Hi tor-talk,
In response to the "Massive Automated Tor Bridge Requests: Why?" message
on Cryptome [1] wrote the following on my blog [2]. I'd love to hear you
take on the likeliness that Dutch police activities caused (or didn't)
the spike Roger observed [3]. I apologize for not replying in-thread
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:03:35PM +0200, k...@uva.nl wrote 7.4K bytes in 147
lines about:
: Requests: Why? [1] from the Tor-talk mailinglist. Some believe (credits
: to @ly_gs for enlightening me) that the August 2011 spike in Tor users
: via bridges may be related to the Dutch police investigati
Hi Andrew,
> : Requests: Why? [1] from the Tor-talk mailinglist. Some believe (credits
> : to @ly_gs for enlightening me) that the August 2011 spike in Tor users
> : via bridges may be related to the Dutch police investigation on Tor
> : hidden services hosting child pornography, which also took p
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 08:20:39AM +0200, Matthijs R. Koot wrote:
> > : Requests: Why? [1] from the Tor-talk mailinglist. Some believe (credits
> > : to @ly_gs for enlightening me) that the August 2011 spike in Tor users
> > : via bridges may be related to the Dutch police investigation on Tor
> >
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 08:20:39AM +0200, k...@uva.nl wrote 1.8K bytes in 40
lines about:
: I know, mind the last part (see below) of my post, which was probably
: WAY too long. I'm wondering whether, in lack of a better explanation,
: the bridge spike might have been caused by undisclosed activit
- Original Message -
> From: "and...@torproject.org"
> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 2:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Dutch Police Investigation & Tor Spike: Correlation
> Or Also Causation?
>
> The current rumors around this spike in bridge queri
