Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 14:40:11 +0100
> From: a.k...@gmx.de
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] !!! Important please read. !!!
>
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:17:47 +, Mark McCarron wrote:
> ...
> > > > In fac
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:40:11PM +0100, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:17:47 +, Mark McCarron wrote:
> ...
>
> > No, its not. Traffic obfuscation techniques can eliminate the
> > global view. It just needs to be implemented correctly.
>
> How? A user can only interact with a
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:17:47 +, Mark McCarron wrote:
...
> > > In fact, the EU mandates that this data be held for 2 years:
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_data_retention#European_Union
> >
> > No, it doesn't. The requirement is for access ISPs to log the association
> >
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:22:27 +0100
> From: a.k...@gmx.de
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] !!! Important please read. !!!
>
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:25:02 +, Mark McCarron wrote:
> ...
> > In regards to ide
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:25:02 +, Mark McCarron wrote:
...
> In regards to identifying Tor users, this is more simple than anyone imagines.
No, it isn't.
> A simple DB at an ISP recording IP addresses of those connecting to Tor nodes
> is all it takes.
Not all tor nodes are publicly known.
>
present and
provides no anonymity as it fails to deal with traffic analysis.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:23:08 -0800
> From: sch...@eff.org
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] !!! Important please read. !!!
>
> TheMindwareGroup writ
On 1/8/14 1:44 AM, TheMindwareGroup wrote:
https://wiki.thc.org/ssl
Thank you for linking that resource. It explains the issue really well.
I don't think the issue they are describing matches your doom scenario
though.
Yes, the CA system sucks horribly. It is best to assume that many of the
TheMindwareGroup writes:
> I don't know the exact details of how SSL/certificates work and I
> don't know about anyone else's opinion on this subject, this is mine
> and it doesnt look good. If this document is true, it means that due
> to a (massive) weakness in the way central certificate author
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi im Shadowman, I havent posted on here before, I found this document
and thought it rather important for everyone to read it.
https://wiki.thc.org/ssl
I don't know the exact details of how SSL/certificates work and I
don't know about anyone else'
