Thus spake Nick Mathewson (ni...@alum.mit.edu):
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:20 PM, pro...@secure-mail.biz wrote:
(Note that usernames and/or passwords can be used to separate
streams, too.)
Is this documented somewhere?
If you're asking this question, you *really* want to check out all
Does this ask for using a pre existing load balancer solution?
Can the host's firewall be configured to fan out (say round robin
or flow based) the streams (and dns) that it would normally capture
and send to a single TransPort and DNSPort... across multiple Tor's
providing same access ports?
I
The users awareness for identity correlation through circuit sharing [0] is
almost zero. There should be more clear warnings about it on torproject.org.
People are frequently told to extensively use Google. They do so and will be
affected. If you google the term [1] you will see that it has
On 2012-03-05, pro...@secure-mail.biz pro...@secure-mail.biz wrote:
The users awareness for identity correlation through circuit sharing [0] is
almost zero. There should be more clear warnings about it on torproject.org.
People are frequently told to extensively use Google. They do so and will
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:20 PM, pro...@secure-mail.biz wrote:
Thanks for your answer. It's immensely helpful.
[...]
(Note
that usernames and/or passwords can be used to separate streams,
too.)
Is this documented somewhere?
If you're asking this question, you *really* want to check out
Robert Ransom wrote:
Using multiple SocksPorts from the same Tor client only helps if you
are using Tor 0.2.3.x-alpha, which introduced 'stream isolation'. (I
don't think 0.2.2.x supports multiple SocksPorts at all.) Read the
man page.
Multiple socks ports are in stable, we'll make the
