Re: [tor-talk] Convergence.io + Tor

2011-10-13 Thread Jan Reister
Il 12/10/2011 19:21, Roc Admin ha scritto: My thought is that if implemented correctly (which it's currently not), You mean it's flawed server-side, or it's just not widely used client-side? Secondly, hosting notaries as hidden services may be a good way to implement this on the Tor network.

Re: [tor-talk] Convergence.io + Tor

2011-10-13 Thread Mike Perry
This was discussed before, though in a random thread. See: http://archives.seul.org/tor/talk/Sep-2011/msg00088.html Thus spake Roc Admin (onionrou...@gmail.com): bump On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Roc Admin onionrou...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, it's been a while so I'm sorry if this has

Re: [tor-talk] Convergence.io + Tor

2011-10-12 Thread Roc Admin
bump On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Roc Admin onionrou...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, it's been a while so I'm sorry if this has already been discussed. Hadn't seen it in the archives I wanted to bring up the subject of Convergence.io as it fits in with Tor. Details here: http://convergence.io/

[tor-talk] Convergence.io + Tor

2011-10-11 Thread Roc Admin
Hey, it's been a while so I'm sorry if this has already been discussed. Hadn't seen it in the archives I wanted to bring up the subject of Convergence.io as it fits in with Tor. Details here: http://convergence.io/ The short version of it is that it's a replacement to the current CA system.