On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Katya Titov wrote:
> There are still many places, including some western first-world
> democracies, where Internet access is billed by the byte/KB/MB/GB. I
> live in a G20 country outside the US and pay for traffic usage. And
> anyone using a mobile connection (may
grarpamp:
> Internet access is generally provisioned and billed as... choose
> the max bandwidth you want, pay for it whether you use it or not.
> Therefore if you have idle capacity within your max at some moment,
> you have the bandwidth to dynamically fill it with padding at no
> additional cost
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
wrote:
> Fill is very expensive at the network layer but (almost) trivially cheap at
> the link layer. The cost comes in having to think about how much data is
> disclosed in the link layer framing. This is not necessarily a performance
> issue
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Ryan Carboni wrote:
>>
>> That's only if you choose to attempt a padding-across-the-net
>> management scope, which is also going to be hard and slow to
>> manage and respond to bandwidth and other net dynamics.
>> (Though this was about GPA, it's probably also vuln
>
> That's only if you choose to attempt a padding-across-the-net
> management scope, which is also going to be hard and slow to
> manage and respond to bandwidth and other net dynamics.
> (Though this was about GPA, it's probably also vulnerable to
> endpoint interruption attacks that monitor your
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Ryan Carboni wrote:
> In order to have a proper padding system, a lot more information needs to
> be leaked about current bandwidth demand.
That's only if you choose to attempt a padding-across-the-net
management scope, which is also going to be hard and slow to
m
To my knowledge, traffic is randomly assigned by clients based on consensus
percentages.
In order to have a proper padding system, a lot more information needs to
be leaked about current bandwidth demand.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other sett
On 5/29/15, grarpamp wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 5/28/15, grarpamp wrote:
>>> to be taken other than filling your unused capacity with fill traffic.
>>> No network to date appears to be developing or using that defense.
>>
>> I thought that was the main
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 5/28/15, grarpamp wrote:
>> to be taken other than filling your unused capacity with fill traffic.
>> No network to date appears to be developing or using that defense.
>
> I thought that was the main differentiator for I2P (as compared
On 5/28/15, grarpamp wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
> wrote:
>> Tor certainly works for some of its intended uses. If you are in a
>> repressive state and want to get access to CNN or the like, Tor is your
>> friend. It isn't going to prevent a police state notici
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
wrote:
> Tor certainly works for some of its intended uses. If you are in a
> repressive state and want to get access to CNN or the like, Tor is your
> friend. It isn't going to prevent a police state noticing that you might be
> up to some so
11 matches
Mail list logo
