Re: [tor-talk] Adobe Flash

2012-05-19 Thread Mike Perry
Thus spake Joe Btfsplk (joebtfs...@gmx.com): > Did the world really need another browser? No - now Google can > gather data to their heart's content. And people are flocking to > it. No, they did it to shape web standards and to set an example for web client engineering, because no one else was

Re: [tor-talk] Adobe Flash

2012-05-19 Thread Joe Btfsplk
On 5/19/2012 5:51 PM, Mike Perry wrote: Admittedly, we're in a similar position with Mozilla (which is one of the reasons I prefer them over Google for a fork base). You're not serious, that anyone would ever consider Chrome for one second, to adapt for any project that had privacy (or anonymit

Re: [tor-talk] Adobe Flash

2012-05-19 Thread Mike Perry
Thus spake krishna e bera (k...@cyblings.on.ca): > > > If you can't get Flash to use a settings file - for now - maybe next > > > best thing is education. I'm thinking there should be a prominent > > > file in TBB, containing a number of IMPORTANT changes that users > > > should make; name it som

Re: [tor-talk] Adobe Flash

2012-05-19 Thread krishna e bera
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 03:00:19PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote: > Thus spake Joe Btfsplk (joebtfs...@gmx.com): > > > Re: Flash LSO cookies in Windows. The Dec 28, 2011 design document > > mentions, > > >Flash cookies... > > > > >*...Implementation Status:* We are currently having difficulties > > ><