On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Katya Titov katti...@yandex.com wrote:
There are still many places, including some western first-world
democracies, where Internet access is billed by the byte/KB/MB/GB. I
live in a G20 country outside the US and pay for traffic usage. And
anyone using a mobile
grarpamp:
Internet access is generally provisioned and billed as... choose
the max bandwidth you want, pay for it whether you use it or not.
Therefore if you have idle capacity within your max at some moment,
you have the bandwidth to dynamically fill it with padding at no
additional cost.
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Ryan Carboni rya...@gmail.com wrote:
That's only if you choose to attempt a padding-across-the-net
management scope, which is also going to be hard and slow to
manage and respond to bandwidth and other net dynamics.
(Though this was about GPA, it's probably
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
ph...@hallambaker.com wrote:
Fill is very expensive at the network layer but (almost) trivially cheap at
the link layer. The cost comes in having to think about how much data is
disclosed in the link layer framing. This is not necessarily a
That's only if you choose to attempt a padding-across-the-net
management scope, which is also going to be hard and slow to
manage and respond to bandwidth and other net dynamics.
(Though this was about GPA, it's probably also vulnerable to
endpoint interruption attacks that monitor your
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Ryan Carboni rya...@gmail.com wrote:
In order to have a proper padding system, a lot more information needs to
be leaked about current bandwidth demand.
That's only if you choose to attempt a padding-across-the-net
management scope, which is also going to be
To my knowledge, traffic is randomly assigned by clients based on consensus
percentages.
In order to have a proper padding system, a lot more information needs to
be leaked about current bandwidth demand.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other
On 5/29/15, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
On 5/28/15, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
to be taken other than filling your unused capacity with fill traffic.
No network to date appears to be developing or using
On 5/28/15, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
ph...@hallambaker.com wrote:
Tor certainly works for some of its intended uses. If you are in a
repressive state and want to get access to CNN or the like, Tor is your
friend. It isn't going
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
On 5/28/15, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
to be taken other than filling your unused capacity with fill traffic.
No network to date appears to be developing or using that defense.
I thought that was the main
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
ph...@hallambaker.com wrote:
Tor certainly works for some of its intended uses. If you are in a
repressive state and want to get access to CNN or the like, Tor is your
friend. It isn't going to prevent a police state noticing that you might
11 matches
Mail list logo
