Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

2016-02-21 Thread coderman
On 2/22/16, Green Dream wrote: >... > Interesting. Any idea what they're able to enumerate with the modified > version of Tor? they're able to enumerate the onions which land on their node(s) per O(1) mapping in HSDir participants. e.g. "get lucky" > Can the Tor network be hardened from this c

Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

2016-02-21 Thread Green Dream
> > > Another service is http://tor.luakt.net , which managed to find my > > otherwise unpublished (dummy) onion site after 1 to 2 weeks. It does > listen > > on port 80 though. > > LuaKT very likely runs a modified version of tor with additional logging > [1]. Until recently, the code was hosted o

Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

2016-02-21 Thread nusenu
René Ladan: > Op 21 feb. 2016 1:39 a.m. schreef "Roger Dingledine" : >> >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:28:37AM -0600, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote: >>> With the large sudden spike in hidden services addresses, any way to >>> view what the newly registered .onion addresses are or at least a >>> lis

Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

2016-02-20 Thread René Ladan
Op 21 feb. 2016 1:39 a.m. schreef "Roger Dingledine" : > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:28:37AM -0600, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote: > > With the large sudden spike in hidden services addresses, any way to > > view what the newly registered .onion addresses are or at least a > > list of hidden servic

Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

2016-02-20 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:28:37AM -0600, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote: > With the large sudden spike in hidden services addresses, any way to > view what the newly registered .onion addresses are or at least a > list of hidden services during the suspected time frame? No, there is no easy way to

Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

2016-02-20 Thread Mirimir
On 02/20/2016 05:43 AM, Scfith Rise up wrote: > That site doesn't have the 2+ increased sites count in its list (I've > been checking it daily). > >> On Feb 20, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Mirimir wrote: >> >>> On 02/20/2016 01:28 AM, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote: >>> With the large sudden spike in h

Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

2016-02-20 Thread Scfith Rise up
That site doesn't have the 2+ increased sites count in its list (I've been checking it daily). > On Feb 20, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Mirimir wrote: > >> On 02/20/2016 01:28 AM, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote: >> With the large sudden spike in hidden services addresses, any way to >> view what the n

Re: [tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

2016-02-20 Thread Mirimir
On 02/20/2016 01:28 AM, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote: > With the large sudden spike in hidden services addresses, any way to > view what the newly registered .onion addresses are or at least a list > of hidden services during the suspected time frame? > > If so I would love a copy of the list so I

[tor-talk] Large spike in .onion addresses - port scan?

2016-02-20 Thread CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA
With the large sudden spike in hidden services addresses, any way to view what the newly registered .onion addresses are or at least a list of hidden services during the suspected time frame? If so I would love a copy of the list so I can do a fingerprinting and port scan on the .onion address