On 2015-01-16 03:36, evervigil...@riseup.net wrote:
>Have you thought of using diaspora and combining it with the likes of the tor
>>network to make it a fully decentralized hidden social networking service?
No I don't have such a misleading thought because Diaspora is a
webscript and their
>although by the forward secret nature of Tor it isn't even a very worthwhile
>>exercise even if decryption were feasible
If attackers break ciphers one decade later then Tor's forward secrecy
is compromised even for any collected forward secure operation today.
>I like that you are using "o
>Hey wait, now you are saying something that doesn't fit what you said
>before.
oh I meant we won't use multicasting above hidden services so thats why
it become very expensive. If we do so then yes it become as efficient as
using PseudonymousServer
>Also, I am not so sure running the Pseudon
>I may not be lightning fast at understanding your masterplan. That last
>sentence says a lot. So you avoid doing the fan out from the original
>source but rather employ the relay network by making the third circuit hops
>take care of distribution. By "TCP packets" you mean packets on the alread
>It may be the language, but I feel you are talking about completely
>different things than the ones I pointed out. Feel free to throw all
>your estimates at me, but it doesn't make me think you solved the
>systemic problem of addressing an exponential challenge with a linear
>solution. You summ
>No, I am just suggesting not to use Tor for something it wasn't built
>for. We have been working on a technology that combines anonymization
>with multicast distribution and is therefore a lot better suited for
>social use cases. I hoped you would see this point and maybe consider
>joining forc
>So let's assume less than 1% of Facebook users use this.. let's take
>a million for example. Hundreds of thousands of Tor users would then
>be keeping hundreds of circuits open while they are interacting with
>the Bulk data servers. What do Tor backend experts think of this
>scenario?
I think
>Most transactions on a social network are one-to-many
>distributed messages.. your model provides postings
>and comments to postings, both requiring "hundreds" of
>circuits to hidden services being established or
>maintained each time something happens on one person's
>timeline. In your exampl
Hi all. we published documentations about our big plan here
sharebook.com/design.html
Wanna make sure everything is alright before starting implementing the
thing. Tell us your comments :)
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
