Hello all,
> I would like to propose the topic of introducing a certain degree of
> verification, in order to obtain certain responsibilities:
On the contrary, I think that this feature could be dangerous.
For some of the adversaries Tor has, it would be actually very simple to
falsify var
Brought up adding these human factors to relays
and user programmatic selection of various class of
relay, torizen provided classes, etc many times over
years in web of trust posts. It never seems to go anywhere.
Maybe people are more afraid of relays now.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists
I think it could be a good topic for face-to-face discussion.
I also think it dovetails with our trust-aware approach. I'm
not sure I think ID in the usual official sense will mean much
in this context (but we can discuss); however, if a useful notion
of identity can be introduced it could be one o
Hi Fabio,
You continue to bring in interesting controversial ideas and I love you
for that! [but not only that :D] My thoughts about it are too complex to
express here now with the little time I currently have. We should make
this a topic for the developer meeting.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.to
Hello,
i've been considering that in the Tor network, end-users deserve the
"anonymity by design", but that's not a requirement for Tor Relay operators.
So, assuming that any Tor Relay that does bad-things is anonymous
(providing un-traceable or difficult-to-be-traced identifiable
information), w
