Since the last version and continuing with the current version of Linux TBB
32bit, there is an
extra line added to torrc on TBB reload, by Vidalia, with steps to reproduce:
* Directory:
~/tor-browser_en-US/Data/Tor
* Extra Line of Data Added:
ControlPortWriteToFile /home/madeinchina/tor-browser_
This is a followup post on this issue which persists in Linux TBB 32bit,
version 2.2.37-2.
Any idea for the cause?
What occurs when it doesn't list the library loading (is the library loading?)
and why it's listed
only on a TBB reload?
Below is a copy/paste from my original post as a refresher
Lively blog[1], a free blogging service, offers a special configuration[2] for
Tor users. It's the
first free blogging service on the open web I've discovered which encourages
Tor users to join and
blog anonymously. (unlike the .onion sites which require Tor in order to access
and usually
experi
The blog: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-18
states:
New Tor Browser Bundles
The Tor Browser Bundles and other packages have all been updated to the latest
Tor 0.2.2.36 stable
version.
https://www.torproject.org/download
Tor Browser Bundle (2.2.36-1)
Update Tor to 0.2
__
_||_
\ /
\/
,--,
:Example A : Loaded via start-tor-browser script without any changes, fresh
install of current TBB:
'--'
Tor v0.2.2.35 (git-[snip]). This is experimental software. Do not rely on it
for strong anonymity.
(Running on Linux i686)
Initialized libevent version 2
"Update OpenSSL to 1.0.1c"
If OpenSSL was updated why does my Tor Browser Bundle (2.2.35-12) for
Linux 32bit show: libssl.so.1.0.0 in the ~/tor-browser_en-US/Lib
directory?
md5sum:
d774c0f5ea0762271a814fecdf921c97 libssl.so.1.0.0
+Torbutton/Scroogle:
Scroogle is dead. It should be removed fro
With this blog entry:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-security-release
It claims 2.2.35-11 fixes a problem posted here:
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/firefox-security-bug-proxy-bypass-current-tbbs
With Tor Browser Bundle (2.2.35-11); suite=linux installed, I read whe
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-16
On March 18th, 2012 Anonymous said:
"There is an EVIL bug in at least the Linux start-tor-browser script. See
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5417
A simple error with a simple fix.
It will log things like domain names t
This is a repost of important question NOT solved within the last two months.
This is my second attempt today to send this message. Is it being deleted
by moderation because TBB may be a method of eliminating Tor use outside
of the browser and (maybe, IMO) the developers (may) wish to keep (a
larg
Who is 93.114.40.75?
The Tor check page lists it and says I'm not using Tor. Another user
reported this, too.
I loaded the Tor check page today and it said I wasn't using Tor. The IP
listed was: 93.114.40.75. I checked blutmagie's site and it said I wasn't
using Tor, with the same IP address list
Tales from the DNSCrypt: Linux Rising
# News & Notes from the OpenDNS team
# by David Ulevitch, Founder/CEO on Feb 16th, 2012
When we released the Mac-only preview of DNSCrypt, we knew it was a game
changer. The revolutionary piece of lightweight software encrypts all DNS
traffic between you and
This is a repost of important question NOT solved last month.
Please solve!
This page:
Torifying software HOWTO:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorifyHOWTO
is now, for most people using the Tor Browser Bundle, obsolete.
We who use the TBB do not have torify, usewithtor, tor-
I located some hidden files in the extracted tbb/linux, current version,
directories, are these common files or rogue and what generates these
files?
Within the Lib directory:
size / name / sha1sum
1264 .shared-library-name-list
d43f3c1d4d213f8a911d3eb8725182d0f3dc61f0
808 .shared-library-ren
13 matches
Mail list logo
