Guys, all of you, not just Cecilia, please let it die. It is one thing
to point the fallacies into the discourse and a totally different thing
to play this game of apparent
Christian Pietsch:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 10:46:07PM +0000, Lara wrote:
>>> https://medium.com/@nickf4rr/hi-im-nick-farr-nickf4rr-35c32f13da4d
>>>
>>> Hi. I’m Nick Farr. (@nickf4rr)
>>
>> A bunch of trolls inventing vague stories. The people who know
Not Friendly:
> Why are the people who know his being silent (or not responding to the
> discussion)? What does it imply?
Maybe he just choses smart people for friends. Maybe they are green men
helping install capitalism/comunism/whatever-ism.
I see aholes already know his childhood family life.
jacob appelbaum (ioerror) questions:
> https://medium.com/@nickf4rr/hi-im-nick-farr-nickf4rr-35c32f13da4d
>
> Hi. I’m Nick Farr. (@nickf4rr)
A bunch of trolls inventing vague stories. The people who know Jake seem
silent. Yet sock puppets seem to know a lot. They have never talked
before, only no
tor too. It is more
complex and that is usually not a good thing. And there is no -i switch
to generate a user/password pair.
What can you tell me about these two apps? Can I trust proxychains4 not
to leak data?
Cheers,
Lara
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe
Jerry Rocteur:
> I wanted to get your opinion, is ProtonMail a good solution for
> encrypted mails or should I look at alternatives.
What are your alternatives?
> I’ve searched and read quite a few articles and I understand that
Like? Give us some references? I am sure at least some would like t
Rejo Zenger:
>> The user can call the admin and ask the admin to read aloud the key
>> fingerprint.
>
> Yes, I like the idea. Still, I think this is not scalable, do you
> think?
In this case you will have to trust somebody who has already done that.
Maybe. Or probably the one you know trusts so
Rejo Zenger:
> - How can a user reliably determine some .onion address actually
>belongs to intended owner?
The user can call the admin and ask the admin to read aloud the key
fingerprint.
> - How is the provider of .onion service supposed to deal with a lost or
>compromised private key
Sorry for the old news. I found out that Mozilla announced in late
August they are going to kill XUL in favor of a Chrome-like API[1]. What
does that mean for the Tor Browser Bundle?
Cheers!
[1]
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/08/21/the-future-of-developing-firefox-add-ons/
--
tor-talk mail
protocol which will be better than late additions or protocol
extensions.
Cheers!
Lara
[1] http://jmap.io/
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
ma...@wk3.org:
> may I cease the occasion to invite everyone to Diaspora* once again?
> It's totally Tor-friendly and basically uncensorable.
I wonder at which point making the same advertisment turns into spam.
> A bunch of servers/pods (because the list https://podupti.me is behind
> CloudFlare
ma...@wk3.org:
> Maybe this is a good opportunity to invite people to Diaspora again.
> It's still not perfect, but it's running for something like 5 years now
> without major glitches and is only getting better.
Only that the interesting people are on the other side. That is the
reason why twitte
isis:
> I was contacted by some nice folks at Twitter who have worked to resolve this
> issue. The problems with Tor users being locked out of their Twittter
> accounts and asked for phone number *should* be fixed, but I wasn't given
> many details as to what the fix entails, so…
It's a lie. I ba
paul.cra...@sdf.org:
> I'd like to ask individuals to take a moment to erase the detritus of
> earlier messages before hitting "Send". Otherwise, I'm going to get
> carpel tunnel syndrome hitting "Page Down" to get to the meat in the
> message.
They simply can't. The brainpower is too low. This i
I use torsocks 2.1.0 with youtube-dl.
After the upgrade the connection keeps breaking off. Quite often the dns
resolution. And less often the connection just breaks. Everything but
TBB is unchanged.
So I have made the experiment. With TBB 4.5 everything works fine with
no error. Back to TBB 5 and
I have no idea how to do it. And I bet most of the readers of this list
don't know it either. Yet, they can be pretty useful in some cases or
downright dangerous in others. Take for example an adblocker. It can
fingerprint you, but it can save time, bandwidth, battery time. When you
have a short at
Crappy design and wild adverts seem to be the norm on the Web. So
Firefox Reader comes as a pretty useful app/extension/whatever they
might call it.
But I see it is disabled in TBB5. Can anyone shed some light why?
Cheers!
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe o
Mansour Moufid:
> Pizza is a real problem:
>
> http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hezbollah-names-cia-agents-in-lebanon/
>
> Coffee too!
Fascinating article.
A group speculates about some people. Their method might be as
rudimentary as locating a blond person in a part of the city where all
people hav
Cari Machet:
> dear lara
>
> you have a parasite ... ideology is a belief system & belief systems are
> religious
This guy:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Is quoting this guy:
>> On 7/30/15, Alexandre Guillioud wrote:
And back to t
Alexandre Guillioud:
> People which need tor for security, anonymity, can and will inform
> themselves.. If they don't, they risk exactly what they were risking
> withiut it.
But if that's so, than the sky is not falling. Won't Jeebus come on and
stain his white cloud?
I bet in the next post you'
devjimsm...@safe-mail.net:
> Many people use TOR without understanding enough about how it works.
> They trust TOR because of what they hear about it without their own
> verification. TOR is just a tool not the solution and you have to
> know how to use it correctly.
The Tor team should prepare a
Cari Machet:
> would be more effective if people were working on different projects for
> security as many as possible
I feel your pain, bro! How much time should *we* wait for them? *They*
should get to work ASAP!
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or ch
Virgil Griffith:
> But what was the Navy/military originally hoping to use Tor-related
> protocols for? It's unclear to me what their historical motivations were.
Because they are servants of a reptilian specie of aliens, they are
following their masters' plan. They need to spy on *you*. Because *
Mansour Moufid:
> Is bad traffic overrepresented or is good traffic underrepresented?
Mansour, the above is an useless proposition. Meaning "Is it A or is it A?"
> Bad actors are bound to be early adopters of any technology. As the
> network becomes mainstream, its content will reflect the users
Apple Apple:
> I'm sorry I don't understand what you are trying to say. The Tor project
> does not have any political motivations or affiliations. You are free to
> use the Tor network to pursue any goal and subvert any government you wish,
> including the United States.
You simply don't understan
After rereading the answer I realize it might sound sarcastic. It's not
Drew Fustini:
> Quite interesting. After reading the replies in this thread, I now
> agree that the true definition of amoral is a good description of Tor.
Reading philosophy, even introductory works, can make wonders in the
Yuri:
> On 07/12/2015 12:27, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
>> If you convert it to a safer format
>
> It is nothing inherently unsafe in pdf format itself, and any other
> document formats aren't any safer. You probably confuse pdf and
> PostScript, which is more like a programming language. PDF isn
Drew Fustini:
> I don't believe that the majority of Tor traffic is "amoral", but I
> would like to find data to support my belief. Anyone know of such
> research or statistics?
A friend... lame. But few have already bitten the bait.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To u
Henrik Lund Kramshøj:
> First, a society with NO CRIME would be a terrible idea. Since this
> would require 1984 to be fully implemented, and such a dystopian
> society would consist of slaves.
It's funny how people reference books without even bothering to read. In
1984 crime is rampant. Not only
Paul A. Crable:
> I have just finished Macdonald's "Future Crime", a recent book listing the
> ways in which we are all abused and insulted, and will be further abused
Not *we*. You. You felt somewhat like that. And you badly need to start
a revolt. Most probably your name was not even mentioned i
Vincent Schouten [info]:
> I guess it worked because after I started TBB (by clicking the desktop
> application "start-tor-browser.desktop") and then Thunderbird+Birdy, my
> mails were sent in plain txt and no errors were raised. However, how can
> I validate that the emails were actually sent over
Thomas White:
> And there is some references to DARPA collaborating with some
> developers from Tor Project. I'd like to ask the developers of Tor to
> clarify what this involvement entails and why effort is being put
> towards a LE tool instead of working on hiding Tor users through
> improving an
soc...@sponsor-privacy.com:
> On 2015-04-17 09:19, Gareth Llewellyn wrote:
>> *Questions:*
>> Will you be open sourcing any of your automation tools?
>
> I have thought about this as it might allow others to spin up a similar
> site. The issue right now is a lot of the
I would stay clear from suc
Rishab Nithyanand:
> I can't replicate all client and browser configurations, exit relays before
> posting a link to the most popular paper repository around. Sorry.
You are obviously unable to edit the reply either. Excellent references.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Rishab Nithyanand:
> Hey all,
>
> I just thought I'd share and get feedback about some recent work from our
> team at Stony Brook University.
>
> Title: Games Without Frontiers: Investigating Video Games as a Covert
> Channel [ http://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.05904v1.pdf ]
I say maybe, just maybe, it
Libertas:
> I think that "legitimate" can probably be defined as "containing some
> technical understanding and rigor, and not apparently a product of
> paranoid schizophrenia or a related disorder".
Meaning... meaningless.
> I'm not sure that we should block anything,
"We"? Who gives you the ab
nasuno:
> A good rough draft if you are serious.
A short version of that text would be "Hello god! It's me [author]". One
might think people have made a few steps forward since Moses went up the
mountain. Some shit in heated rooms built only for taking a dump. But
the mind seems blocked in the sam
Yuri:
> Who/how will decide what resources will such comments be attached to?
> Where are they stored? You mention "relay" and "tor app". But there is
> no such thing as "tor app". Do you mean having something like
> distributed hash? Who will own such data? What is the way to ensure they
> don't d
Goltz, Jim (NIH/CIT) [E]:
> If a list stops fulfilling these criteria, people like us
> unsubscribe, leaving the list to its inevitable decline, destined to
> join the ever-lengthening roll of moribund, flame-filled lists that
> no longer exist or have ceased to serve any useful function on the
> n
Have you used Bitmask over Tor?
Have you written about your experience?
Do share.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
mick:
> Now can we all stop rising to troll bait?
So you use your perceived authority of an upset citizen to mask your
incapacity to use filters?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
Ben Tasker:
>> Another example of hypocrisy is America. There's no government
>> established killing camp system but at least 50 million have been
>> murdered since 1972/73 through abortion. In all of the former examples
>> it was deemed that there is a life not worth living and they aren't
>> real
Ben Tasker:
> Because in the absence of evidence, it is just that - a conspiracy
> theory. You're asserting that Fox and the Govt (or at least some of
> it's agencies) are conspiring, but have provided no real no evidence
> to support it, hence theory.
Please do pay attention to the terms you ar
z9wahqvh:
> if the corrupt Gestapo government is so opposed to Tor, why do it and its
> subsidiary agencies provide (and have provided for all of its history)
> between 50 and 80% of the project's entire funding, a pattern which
> continues to this day?
Dude, this is a conspiracy. It does not need
Travis Bean:
> I am giving everyone on this mailing list a heads-up regarding what I
> have uncovered about the Gestapo government here in the United States
> and why corrupt government officials are so strongly opposed to this Tor
> project.
You have no idea what Gestapo was troll.
> I can prove
intrigeri:
> Tor can transport basically anything that lives on top of TCP.
> Assuming HTTP/2 is TCP, then there's basically nothing to do on the
> Tor side, it should just work :)
Right. But see the WebRTC issues, does Tor browser team know of problems
with this new HTTP flavor?
--
tor-talk mai
What is the stand of the Tor Project related to HTTP/2?
Thank you
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
grarpamp:
> The NRA is 3.5M - 5.0M members strong. They turn $250M/yr from that
> base (manufacturers too). They have little difference of opinion
> in their ranks. They are good at crafting and pitching political
> rhetoric, framing the conversation, and rendering complex issues
> into simple form
atoru...@mail2tor.com:
> I am a loyal user of the Internet Time Warner Cable and I forgot to pay my
> bill. Keep in mind that I've had Time Warner Cable for almost a year now
> and I've never forgot to pay my bill.
It is a terrible thing. You should protest. I mean the Internet started
in late 201
Mirimir:
> "They trust me — dumb fucks."[0]
>
> [0]
> http://gawker.com/5636765/facebook-ceo-admits-to-calling-users-dumb-fucks
Are you sure they have a monopoly on dumb fucks?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.t
grarpamp:
>> So Facebook is not that evil after all.
>
> But on balance, merely a political photo op.
I forgot The Church of Scare has deemed Facebook the work of the Devil.
My bad for the blasphemy.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other setting
when2plus2...@riseup.net:
> In addition, Facebook and the online payment processor Stripe each
> pledged to donate $50,000 a year to Koch’s project.
So Facebook is not that evil after all.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https
I have a OpenWRT router. And I can install tor on that. I would like to
have a middle relay. Can I hook up my TBB (computer linked over wifi) to
that tor session? Is it a bad idea? It would be on the same subnetwork.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
I have checked the net high and low. And the talk is mostly about where
you find the smiley icon to put on the bar.
How does it work? How does it respect privacy? Do you know anything
about this new thing?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other set
96 matches
Mail list logo