Re: [tor-talk] Tor source code

2017-06-08 Thread Sebastian Niehaus
Am 08.06.2017 um 21:16 schrieb Suhaib Mbarak: > Dear all. > > My question is to make sure wether tor source code is open and available > for public or not? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=tor+project+source+code > In case it is open source and can be modified how it is secure? Non sequitor -- tor-t

Re: [tor-talk] [off-topic] linux firewall

2016-12-23 Thread Sebastian Niehaus
[off topic, please not on this list] 2016-12-23 14:04 GMT+01:00 Lara : > Linux is such a backwards system > > I can't seem to find any decent firewall. Like http, the linux firewall > is the same concept from the age of arpanet. Do you know any working and > stable project that can be the equi

Re: [tor-talk] tor-talk disabling my menbership due to bounces???

2016-07-25 Thread Sebastian Niehaus
Am 25.07.2016 um 16:54 schrieb Friet Pan: > Paranoia kick in... please forgive me THEY want to keep any information about tor away from YOU! > is the mailing list provider also a dmarc.org cartel member?? dmarc.org is about how to deanonymize YOU and all the other brave tor users. THEY w

Re: [tor-talk] Invalid consensus today

2016-03-19 Thread Sebastian Niehaus
Am 18.03.2016 um 16:59 schrieb Sebastian Hahn: > Thus, any Tor not configured to trust > dannenberg's new key would've rejected the consensus as signed by > just 4 directory authorities. Thank you very much for the explanation. Would you recommend to manually configure dannenberg's new key (and w

Re: [tor-talk] Directory problems?

2016-03-19 Thread Sebastian Niehaus
Am 18.03.2016 um 14:11 schrieb tor_t...@arcor.de: > then start connect to tor. Also you can open AdvOR.ini and this to [torrc] > section. If there are problems with multiple authorities there might be something strange going on. Am am not sure if I can take my tin foil hat off or if "someone" t

[tor-talk] Consensus not signed by sufficient number of requested authorities

2016-03-18 Thread Sebastian Niehaus
Today, i recieved some strange error on my tor middle relay/guard server: (time in CET). I am runnung tor 0.2.5.12 on Debian Linux (Jessie) https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/7A32C9519D80CA458FC8B034A28F5F6815649A98 Any Ideas what might be happening? Any similar observations? Mar 18 08:19:

Re: [tor-talk] firewall

2016-02-14 Thread Sebastian Niehaus
Just set up your filters. Bypassing will not be possible. For sure! 2016-02-14 7:49 GMT+01:00 Игорь Дворянцев : > hello, gays. we in the Russian government wants to control the Internet , > as in China. is there a way to bypass the blocking and censorship ? Thank > you > -- > tor-talk mailing list

Re: [tor-talk] Opening guard relay to datacenter private network

2016-02-06 Thread Sebastian Niehaus
Am 06.02.2016 um 04:00 schrieb Gary H: > Would such a setup compromise anonymity in a way I haven't thought of? If you run a hidden service and realy want to stay hidden it is a bad relay to run it on a guard (or relay). -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscrib

Re: [tor-talk] Which webmail providers are Tor friendly.

2016-02-05 Thread Sebastian Niehaus
Try http://mailbox.org. They have an exit node, too. They acccept bitcoin. 2016-02-05 13:09 GMT+01:00 : > Hello! > > I am looking for Tor friendly webmail operators. By this, I mean ones that > do not insist on SMS verification and do not block Tor. > > I used to be happy with openmailbox.org but