On 2/2/16 1:50 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 03:42:51PM +0100, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists
> wrote:
>> But 90% of my resources (given the previous hypotetical assumption)
>> would be happily pumping non-abuse-generating Tor exit traffic.
>>
>> Does anyone ever done s
On 2/2/16 1:50 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> My suggestion to him at the time was to write up the details for why his
> design is safe, and get them vetted by other researchers in public, before
> proceeding. I haven't talked to him about how it's going since then.
> Hopefully he didn't skip too
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 03:42:51PM +0100, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists
wrote:
> But 90% of my resources (given the previous hypotetical assumption)
> would be happily pumping non-abuse-generating Tor exit traffic.
>
> Does anyone ever done some kind of testing or analysis about that kind
> of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
A NAS works at home very well, but if you need access from abroad you would
need to connect it to your router with a domain.
Personally I prefer the mentioned solution, but to blame TOR for the lock out
forced by ransomware on your desktop leads m
Hi,
Elrippo:
a cloud under your own control
A hard drive with Wi-Fi works wonders.
instead of blaming
It would be interesting to see what they see, so as to understand the
source of such confusion. Blame may be accurately placed if Tor is
being framed, even if indirectly through con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Well, using Dropbox generally might not be the best option for the sake of your
privacy.
It would be smarter to use a cloud under your own control without the control
of ONE entity.
I may propose to use https://www.owncloud.org instead of blaming a
Hi Janos,
If your computer was taken over by ransomware that encrypted your files
then you are yelling at the wrong people. The "tor people" had nothing
to do with this.
You are the 2nd person this week to contact the list about this. The
first person had no backup/restore capability - at l
- Original Message
From: "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists"
Apparently from: tor-talk-boun...@lists.torproject.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Exit Traffic classification and discrimination
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:26:23 +0100
> Answers in-line.
Answers in-line.
On 1/31/16 5:00 PM, amuse wrote:
> Hi Fabio:
>
> TLDR: No, I haven't and wouldn't try this.
>
>
> If I understand, you're asking "Why don't TOR operators discriminate on
> traffic by passing packets to popular, acceptable sites and
> discriminating against traffic headed "elsew
Hi Fabio:
TLDR: No, I haven't and wouldn't try this.
If I understand, you're asking "Why don't TOR operators discriminate on
traffic by passing packets to popular, acceptable sites and
discriminating against traffic headed "elsewhere" by re-routing it.
This view ignores a few fundamental facts
Hello,
the internet is said to be driving most of it's traffic to a list of
some dozens websites, usually major internet companies.
I'm wondering if the Tor Exit traffic follow the very same rules.
I'm just assuming that if the traffic destinated to the top-30 website
in the world, make up (for
11 matches
Mail list logo
